肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者每日一次给药与已批准的48周内开/关给药依达拉奉口服混悬液的疗效和安全性(研究MT-1186-A02)

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1002/mus.28448
Jeffrey Rothstein, Angela Genge, Shari De Silva, Lorne Zinman, Marvin Chum, Adriano Chio, Gen Sobue, Masashi Aoki, Hiide Yoshino, Manabu Doyu, Daniel Selness, Vesna Todorovic, Nissim Sasson, Manabu Hirai, Fumihiro Takahashi, Alejandro Salah, Art Wamil, Stephen Apple
{"title":"肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者每日一次给药与已批准的48周内开/关给药依达拉奉口服混悬液的疗效和安全性(研究MT-1186-A02)","authors":"Jeffrey Rothstein, Angela Genge, Shari De Silva, Lorne Zinman, Marvin Chum, Adriano Chio, Gen Sobue, Masashi Aoki, Hiide Yoshino, Manabu Doyu, Daniel Selness, Vesna Todorovic, Nissim Sasson, Manabu Hirai, Fumihiro Takahashi, Alejandro Salah, Art Wamil, Stephen Apple","doi":"10.1002/mus.28448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>An On/Off dosing regimen of intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension is approved in the US for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Placebo-controlled clinical trials showed IV edaravone slows the rate of physical functional decline. This study evaluated whether investigational daily dosing displayed superior efficacy vs. approved on/off dosing of edaravone oral suspension, and assessed safety and tolerability, over 48 weeks in patients with ALS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study MT-1186-A02 (NCT04569084) was a multicenter, phase 3b, double-blind, parallel group, superiority study that randomized patients to edaravone oral suspension (105-mg dose) administered Once Daily or the same edaravone oral suspension dose administered according to the approved On/Off regimen including placebo to mimic daily drug dosing. Patients had definite or probable ALS, baseline forced vital capacity ≥ 70%, and baseline disease duration ≤ 2 years. The primary endpoint was a combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) at week 48, which included change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and time to death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAFS at week 48 indicated Once Daily dosing did not show a statistically significant difference vs. approved on/off dosing (p = 0.777). Both dosing regimens provided comparable change from baseline ALSFRS-R total score to week 48 (least squares mean difference: 0.27 [95% CI -1.43 to 1.97]). Edaravone oral suspension was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in either group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Daily edaravone oral suspension did not show superiority and had equivalent safety and tolerability vs. the approved On/Off regimen, reinforcing the appropriateness of the approved dosing regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"433-442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Dosing vs. Approved On/Off Dosing of Edaravone Oral Suspension Up to 48 Weeks in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Study MT-1186-A02).\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Rothstein, Angela Genge, Shari De Silva, Lorne Zinman, Marvin Chum, Adriano Chio, Gen Sobue, Masashi Aoki, Hiide Yoshino, Manabu Doyu, Daniel Selness, Vesna Todorovic, Nissim Sasson, Manabu Hirai, Fumihiro Takahashi, Alejandro Salah, Art Wamil, Stephen Apple\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>An On/Off dosing regimen of intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension is approved in the US for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Placebo-controlled clinical trials showed IV edaravone slows the rate of physical functional decline. This study evaluated whether investigational daily dosing displayed superior efficacy vs. approved on/off dosing of edaravone oral suspension, and assessed safety and tolerability, over 48 weeks in patients with ALS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study MT-1186-A02 (NCT04569084) was a multicenter, phase 3b, double-blind, parallel group, superiority study that randomized patients to edaravone oral suspension (105-mg dose) administered Once Daily or the same edaravone oral suspension dose administered according to the approved On/Off regimen including placebo to mimic daily drug dosing. Patients had definite or probable ALS, baseline forced vital capacity ≥ 70%, and baseline disease duration ≤ 2 years. The primary endpoint was a combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) at week 48, which included change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and time to death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAFS at week 48 indicated Once Daily dosing did not show a statistically significant difference vs. approved on/off dosing (p = 0.777). Both dosing regimens provided comparable change from baseline ALSFRS-R total score to week 48 (least squares mean difference: 0.27 [95% CI -1.43 to 1.97]). Edaravone oral suspension was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in either group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Daily edaravone oral suspension did not show superiority and had equivalent safety and tolerability vs. the approved On/Off regimen, reinforcing the appropriateness of the approved dosing regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12338024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28448\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:一种静脉(IV)依达拉奉和依达拉奉口服混悬液的开/关给药方案在美国被批准用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)。安慰剂对照临床试验显示,静脉注射依达拉奉可以减缓身体机能衰退的速度。该研究评估了每日给药是否比批准的依达拉奉口服混悬液更有效,并评估了48周内ALS患者的安全性和耐受性。研究MT-1186-A02 (NCT04569084)是一项多中心,3b期,双盲,平行组,优势研究,随机分配患者依达拉奉口服混悬液(105 mg剂量)每日一次,或根据批准的开/关方案给予相同剂量的依达拉奉口服混悬液,包括安慰剂以模拟每日给药。患者明确或可能患有ALS,基线用力肺活量≥70%,基线病程≤2年。主要终点是48周时功能和生存(CAFS)的综合评估,包括ALS功能评定量表修订(ALSFRS-R)的变化和死亡时间。结果:第48周的CAFS表明,每日给药与批准的开/关给药相比,没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.777)。两种给药方案从基线ALSFRS-R总评分到第48周的变化可比较(最小二乘平均差:0.27 [95% CI -1.43至1.97])。依达拉奉口服混悬液耐受性良好,两组均未发现新的安全性问题。讨论:每日依达拉奉口服混悬液与批准的开/关方案相比没有表现出优势,具有相同的安全性和耐受性,加强了批准给药方案的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Dosing vs. Approved On/Off Dosing of Edaravone Oral Suspension Up to 48 Weeks in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Study MT-1186-A02).

Introduction/aims: An On/Off dosing regimen of intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension is approved in the US for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Placebo-controlled clinical trials showed IV edaravone slows the rate of physical functional decline. This study evaluated whether investigational daily dosing displayed superior efficacy vs. approved on/off dosing of edaravone oral suspension, and assessed safety and tolerability, over 48 weeks in patients with ALS.

Methods: Study MT-1186-A02 (NCT04569084) was a multicenter, phase 3b, double-blind, parallel group, superiority study that randomized patients to edaravone oral suspension (105-mg dose) administered Once Daily or the same edaravone oral suspension dose administered according to the approved On/Off regimen including placebo to mimic daily drug dosing. Patients had definite or probable ALS, baseline forced vital capacity ≥ 70%, and baseline disease duration ≤ 2 years. The primary endpoint was a combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) at week 48, which included change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and time to death.

Results: CAFS at week 48 indicated Once Daily dosing did not show a statistically significant difference vs. approved on/off dosing (p = 0.777). Both dosing regimens provided comparable change from baseline ALSFRS-R total score to week 48 (least squares mean difference: 0.27 [95% CI -1.43 to 1.97]). Edaravone oral suspension was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in either group.

Discussion: Daily edaravone oral suspension did not show superiority and had equivalent safety and tolerability vs. the approved On/Off regimen, reinforcing the appropriateness of the approved dosing regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信