前列腺通路嵌入比较试验:帝国前列腺3-前列腺通路嵌入比较试验的试验阶段的结果。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Edward James Bass, Francesca Rawlins, Taimur Shah, Natalia Klimowska-Nassar, Thiagarajah Sasikaran, Puja Jadav, Emma Cullen, Matyas Szigeti, Francesca Fiorentino, Matt R Sydes, Matt Winkler, Nimalan Arumainayagam, Alvan Pope, Heminder Sokhi, Mariam Nasseri, Hashim Uddin Ahmed
{"title":"前列腺通路嵌入比较试验:帝国前列腺3-前列腺通路嵌入比较试验的试验阶段的结果。","authors":"Edward James Bass, Francesca Rawlins, Taimur Shah, Natalia Klimowska-Nassar, Thiagarajah Sasikaran, Puja Jadav, Emma Cullen, Matyas Szigeti, Francesca Fiorentino, Matt R Sydes, Matt Winkler, Nimalan Arumainayagam, Alvan Pope, Heminder Sokhi, Mariam Nasseri, Hashim Uddin Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Rapid innovations in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to the adoption of innovative trial designs. The Imperial Prostate 3-PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial (IP3-PROSPECT) aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design within the prostate cancer pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were approached at the point of referral for a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and were invited to join the cohort, agreeing in principle to future randomisations, without knowledge of the details of those interventions. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires at baseline and follow-up visits, providing valuable insights into their experiences following prostate cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>IP3-PROSPECT recruited 139 participants from 384 individuals approached across four sites, meeting the primary endpoint with an approach rate of 35.3%. Recruitment outcomes demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting patients to the cmRCT cohort within the prostate cancer pathway, with high completion rates for PROM questionnaires observed throughout the study visits. Participants and health care professionals expressed favourable views towards the design, acknowledging its potential advantages over traditional trial designs. Sufficient interventions that span the prostate pathway so that the potential large number of participants could be involved in answering research questions as well as the need to optimise recruitment strategies were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>IP3-PROSPECT provides valuable insights into the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a cmRCT design within the prostate cancer pathway. Future research will evaluate the effectiveness of the cmRCT design in generating comparative effectiveness data for prostate cancer interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: Outcomes from the Pilot Phase of the Imperial Prostate 3-PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Edward James Bass, Francesca Rawlins, Taimur Shah, Natalia Klimowska-Nassar, Thiagarajah Sasikaran, Puja Jadav, Emma Cullen, Matyas Szigeti, Francesca Fiorentino, Matt R Sydes, Matt Winkler, Nimalan Arumainayagam, Alvan Pope, Heminder Sokhi, Mariam Nasseri, Hashim Uddin Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Rapid innovations in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to the adoption of innovative trial designs. The Imperial Prostate 3-PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial (IP3-PROSPECT) aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design within the prostate cancer pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were approached at the point of referral for a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and were invited to join the cohort, agreeing in principle to future randomisations, without knowledge of the details of those interventions. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires at baseline and follow-up visits, providing valuable insights into their experiences following prostate cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>IP3-PROSPECT recruited 139 participants from 384 individuals approached across four sites, meeting the primary endpoint with an approach rate of 35.3%. Recruitment outcomes demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting patients to the cmRCT cohort within the prostate cancer pathway, with high completion rates for PROM questionnaires observed throughout the study visits. Participants and health care professionals expressed favourable views towards the design, acknowledging its potential advantages over traditional trial designs. Sufficient interventions that span the prostate pathway so that the potential large number of participants could be involved in answering research questions as well as the need to optimise recruitment strategies were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>IP3-PROSPECT provides valuable insights into the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a cmRCT design within the prostate cancer pathway. Future research will evaluate the effectiveness of the cmRCT design in generating comparative effectiveness data for prostate cancer interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:前列腺癌诊断和治疗的快速创新导致采用创新的试验设计。帝国前列腺3-前列腺通路嵌入式比较试验(IP3-PROSPECT)旨在探讨前列腺癌通路中队列多重随机对照试验(cmRCT)设计的可行性和可接受性。方法:在临床怀疑前列腺癌的转诊点接触符合条件的参与者,并邀请他们加入队列,原则上同意未来的随机化,而不知道这些干预措施的细节。患者在基线和随访时完成了患者报告的结果测量(PROM)问卷调查,为他们在前列腺癌诊断后的经历提供了有价值的见解。主要发现和局限性:IP3-PROSPECT从四个地点的384名患者中招募了139名参与者,达到了主要终点,接近率为35.3%。招募结果表明,在前列腺癌通路内招募患者到cmRCT队列是可行的,在整个研究访问中观察到PROM问卷的高完成率。参与者和卫生保健专业人员对该设计表示赞同,承认其比传统试验设计有潜在优势。充分的干预措施跨越前列腺途径,以便潜在的大量参与者可以参与回答研究问题以及优化招募策略的需要。结论和临床意义:IP3-PROSPECT为在前列腺癌通路中实施cmRCT设计的可行性和可接受性提供了有价值的见解。未来的研究将评估cmRCT设计在生成前列腺癌干预的比较有效性数据方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prostate Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial: Outcomes from the Pilot Phase of the Imperial Prostate 3-PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial.

Background and objective: Rapid innovations in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to the adoption of innovative trial designs. The Imperial Prostate 3-PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial (IP3-PROSPECT) aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design within the prostate cancer pathway.

Methods: Eligible participants were approached at the point of referral for a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and were invited to join the cohort, agreeing in principle to future randomisations, without knowledge of the details of those interventions. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires at baseline and follow-up visits, providing valuable insights into their experiences following prostate cancer diagnosis.

Key findings and limitations: IP3-PROSPECT recruited 139 participants from 384 individuals approached across four sites, meeting the primary endpoint with an approach rate of 35.3%. Recruitment outcomes demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting patients to the cmRCT cohort within the prostate cancer pathway, with high completion rates for PROM questionnaires observed throughout the study visits. Participants and health care professionals expressed favourable views towards the design, acknowledging its potential advantages over traditional trial designs. Sufficient interventions that span the prostate pathway so that the potential large number of participants could be involved in answering research questions as well as the need to optimise recruitment strategies were identified.

Conclusions and clinical implications: IP3-PROSPECT provides valuable insights into the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a cmRCT design within the prostate cancer pathway. Future research will evaluate the effectiveness of the cmRCT design in generating comparative effectiveness data for prostate cancer interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信