对话空间:建筑师和教育家。

IF 1.5 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Noeline Wright, Trent Thompson, Tim Horne
{"title":"对话空间:建筑师和教育家。","authors":"Noeline Wright, Trent Thompson, Tim Horne","doi":"10.1007/s40841-021-00193-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article synthesises longitudinal deliberations between two architects and an educator, seeking common ground about learning spaces in schools. As the impetus for new and refurbished school buildings continues in New Zealand, it is timely to unpack instinctual disciplinary practices to better understand space and place in schools. We undertook a process of 'bumping' ideas against one another, establishing intersections around the nature of physical spaces created, inhabited, appropriated and used for educational purposes. The process of documenting our deliberations was dialogic and autoethnographic. Through interrogating ideas about space and place in literature and images, we explored how classrooms function for teaching and learning, and opportunities for both intimate and social learning and teaching. We sought to clarify how architects translate ideas about flexible learning, collaboration and whole class teaching into the design of schools and classrooms. We shared knowledge about pedagogy and architecture, and from these iterative dialogic practices, we offer ideas about educational spaces and places from those positions. As disciplinary professionals, we had internalised so much knowledge and expertise within our own fields,we realised that articulating it to others can be a struggle. We have shared the crafting of this article to partially compensate for misplacing the words to express how and why we do what we do in our own practices. We believe that it matters not only that learning spaces are designed well, but also that architects and educators can talk with rather than past each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":"56 Suppl 1","pages":"45-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking Spaces: Architects and Educators.\",\"authors\":\"Noeline Wright, Trent Thompson, Tim Horne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40841-021-00193-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article synthesises longitudinal deliberations between two architects and an educator, seeking common ground about learning spaces in schools. As the impetus for new and refurbished school buildings continues in New Zealand, it is timely to unpack instinctual disciplinary practices to better understand space and place in schools. We undertook a process of 'bumping' ideas against one another, establishing intersections around the nature of physical spaces created, inhabited, appropriated and used for educational purposes. The process of documenting our deliberations was dialogic and autoethnographic. Through interrogating ideas about space and place in literature and images, we explored how classrooms function for teaching and learning, and opportunities for both intimate and social learning and teaching. We sought to clarify how architects translate ideas about flexible learning, collaboration and whole class teaching into the design of schools and classrooms. We shared knowledge about pedagogy and architecture, and from these iterative dialogic practices, we offer ideas about educational spaces and places from those positions. As disciplinary professionals, we had internalised so much knowledge and expertise within our own fields,we realised that articulating it to others can be a struggle. We have shared the crafting of this article to partially compensate for misplacing the words to express how and why we do what we do in our own practices. We believe that it matters not only that learning spaces are designed well, but also that architects and educators can talk with rather than past each other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"56 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"45-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00193-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00193-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综合了两位建筑师和一位教育家之间的纵向讨论,寻求关于学校学习空间的共同点。随着新西兰新建和翻新学校建筑的动力持续,现在是时候解开本能的学科实践,以更好地理解学校的空间和地点。我们进行了一个相互碰撞的过程,围绕物理空间的本质建立了交叉点,这些空间被创造、居住、占用和用于教育目的。记录我们讨论的过程是对话式的,也是自我民族学的。通过对文学和图像中关于空间和地点的质疑,我们探索了课堂如何发挥教学和学习的作用,以及亲密和社会学习和教学的机会。我们试图阐明建筑师如何将灵活学习、协作和全班教学的理念转化为学校和教室的设计。我们分享了关于教育学和建筑的知识,通过这些反复的对话实践,我们提供了关于教育空间和地方的想法。作为学科专业人士,我们在自己的领域内化了如此多的知识和专业知识,我们意识到将其表达给他人可能是一场斗争。我们分享了这篇文章的构思,部分地弥补了在表达我们如何以及为什么在我们自己的实践中做我们所做的事情时用词不当的问题。我们认为,重要的不仅是学习空间的设计,而且建筑师和教育工作者可以相互交流,而不是相互回避。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talking Spaces: Architects and Educators.

This article synthesises longitudinal deliberations between two architects and an educator, seeking common ground about learning spaces in schools. As the impetus for new and refurbished school buildings continues in New Zealand, it is timely to unpack instinctual disciplinary practices to better understand space and place in schools. We undertook a process of 'bumping' ideas against one another, establishing intersections around the nature of physical spaces created, inhabited, appropriated and used for educational purposes. The process of documenting our deliberations was dialogic and autoethnographic. Through interrogating ideas about space and place in literature and images, we explored how classrooms function for teaching and learning, and opportunities for both intimate and social learning and teaching. We sought to clarify how architects translate ideas about flexible learning, collaboration and whole class teaching into the design of schools and classrooms. We shared knowledge about pedagogy and architecture, and from these iterative dialogic practices, we offer ideas about educational spaces and places from those positions. As disciplinary professionals, we had internalised so much knowledge and expertise within our own fields,we realised that articulating it to others can be a struggle. We have shared the crafting of this article to partially compensate for misplacing the words to express how and why we do what we do in our own practices. We believe that it matters not only that learning spaces are designed well, but also that architects and educators can talk with rather than past each other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: New Zealand Journal of Education Studies (NZJES) is the journal of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Since 1966, NZJES has published research of relevance to both the Aotearoa New Zealand and international education communities. NZJES publishes original research and scholarly writing that is insightful and thought provoking. NZJES seeks submissions of empirical (qualitative and quantitative) and non-empirical articles, including those that are methodologically or theoretically innovative, as well as scholarly essays and book reviews. The journal is multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary in approach, and committed to the principles and practice of biculturalism. In accordance with that commitment, NZJES welcomes submissions in either Maori or English, or the inclusion of the paper abstract in both English and Maori. NZJES also welcomes international submissions that shed light on matters of interest to its readership and that include reference to Aotearoa New Zealand authors and/or contexts. The journal also welcomes proposals for Special Themed Sections, which are groups of related papers curated by guest editors.NZJES is indexed in Scopus and ERIC. All articles have undergone rigorous double blind peer review by at least two expert reviewers, who are asked to adhere to the ‘Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers’ published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信