小组领导和成员此时此地焦点和治疗因素:一项语言调查和字数分析。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rayna D Markin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Cheri Marmarosh, Sabrina Ge, David Kealy, Paul L Hewitt
{"title":"小组领导和成员此时此地焦点和治疗因素:一项语言调查和字数分析。","authors":"Rayna D Markin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Cheri Marmarosh, Sabrina Ge, David Kealy, Paul L Hewitt","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2506653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Yalom (1985) believed that working in the here-and-now of the group is essential to facilitating the \"therapeutic factors\" necessary for a successful outcome. Yet, we currently lack research examining whether a here-and-now in-session focus predicts the therapeutic factors, as theorized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used <i>Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count</i> (LIWC) analysis to assess group member and leader in-session here-and-now focus by analyzing words spoken in a session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest that when group leaders use more here-and-now words in a speaking turn, group members use more here-and-now words in the subsequent speaking turn. However, contrary to expectation, group leaders and group members \"matching\" on here-and-now language in a session did not predict more therapeutic factors in between sessions, but rather less social learning. Instead, how consistent or variable group members or leaders were in their here-and-now focus generally predicted more therapeutic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that LIWC may be a promising vehicle to assess here-and-now language in group therapy sessions and that a here-and-now in-session focus has a complex relationship with the therapeutic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Leader and Member Here-and-now Focus and Therapeutic Factors: A Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rayna D Markin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Cheri Marmarosh, Sabrina Ge, David Kealy, Paul L Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2506653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Yalom (1985) believed that working in the here-and-now of the group is essential to facilitating the \\\"therapeutic factors\\\" necessary for a successful outcome. Yet, we currently lack research examining whether a here-and-now in-session focus predicts the therapeutic factors, as theorized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used <i>Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count</i> (LIWC) analysis to assess group member and leader in-session here-and-now focus by analyzing words spoken in a session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest that when group leaders use more here-and-now words in a speaking turn, group members use more here-and-now words in the subsequent speaking turn. However, contrary to expectation, group leaders and group members \\\"matching\\\" on here-and-now language in a session did not predict more therapeutic factors in between sessions, but rather less social learning. Instead, how consistent or variable group members or leaders were in their here-and-now focus generally predicted more therapeutic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that LIWC may be a promising vehicle to assess here-and-now language in group therapy sessions and that a here-and-now in-session focus has a complex relationship with the therapeutic factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2506653\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2506653","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Yalom(1985)认为,在团队的此时此地工作对于促进成功结果所必需的“治疗因素”至关重要。然而,我们目前缺乏研究来检验此时此地的治疗焦点是否能像理论上那样预测治疗因素。方法:本研究采用语言探究和单词计数(LIWC)分析方法,通过分析小组成员和领导在会议中所说的单词,来评估小组成员和领导在会议中的“此时此地”焦点。结果:研究结果表明,当小组领导在一个演讲回合中使用更多的“此时此刻”词语时,小组成员在随后的演讲回合中使用更多的“此时此刻”词语。然而,与预期相反,小组领导和小组成员在一次会议中“匹配”的此时此地语言并没有预示着在两次会议之间会有更多的治疗因素,而是更少的社会学习。相反,小组成员或领导者在此时此地的关注点是一致的还是可变的,通常预示着更多的治疗因素。结论:这些结果表明,LIWC可能是评估团体治疗过程中此时此地语言的一个有希望的工具,并且此时此地在治疗过程中的焦点与治疗因素有复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group Leader and Member Here-and-now Focus and Therapeutic Factors: A Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Analysis.

Objective: Yalom (1985) believed that working in the here-and-now of the group is essential to facilitating the "therapeutic factors" necessary for a successful outcome. Yet, we currently lack research examining whether a here-and-now in-session focus predicts the therapeutic factors, as theorized.

Methods: This study used Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analysis to assess group member and leader in-session here-and-now focus by analyzing words spoken in a session.

Results: The results suggest that when group leaders use more here-and-now words in a speaking turn, group members use more here-and-now words in the subsequent speaking turn. However, contrary to expectation, group leaders and group members "matching" on here-and-now language in a session did not predict more therapeutic factors in between sessions, but rather less social learning. Instead, how consistent or variable group members or leaders were in their here-and-now focus generally predicted more therapeutic factors.

Conclusion: These results suggest that LIWC may be a promising vehicle to assess here-and-now language in group therapy sessions and that a here-and-now in-session focus has a complex relationship with the therapeutic factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信