ESKD的金融毒性。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000857
Lindsey M Maclay, Kyle Woodward, Natalie Strohmayer, Miko E Yu, Sumit Mohan, Anne M Huml, Syed Ali Husain
{"title":"ESKD的金融毒性。","authors":"Lindsey M Maclay, Kyle Woodward, Natalie Strohmayer, Miko E Yu, Sumit Mohan, Anne M Huml, Syed Ali Husain","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with kidney failure require treatments that are demanding and time-intensive, potentially interfering with employability and leading to indirect costs. We sought to characterize the prevalence of, and risk factors for financial toxicity among patients with kidney failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of 112 participants with kidney failure at a large, urban, academic medical center. Financial toxicity was assessed via a survey which included the validated CoST tool as well as additional items to evaluate self-reported changes to material conditions and financial coping behaviors. Participants were grouped according to kidney replacement therapy modality (dialysis, transplant after dialysis, or preemptive transplant) Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population and to compare those with above-median vs below-medial CoST scores, and by modality of kidney replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median CoST score was 17 with 71% of participants experiencing at least mild financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity were less likely to have White race, and more likely to be receiving dialysis. Over half of participants reported reduction in employment (61%) or income (57%) following kidney failure onset with the greatest likelihood of these among participants with any dialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with kidney failure experience significant financial toxicity as measured by the CoST score and report significant negative changes in employment and income. Although this toxicity persists through many stages of treatment, treatment modality may impact financial burdens experienced by patients with kidney failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Toxicity in ESKD.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey M Maclay, Kyle Woodward, Natalie Strohmayer, Miko E Yu, Sumit Mohan, Anne M Huml, Syed Ali Husain\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with kidney failure require treatments that are demanding and time-intensive, potentially interfering with employability and leading to indirect costs. We sought to characterize the prevalence of, and risk factors for financial toxicity among patients with kidney failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of 112 participants with kidney failure at a large, urban, academic medical center. Financial toxicity was assessed via a survey which included the validated CoST tool as well as additional items to evaluate self-reported changes to material conditions and financial coping behaviors. Participants were grouped according to kidney replacement therapy modality (dialysis, transplant after dialysis, or preemptive transplant) Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population and to compare those with above-median vs below-medial CoST scores, and by modality of kidney replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median CoST score was 17 with 71% of participants experiencing at least mild financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity were less likely to have White race, and more likely to be receiving dialysis. Over half of participants reported reduction in employment (61%) or income (57%) following kidney failure onset with the greatest likelihood of these among participants with any dialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with kidney failure experience significant financial toxicity as measured by the CoST score and report significant negative changes in employment and income. Although this toxicity persists through many stages of treatment, treatment modality may impact financial burdens experienced by patients with kidney failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾衰竭患者需要耗费大量时间的治疗,这可能会影响其就业能力并导致间接成本。我们试图描述肾衰竭患者财务毒性的患病率和危险因素。方法:我们在一个大型城市学术医疗中心对112名肾功能衰竭患者进行了横断面调查研究。财务毒性通过一项调查进行评估,该调查包括经过验证的成本工具以及评估自我报告的物质条件变化和财务应对行为的附加项目。参与者根据肾脏替代治疗方式(透析、透析后移植或抢先移植)进行分组,描述性统计用于总结研究人群的人口学和临床特征,并比较高于中位数和低于医疗成本评分的人群,以及肾脏替代治疗的方式。结果:中位成本得分为17,71%的参与者至少经历了轻微的财务毒性。经历财务毒性的参与者不太可能是白人,更有可能接受透析。超过一半的参与者报告在肾衰竭发作后就业减少(61%)或收入减少(57%),其中有任何透析的参与者最有可能出现这种情况。结论:肾衰竭的成年人经历了显著的财务毒性,通过成本评分来衡量,并报告了就业和收入的显著负变化。尽管这种毒性在许多治疗阶段持续存在,但治疗方式可能会影响肾衰竭患者的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Toxicity in ESKD.

Background: Patients with kidney failure require treatments that are demanding and time-intensive, potentially interfering with employability and leading to indirect costs. We sought to characterize the prevalence of, and risk factors for financial toxicity among patients with kidney failure.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of 112 participants with kidney failure at a large, urban, academic medical center. Financial toxicity was assessed via a survey which included the validated CoST tool as well as additional items to evaluate self-reported changes to material conditions and financial coping behaviors. Participants were grouped according to kidney replacement therapy modality (dialysis, transplant after dialysis, or preemptive transplant) Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population and to compare those with above-median vs below-medial CoST scores, and by modality of kidney replacement therapy.

Results: Median CoST score was 17 with 71% of participants experiencing at least mild financial toxicity. Participants experiencing financial toxicity were less likely to have White race, and more likely to be receiving dialysis. Over half of participants reported reduction in employment (61%) or income (57%) following kidney failure onset with the greatest likelihood of these among participants with any dialysis.

Conclusions: Adults with kidney failure experience significant financial toxicity as measured by the CoST score and report significant negative changes in employment and income. Although this toxicity persists through many stages of treatment, treatment modality may impact financial burdens experienced by patients with kidney failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信