利用正电子发射断层扫描模拟研究捕获方案和量化方法的影响:一项18F-Fallypride研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mohlapoli S Mohlapholi, Alex Doruyter, Michael Mix, Chris Trauernicht, Annare Ellmann, James Warwick, Patrick Dupont
{"title":"利用正电子发射断层扫描模拟研究捕获方案和量化方法的影响:一项18F-Fallypride研究。","authors":"Mohlapoli S Mohlapholi, Alex Doruyter, Michael Mix, Chris Trauernicht, Annare Ellmann, James Warwick, Patrick Dupont","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This computational study evaluates the accuracy of kinetic models and acquisition schemes in dynamic PET imaging using simulations of 18F-fallypride PET in the human brain on the real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a 2-tissue 4-k model to generate ideal tissue curves for three regions (putamen, thalamus, and temporal cortex) and a reference region (cerebellum), incorporating a simulated metabolite-corrected input function. Realistic measurements were simulated over a 240-min PET scan by defining acquisition protocols (frame timings and durations), modeling tracer decay, and adding noise. Distribution volume ratios (DVRs) were calculated using the Logan reference analysis and the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM), the relative error in DVR was also assessed across various acquisition protocols. Rate constants from the 2-tissue model were varied, and Bland-Altman analysis was quantified to determine bias relative to ground-truth DVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that, under low noise conditions, the Logan reference method performed optimally with a protocol involving a 60-min dynamic scan, a 60-min break, a 30-min scan, another 60-min break, and a final 30-min scan. In noisier conditions, the SRTM yielded the best results with a 150-min effective scan time incorporating three breaks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the impact of noise and acquisition strategy on model performance, informing optimal PET imaging protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of simulations to study the effect of acquisition schemes and quantification methods using positron emission tomography: an 18F-Fallypride study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohlapoli S Mohlapholi, Alex Doruyter, Michael Mix, Chris Trauernicht, Annare Ellmann, James Warwick, Patrick Dupont\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This computational study evaluates the accuracy of kinetic models and acquisition schemes in dynamic PET imaging using simulations of 18F-fallypride PET in the human brain on the real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a 2-tissue 4-k model to generate ideal tissue curves for three regions (putamen, thalamus, and temporal cortex) and a reference region (cerebellum), incorporating a simulated metabolite-corrected input function. Realistic measurements were simulated over a 240-min PET scan by defining acquisition protocols (frame timings and durations), modeling tracer decay, and adding noise. Distribution volume ratios (DVRs) were calculated using the Logan reference analysis and the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM), the relative error in DVR was also assessed across various acquisition protocols. Rate constants from the 2-tissue model were varied, and Bland-Altman analysis was quantified to determine bias relative to ground-truth DVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that, under low noise conditions, the Logan reference method performed optimally with a protocol involving a 60-min dynamic scan, a 60-min break, a 30-min scan, another 60-min break, and a final 30-min scan. In noisier conditions, the SRTM yielded the best results with a 150-min effective scan time incorporating three breaks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the impact of noise and acquisition strategy on model performance, informing optimal PET imaging protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001995\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本计算研究通过在真实世界数据上模拟人脑中的18F-fallypride PET,评估动态PET成像中动力学模型和获取方案的准确性。方法:我们采用一个2-组织4-k模型来生成三个区域(壳核、丘脑和颞叶皮层)和一个参考区域(小脑)的理想组织曲线,并结合模拟的代谢物校正输入函数。通过定义采集协议(帧时间和持续时间)、建模示踪剂衰减和添加噪声,模拟了240分钟PET扫描的实际测量结果。利用Logan参考分析和简化参考组织模型(SRTM)计算了分布体积比(DVR),并评估了不同采集方案下DVR的相对误差。两组织模型的速率常数是不同的,Bland-Altman分析被量化,以确定相对于地面真值DVR的偏差。结果:结果表明,在低噪声条件下,Logan参考方法在包括60分钟动态扫描、60分钟休息、30分钟扫描、60分钟休息和最后30分钟扫描的方案中表现最佳。在嘈杂的条件下,SRTM在150分钟的有效扫描时间内获得了最佳效果,其中包括三次休息。结论:这些发现突出了噪声和采集策略对模型性能的影响,为最佳PET成像方案提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of simulations to study the effect of acquisition schemes and quantification methods using positron emission tomography: an 18F-Fallypride study.

Introduction: This computational study evaluates the accuracy of kinetic models and acquisition schemes in dynamic PET imaging using simulations of 18F-fallypride PET in the human brain on the real-world data.

Methods: We employed a 2-tissue 4-k model to generate ideal tissue curves for three regions (putamen, thalamus, and temporal cortex) and a reference region (cerebellum), incorporating a simulated metabolite-corrected input function. Realistic measurements were simulated over a 240-min PET scan by defining acquisition protocols (frame timings and durations), modeling tracer decay, and adding noise. Distribution volume ratios (DVRs) were calculated using the Logan reference analysis and the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM), the relative error in DVR was also assessed across various acquisition protocols. Rate constants from the 2-tissue model were varied, and Bland-Altman analysis was quantified to determine bias relative to ground-truth DVR.

Results: Results indicate that, under low noise conditions, the Logan reference method performed optimally with a protocol involving a 60-min dynamic scan, a 60-min break, a 30-min scan, another 60-min break, and a final 30-min scan. In noisier conditions, the SRTM yielded the best results with a 150-min effective scan time incorporating three breaks.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact of noise and acquisition strategy on model performance, informing optimal PET imaging protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信