TAVI术后单纯主动脉返流患者永久起搏器植入术的效果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM26543
Changlin Ju, Yu Zhou, Tao Ge, Shengxin Tang, Zhigang Guo, Shiping Cao
{"title":"TAVI术后单纯主动脉返流患者永久起搏器植入术的效果。","authors":"Changlin Ju, Yu Zhou, Tao Ge, Shengxin Tang, Zhigang Guo, Shiping Cao","doi":"10.31083/RCM26543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly utilized for patients with pure aortic regurgitation (PAR). A significant clinical challenge in this patient population is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which occurs frequently post-TAVI and can impact cardiac conduction and rhythm management. This study aimed to explore the effects of PPI on short-term mortality, rates of adverse events, and cardiac function in PAR patients following TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study, conducted in a single center, included 69 PAR patients who underwent TAVI from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received a permanent pacemaker (PM) and those who did not (NPM). The outcomes measured included complications such as pacemaker pocket hematoma and infection, changes in postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at 6 months, as well as rates of rehospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics or complications between the PM and NPM groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The types of PPI and associated complications were also comparable. There was no significant disparity in the incidence of all-cause mortality (PM: 12%, NPM: 11.36%, <i>p</i> = 0.755), major bleeding (PM: 4%, NPM: 4.55%, <i>p</i> = 0.612), or cerebral embolism (PM: 12%, NPM: 4.55%, <i>p</i> = 0.506) between the two groups at 6 months post-TAVI. Additionally, readmission rates were similar at 1, 3, and 6 months following the procedure. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age (<i>p</i> = 0.020), history of cerebral infarction (<i>p</i> = 0.015), and hypertension (<i>p</i> = 0.019) were significant predictors of mortality. The survival curve indicated that fatalities in the NPM group predominantly occurred during the perioperative period. At the 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.971). Regarding cardiac function, irrespective of PPI, a decreasing trend in LVEDD (PM: -4.19 mm, NPM: -6.16 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and an increasing trend in LVEF (PM: +2.19%, NPM: +2.74%, <i>p</i> = 0.053) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study was the first to investigate the effects of PPI on the short-term mortality, adverse events, and cardiac function of PAR after TAVI. The results indicated that for PAR, advanced age and previous cerebral embolism increase the mortality after TAVI; however, PPI was not associated with mortality and adverse events after 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"26543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.\",\"authors\":\"Changlin Ju, Yu Zhou, Tao Ge, Shengxin Tang, Zhigang Guo, Shiping Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM26543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly utilized for patients with pure aortic regurgitation (PAR). A significant clinical challenge in this patient population is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which occurs frequently post-TAVI and can impact cardiac conduction and rhythm management. This study aimed to explore the effects of PPI on short-term mortality, rates of adverse events, and cardiac function in PAR patients following TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study, conducted in a single center, included 69 PAR patients who underwent TAVI from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received a permanent pacemaker (PM) and those who did not (NPM). The outcomes measured included complications such as pacemaker pocket hematoma and infection, changes in postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at 6 months, as well as rates of rehospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics or complications between the PM and NPM groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The types of PPI and associated complications were also comparable. There was no significant disparity in the incidence of all-cause mortality (PM: 12%, NPM: 11.36%, <i>p</i> = 0.755), major bleeding (PM: 4%, NPM: 4.55%, <i>p</i> = 0.612), or cerebral embolism (PM: 12%, NPM: 4.55%, <i>p</i> = 0.506) between the two groups at 6 months post-TAVI. Additionally, readmission rates were similar at 1, 3, and 6 months following the procedure. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age (<i>p</i> = 0.020), history of cerebral infarction (<i>p</i> = 0.015), and hypertension (<i>p</i> = 0.019) were significant predictors of mortality. The survival curve indicated that fatalities in the NPM group predominantly occurred during the perioperative period. At the 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.971). Regarding cardiac function, irrespective of PPI, a decreasing trend in LVEDD (PM: -4.19 mm, NPM: -6.16 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.000) and an increasing trend in LVEF (PM: +2.19%, NPM: +2.74%, <i>p</i> = 0.053) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study was the first to investigate the effects of PPI on the short-term mortality, adverse events, and cardiac function of PAR after TAVI. The results indicated that for PAR, advanced age and previous cerebral embolism increase the mortality after TAVI; however, PPI was not associated with mortality and adverse events after 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"26543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)越来越多地用于单纯主动脉瓣反流(PAR)患者。在这类患者中,一个重要的临床挑战是需要永久性起搏器植入(PPI),这在tavi后经常发生,并可能影响心脏传导和节律管理。本研究旨在探讨PPI对TAVI后PAR患者短期死亡率、不良事件发生率和心功能的影响。方法:本回顾性研究在单中心进行,纳入了2021年1月至2023年12月期间接受TAVI治疗的69例PAR患者。患者被分为两组:接受永久性起搏器(PM)的患者和未接受永久性起搏器(NPM)的患者。测量的结果包括并发症,如起搏器袋血肿和感染,术后6个月左室射血分数(LVEF)和左室舒张末期直径(LVEDD)的变化,以及再住院率和死亡率。结果:PM组与NPM组在基线特征及并发症方面无显著差异(p < 0.05)。PPI的类型和相关并发症也具有可比性。tavi后6个月,两组患者的全因死亡率(PM: 12%, NPM: 11.36%, p = 0.755)、大出血(PM: 4%, NPM: 4.55%, p = 0.612)和脑栓塞(PM: 12%, NPM: 4.55%, p = 0.506)发生率无显著差异。此外,手术后1、3和6个月的再入院率相似。多项logistic回归分析显示,年龄(p = 0.020)、脑梗死史(p = 0.015)和高血压(p = 0.019)是死亡率的显著预测因素。生存曲线显示NPM组的死亡主要发生在围手术期。随访6个月时,两组患者生存率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.971)。在心功能方面,与PPI无关,LVEDD呈下降趋势(PM: -4.19 mm, NPM: -6.16 mm, p = 0.000), LVEF呈上升趋势(PM: +2.19%, NPM: +2.74%, p = 0.053)。结论:本研究首次探讨了PPI对TAVI术后PAR短期死亡率、不良事件和心功能的影响。结果表明,PAR、高龄及既往脑栓塞增加TAVI术后死亡率;然而,PPI与6个月后的死亡率和不良事件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Pure Aortic Regurgitation after TAVI.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly utilized for patients with pure aortic regurgitation (PAR). A significant clinical challenge in this patient population is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), which occurs frequently post-TAVI and can impact cardiac conduction and rhythm management. This study aimed to explore the effects of PPI on short-term mortality, rates of adverse events, and cardiac function in PAR patients following TAVI.

