Shuaiyong Zhang, Yumeng Lei, Jingfu Chen, Youcheng Wang, Huanting Liu, Nan Guo, Yunfei Wang, Xufen Cao, Liqiu Yan
{"title":"残留句法评分II对复杂冠心病合并慢性肾功能不全患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的预测价值","authors":"Shuaiyong Zhang, Yumeng Lei, Jingfu Chen, Youcheng Wang, Huanting Liu, Nan Guo, Yunfei Wang, Xufen Cao, Liqiu Yan","doi":"10.31083/RCM26962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of this research was to determine the predictive value of the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (rSS-II) for long-term outcomes in individuals with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1161 consecutive patients with complex CAD and CRI after PCI were retrospectively recruited from Cangzhou Central Hospital affiliated with Hebei Medical University between January 2014 and September 2017. The patients were stratified into three categories based on rSS-II tertiles: low rSS-II (n = 388), medium rSS-II (n = 389), and high rSS-II (n = 384). The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM), while the secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which included ACM, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the rSS-II for predicting long-term outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 37 months (19 to 61 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate rates of ACM (2.4% vs. 5.9% vs. 13.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and CM (1.9% vs. 2.8% vs. 9.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) revealed significant differences among the three categories. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the rSS-II could independently predict ACM (hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.12; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and CM (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.12; <i>p</i> = 0.009). The rSS-II performed satisfactorily in both discrimination (area under the curve for ACM and CM was 0.710 and 0.728, respectively) and calibration (Greenwood-Nam-D' Agostino goodness-of-fit test for long-term outcomes; <i>p</i> > 0.05 for all). Additionally, decision curve analysis showed that the rSS-II had a high net benefit for long-term outcomes over threshold probabilities, indicating its superiority in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rSS-II is beneficial for predicting and stratifying the risk of long-term outcomes in individuals with complex CAD and CRI who have undergone PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"26962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Value of Residual SYNTAX Score II for Patients With Complex Coronary Disease and Chronic Renal Insufficiency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Shuaiyong Zhang, Yumeng Lei, Jingfu Chen, Youcheng Wang, Huanting Liu, Nan Guo, Yunfei Wang, Xufen Cao, Liqiu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM26962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary objective of this research was to determine the predictive value of the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (rSS-II) for long-term outcomes in individuals with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1161 consecutive patients with complex CAD and CRI after PCI were retrospectively recruited from Cangzhou Central Hospital affiliated with Hebei Medical University between January 2014 and September 2017. The patients were stratified into three categories based on rSS-II tertiles: low rSS-II (n = 388), medium rSS-II (n = 389), and high rSS-II (n = 384). The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM), while the secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which included ACM, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the rSS-II for predicting long-term outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 37 months (19 to 61 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate rates of ACM (2.4% vs. 5.9% vs. 13.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and CM (1.9% vs. 2.8% vs. 9.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) revealed significant differences among the three categories. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the rSS-II could independently predict ACM (hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.12; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and CM (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.12; <i>p</i> = 0.009). The rSS-II performed satisfactorily in both discrimination (area under the curve for ACM and CM was 0.710 and 0.728, respectively) and calibration (Greenwood-Nam-D' Agostino goodness-of-fit test for long-term outcomes; <i>p</i> > 0.05 for all). Additionally, decision curve analysis showed that the rSS-II had a high net benefit for long-term outcomes over threshold probabilities, indicating its superiority in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rSS-II is beneficial for predicting and stratifying the risk of long-term outcomes in individuals with complex CAD and CRI who have undergone PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"26962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26962\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究的主要目的是确定剩余SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术之间的协同作用)评分II (rSS-II)对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的复杂冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和慢性肾功能不全(CRI)患者的长期预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性收集2014年1月至2017年9月河北医科大学附属沧州中心医院PCI术后合并复杂CAD和CRI患者1161例。根据rs - ii分类将患者分为3类:低rs - ii (n = 388)、中rs - ii (n = 389)和高rs - ii (n = 384)。主要终点是全因死亡率(ACM)和心脏死亡率(CM),次要终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs),包括ACM、心肌梗死、中风或计划外血运重建术。研究了rSS-II在预测长期预后方面的区分、校准和临床应用。结果:中位随访时间为37个月(19 ~ 61个月)。ACM的Kaplan-Meier估计率(2.4% vs. 5.9% vs. 13.9%;p < 0.001)和CM (1.9% vs. 2.8% vs. 9.2%;P < 0.001),三者之间存在显著差异。多因素Cox回归分析表明,rSS-II能够独立预测ACM(风险比:1.08,95%可信区间:1.04-1.12;p < 0.001)和CM(风险比:1.07,95%可信区间:1.02-1.12;P = 0.009)。rSS-II在鉴别(ACM和CM的曲线下面积分别为0.710和0.728)和校准(Greenwood-Nam-D' Agostino长期结果拟合优度检验;P < 0.05)。此外,决策曲线分析表明,rSS-II对于长期结果具有高于阈值概率的高净效益,表明其在日常实践中的优势。结论:rSS-II有助于预测和分层接受PCI治疗的复杂CAD和CRI患者的长期预后风险。
Predictive Value of Residual SYNTAX Score II for Patients With Complex Coronary Disease and Chronic Renal Insufficiency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Background: The primary objective of this research was to determine the predictive value of the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (rSS-II) for long-term outcomes in individuals with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: A total of 1161 consecutive patients with complex CAD and CRI after PCI were retrospectively recruited from Cangzhou Central Hospital affiliated with Hebei Medical University between January 2014 and September 2017. The patients were stratified into three categories based on rSS-II tertiles: low rSS-II (n = 388), medium rSS-II (n = 389), and high rSS-II (n = 384). The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM), while the secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which included ACM, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the rSS-II for predicting long-term outcomes were examined.
Results: The median follow-up period was 37 months (19 to 61 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate rates of ACM (2.4% vs. 5.9% vs. 13.9%; p < 0.001) and CM (1.9% vs. 2.8% vs. 9.2%; p < 0.001) revealed significant differences among the three categories. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the rSS-II could independently predict ACM (hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001) and CM (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.12; p = 0.009). The rSS-II performed satisfactorily in both discrimination (area under the curve for ACM and CM was 0.710 and 0.728, respectively) and calibration (Greenwood-Nam-D' Agostino goodness-of-fit test for long-term outcomes; p > 0.05 for all). Additionally, decision curve analysis showed that the rSS-II had a high net benefit for long-term outcomes over threshold probabilities, indicating its superiority in daily practice.
Conclusions: The rSS-II is beneficial for predicting and stratifying the risk of long-term outcomes in individuals with complex CAD and CRI who have undergone PCI.
期刊介绍:
RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.