Erika L Thompson, Stacey B Griner, Idara N Akpan, Sarah B Maness, Rachel J Meadows, Kimberly G Fulda, Miranda E Cano, Tracey E Barnett
{"title":"北德克萨斯州诊所团队的HPV疫苗接种知识、态度和行为。","authors":"Erika L Thompson, Stacey B Griner, Idara N Akpan, Sarah B Maness, Rachel J Meadows, Kimberly G Fulda, Miranda E Cano, Tracey E Barnett","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02659-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine rates are low in the USA, with additional disparities noted in and within states such as Texas. To increase HPV vaccine uptake, healthcare providers and clinical team members are essential agents in promoting HPV vaccination to their patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of clinic team members, stratified by clinicians (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) and non-clinician staff (i.e., nurses and medical assistants) in North Texas. Survey data were collected as part of a quality improvement project to improve HPV vaccination in a safety-net health system and federally qualified health center. Knowledge items were related to guidelines for HPV vaccination by patient age and the types of cancer the HPV vaccine can prevent. Attitudes were related to the importance of recommending the HPV vaccine and self-efficacy in making vaccine recommendations, and behavioral items included current recommendation behaviors and barriers to recommendations. Data were stratified by role, clinicians and non-clinicians, and were analyzed in SAS. Participants (n = 125) were knowledgeable, but significant differences were noted by the individual's role (p < 0.05). Participants differed in their knowledge of the cancers the HPV vaccine can prevent. Common barriers reported were parental vaccine hesitancy (70% clinicians, 45% non-clinicians) and parents lacking information (49% clinicians, 58% non-clinicians). Given that HPV vaccination requires a clinic team approach to promote uptake, identification of the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers among these clinical team members can guide the development of tailored education strategies to improve vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HPV Vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Clinic Teams in North Texas.\",\"authors\":\"Erika L Thompson, Stacey B Griner, Idara N Akpan, Sarah B Maness, Rachel J Meadows, Kimberly G Fulda, Miranda E Cano, Tracey E Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02659-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine rates are low in the USA, with additional disparities noted in and within states such as Texas. To increase HPV vaccine uptake, healthcare providers and clinical team members are essential agents in promoting HPV vaccination to their patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of clinic team members, stratified by clinicians (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) and non-clinician staff (i.e., nurses and medical assistants) in North Texas. Survey data were collected as part of a quality improvement project to improve HPV vaccination in a safety-net health system and federally qualified health center. Knowledge items were related to guidelines for HPV vaccination by patient age and the types of cancer the HPV vaccine can prevent. Attitudes were related to the importance of recommending the HPV vaccine and self-efficacy in making vaccine recommendations, and behavioral items included current recommendation behaviors and barriers to recommendations. Data were stratified by role, clinicians and non-clinicians, and were analyzed in SAS. Participants (n = 125) were knowledgeable, but significant differences were noted by the individual's role (p < 0.05). Participants differed in their knowledge of the cancers the HPV vaccine can prevent. Common barriers reported were parental vaccine hesitancy (70% clinicians, 45% non-clinicians) and parents lacking information (49% clinicians, 58% non-clinicians). Given that HPV vaccination requires a clinic team approach to promote uptake, identification of the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers among these clinical team members can guide the development of tailored education strategies to improve vaccine uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02659-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02659-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
HPV Vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Clinic Teams in North Texas.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine rates are low in the USA, with additional disparities noted in and within states such as Texas. To increase HPV vaccine uptake, healthcare providers and clinical team members are essential agents in promoting HPV vaccination to their patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of clinic team members, stratified by clinicians (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) and non-clinician staff (i.e., nurses and medical assistants) in North Texas. Survey data were collected as part of a quality improvement project to improve HPV vaccination in a safety-net health system and federally qualified health center. Knowledge items were related to guidelines for HPV vaccination by patient age and the types of cancer the HPV vaccine can prevent. Attitudes were related to the importance of recommending the HPV vaccine and self-efficacy in making vaccine recommendations, and behavioral items included current recommendation behaviors and barriers to recommendations. Data were stratified by role, clinicians and non-clinicians, and were analyzed in SAS. Participants (n = 125) were knowledgeable, but significant differences were noted by the individual's role (p < 0.05). Participants differed in their knowledge of the cancers the HPV vaccine can prevent. Common barriers reported were parental vaccine hesitancy (70% clinicians, 45% non-clinicians) and parents lacking information (49% clinicians, 58% non-clinicians). Given that HPV vaccination requires a clinic team approach to promote uptake, identification of the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers among these clinical team members can guide the development of tailored education strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.