Keith A Rodvold, Mark H Gotfried, Philip Sabato, Tim Henkel, Paul C McGovern
{"title":"头孢吡肟和坦尼波巴坦在健康成人中的血浆和肺内药代动力学。","authors":"Keith A Rodvold, Mark H Gotfried, Philip Sabato, Tim Henkel, Paul C McGovern","doi":"10.1128/aac.00493-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cefepime-taniborbactam is being developed for the treatment of serious multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. This study determined and compared plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam in 30 healthy adult participants. The dosing regimen was 2 g cefepime/0.5 g taniborbactam administered as a 4 h intravenous infusion every 8 h for a total of six doses. Mean plasma and ELF concentration values with the four aspirates at each bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling time (1, 3, 4.25, 5, 6, and 8 h) were used to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0-8</sub>). The mean AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values of unbound plasma concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam were 262.2 and 84.77 µg·h/mL, respectively. The drug penetration ratios of ELF to unbound plasma concentrations (DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub>) were based on the AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values of six different BAL aspirate calculations: single aspirates (for the first, second, third, and fourth BAL sample) and pooled aspirates (BAL samples 2+3+4 and 1+2+3+4). The AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values for ELF for individual and pooled aspirates ranged from 51.62 to 97.86 µg·h/mL for cefepime and 13.14 to 21.69 µg·h/mL for taniborbactam. The DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub> ranged from 0.197 to 0.373 for cefepime and 0.153 to 0.253 for taniborbactam and was dependent on which aspirate of recovered BAL fluid was used. The highest and lowest values of AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values for ELF and DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub> for cefepime and taniborbactam were observed with aspirate 1 and aspirate 4, respectively. These results support further consideration of cefepime-taniborbactam as a potential treatment for bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible MDR Gram-negative pathogens.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04951505.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0049325"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of cefepime and taniborbactam in healthy adult participants.\",\"authors\":\"Keith A Rodvold, Mark H Gotfried, Philip Sabato, Tim Henkel, Paul C McGovern\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.00493-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cefepime-taniborbactam is being developed for the treatment of serious multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. This study determined and compared plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam in 30 healthy adult participants. The dosing regimen was 2 g cefepime/0.5 g taniborbactam administered as a 4 h intravenous infusion every 8 h for a total of six doses. Mean plasma and ELF concentration values with the four aspirates at each bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling time (1, 3, 4.25, 5, 6, and 8 h) were used to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC<sub>0-8</sub>). The mean AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values of unbound plasma concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam were 262.2 and 84.77 µg·h/mL, respectively. The drug penetration ratios of ELF to unbound plasma concentrations (DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub>) were based on the AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values of six different BAL aspirate calculations: single aspirates (for the first, second, third, and fourth BAL sample) and pooled aspirates (BAL samples 2+3+4 and 1+2+3+4). The AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values for ELF for individual and pooled aspirates ranged from 51.62 to 97.86 µg·h/mL for cefepime and 13.14 to 21.69 µg·h/mL for taniborbactam. The DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub> ranged from 0.197 to 0.373 for cefepime and 0.153 to 0.253 for taniborbactam and was dependent on which aspirate of recovered BAL fluid was used. The highest and lowest values of AUC<sub>0-8</sub> values for ELF and DPR<sub>ELF/plasma</sub> for cefepime and taniborbactam were observed with aspirate 1 and aspirate 4, respectively. These results support further consideration of cefepime-taniborbactam as a potential treatment for bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible MDR Gram-negative pathogens.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04951505.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0049325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217482/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00493-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00493-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of cefepime and taniborbactam in healthy adult participants.
Cefepime-taniborbactam is being developed for the treatment of serious multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. This study determined and compared plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam in 30 healthy adult participants. The dosing regimen was 2 g cefepime/0.5 g taniborbactam administered as a 4 h intravenous infusion every 8 h for a total of six doses. Mean plasma and ELF concentration values with the four aspirates at each bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling time (1, 3, 4.25, 5, 6, and 8 h) were used to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-8). The mean AUC0-8 values of unbound plasma concentrations of cefepime and taniborbactam were 262.2 and 84.77 µg·h/mL, respectively. The drug penetration ratios of ELF to unbound plasma concentrations (DPRELF/plasma) were based on the AUC0-8 values of six different BAL aspirate calculations: single aspirates (for the first, second, third, and fourth BAL sample) and pooled aspirates (BAL samples 2+3+4 and 1+2+3+4). The AUC0-8 values for ELF for individual and pooled aspirates ranged from 51.62 to 97.86 µg·h/mL for cefepime and 13.14 to 21.69 µg·h/mL for taniborbactam. The DPRELF/plasma ranged from 0.197 to 0.373 for cefepime and 0.153 to 0.253 for taniborbactam and was dependent on which aspirate of recovered BAL fluid was used. The highest and lowest values of AUC0-8 values for ELF and DPRELF/plasma for cefepime and taniborbactam were observed with aspirate 1 and aspirate 4, respectively. These results support further consideration of cefepime-taniborbactam as a potential treatment for bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible MDR Gram-negative pathogens.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04951505.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.