使用妊娠调整投影法进行妊娠晚期超声检查后的胎儿体重推断:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Micah Martin Vaughn-Valencia, Yan D Zhao, Rodney K Edwards, Shari Clifton, Hugh Nadeau
{"title":"使用妊娠调整投影法进行妊娠晚期超声检查后的胎儿体重推断:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Micah Martin Vaughn-Valencia, Yan D Zhao, Rodney K Edwards, Shari Clifton, Hugh Nadeau","doi":"10.1055/a-2628-2364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method of fetal weight extrapolation in the prediction of actual birth weight. Study Design A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception to June 2023. Studies were compiled that assessed accuracy of the GAP method in pregnant women at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) with an ultrasound performed at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the GAP method and the actual birth weight using the mean percent error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percent error. Means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> and tau<sup>2</sup> statistics. Results The search identified 949 records. After full text review, a total of eight studies with 5306 subjects were included. Studies were retrospective and prospective cohort studies. All studies were deemed high quality and determined to have a low risk of bias. Five studies were performed in the United States, one in Italy, one in Spain, and one in the United Kingdom. Four studies included patients with pregestational or gestational diabetes and obesity. Due to substantial heterogeneity, the random-effects model was used to estimate the effects of studies. The mean percent error was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.1-5.2%), the mean absolute error was 240 g (95% CI: 205-275 g), and the mean absolute percent error was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.9-9.1%). Conclusion The GAP method of fetal weight extrapolation is an accurate approach to birth weight prediction and is suitable for use in a diverse population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetal weight extrapolation following a third-trimester ultrasound examination using the gestation-adjusted projection method: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Micah Martin Vaughn-Valencia, Yan D Zhao, Rodney K Edwards, Shari Clifton, Hugh Nadeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2628-2364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method of fetal weight extrapolation in the prediction of actual birth weight. Study Design A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception to June 2023. Studies were compiled that assessed accuracy of the GAP method in pregnant women at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) with an ultrasound performed at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the GAP method and the actual birth weight using the mean percent error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percent error. Means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> and tau<sup>2</sup> statistics. Results The search identified 949 records. After full text review, a total of eight studies with 5306 subjects were included. Studies were retrospective and prospective cohort studies. All studies were deemed high quality and determined to have a low risk of bias. Five studies were performed in the United States, one in Italy, one in Spain, and one in the United Kingdom. Four studies included patients with pregestational or gestational diabetes and obesity. Due to substantial heterogeneity, the random-effects model was used to estimate the effects of studies. The mean percent error was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.1-5.2%), the mean absolute error was 240 g (95% CI: 205-275 g), and the mean absolute percent error was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.9-9.1%). Conclusion The GAP method of fetal weight extrapolation is an accurate approach to birth weight prediction and is suitable for use in a diverse population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2628-2364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2628-2364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用系统评价和荟萃分析方法,评价妊娠调整投影法(GAP)胎儿体重外推法预测实际出生体重的准确性。研究设计使用MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science进行系统的文献检索,检索从数据库建立到2023年6月发表的研究。收集了一些研究,评估GAP方法在妊娠34至36周进行超声检查的足月(≥37周)孕妇中的准确性。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估质量,使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险。采用平均百分比误差、平均绝对误差和平均绝对百分比误差对GAP方法与实际出生体重之间的一致性进行meta分析。计算平均值和95%置信区间(95% CI)。采用I2和tau2统计量评估研究间的异质性。结果共检索到949条记录。全文审阅后,共纳入8项研究,5306名受试者。研究包括回顾性和前瞻性队列研究。所有的研究都被认为是高质量的,并且具有低偏倚风险。五项研究在美国进行,一项在意大利,一项在西班牙,一项在英国。四项研究纳入了妊娠期或妊娠期糖尿病和肥胖症患者。由于存在很大的异质性,我们采用随机效应模型来估计研究的效果。平均百分比误差为3.1% (95% CI: 1.1 ~ 5.2%),平均绝对误差为240 g (95% CI: 205 ~ 275 g),平均绝对百分比误差为8.0% (95% CI: 6.9 ~ 9.1%)。结论GAP胎儿体重外推法是一种准确预测出生体重的方法,适用于不同人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fetal weight extrapolation following a third-trimester ultrasound examination using the gestation-adjusted projection method: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective Using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method of fetal weight extrapolation in the prediction of actual birth weight. Study Design A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception to June 2023. Studies were compiled that assessed accuracy of the GAP method in pregnant women at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) with an ultrasound performed at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the GAP method and the actual birth weight using the mean percent error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percent error. Means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I2 and tau2 statistics. Results The search identified 949 records. After full text review, a total of eight studies with 5306 subjects were included. Studies were retrospective and prospective cohort studies. All studies were deemed high quality and determined to have a low risk of bias. Five studies were performed in the United States, one in Italy, one in Spain, and one in the United Kingdom. Four studies included patients with pregestational or gestational diabetes and obesity. Due to substantial heterogeneity, the random-effects model was used to estimate the effects of studies. The mean percent error was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.1-5.2%), the mean absolute error was 240 g (95% CI: 205-275 g), and the mean absolute percent error was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.9-9.1%). Conclusion The GAP method of fetal weight extrapolation is an accurate approach to birth weight prediction and is suitable for use in a diverse population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信