Methods: This retrospective study, conducted in a single center, included 69 PAR patients who underwent TAVI from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who received a permanent pacemaker (PM) and those who did not (NPM). The outcomes measured included complications such as pacemaker pocket hematoma and infection, changes in postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) at 6 months, as well as rates of rehospitalization and mortality.

Results: No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics or complications between the PM and NPM groups (p > 0.05). The types of PPI and associated complications were also comparable. There was no significant disparity in the incidence of all-cause mortality (PM: 12%, NPM: 11.36%, p = 0.755), major bleeding (PM: 4%, NPM: 4.55%, p = 0.612), or cerebral embolism (PM: 12%, NPM: 4.55%, p = 0.506) between the two groups at 6 months post-TAVI. Additionally, readmission rates were similar at 1, 3, and 6 months following the procedure. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that age (p = 0.020), history of cerebral infarction (p = 0.015), and hypertension (p = 0.019) were significant predictors of mortality. The survival curve indicated that fatalities in the NPM group predominantly occurred during the perioperative period. At the 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (p = 0.971). Regarding cardiac function, irrespective of PPI, a decreasing trend in LVEDD (PM: -4.19 mm, NPM: -6.16 mm, p = 0.000) and an increasing trend in LVEF (PM: +2.19%, NPM: +2.74%, p = 0.053) were observed.

Conclusions: This study was the first to investigate the effects of PPI on the short-term mortality, adverse events, and cardiac function of PAR after TAVI. The results indicated that for PAR, advanced age and previous cerebral embolism increase the mortality after TAVI; however, PPI was not associated with mortality and adverse events after 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信