基于生命周期理论的不同类型乡村聚落的振兴路径——以华北农牧交错带某乡为例

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Yafeng Zou , Chengfeng Yi , Feng Luo , Pingping Du , Haiying Liu , Tian Chen , Yan Song , Pinqi Wu , Yu Zhou
{"title":"基于生命周期理论的不同类型乡村聚落的振兴路径——以华北农牧交错带某乡为例","authors":"Yafeng Zou ,&nbsp;Chengfeng Yi ,&nbsp;Feng Luo ,&nbsp;Pingping Du ,&nbsp;Haiying Liu ,&nbsp;Tian Chen ,&nbsp;Yan Song ,&nbsp;Pinqi Wu ,&nbsp;Yu Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The scientific classification of rural settlements types and the formulation of realistic revitalization development paths are essential for rural revitalization. Rural settlements show obvious life cycle characteristics in their development process, and it is necessary to formulate differentiated revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. Therefore, a case study is conducted in Ke Town, farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China, based on life cycle theory. This paper evaluates the current situation of rural settlements from the perspective of “factors-functions”. Through social network analysis, the connection strength and degree centrality are measured for rural settlements, and classifies them into five types accordingly. And we introduce the life cycle theory to delineate the development stages of different types of rural settlements. Finally, we identify the advantageous factors of rural settlements and analyze the characteristics of inter-village population mobility by means of triangular model and field research. We use this as a guide to formulate revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. The results show that the “factors-functions” spatial correlation network is characterized by obvious spatial differences, where rural settlements show weaker connection strength and higher degree centrality. Analyzing the combination of connection strength and degree centrality, rural settlements are classified into five types: suburban integration (11.11 %), characteristic protection (5.00 %), agglomeration and upgrading (16.11 %), maintaining status quo (26.67 %), and relocation merge (41.11 %). Meanwhile, rural settlements are divided into four stages: growth, maturity, decline, and transformation. We focus on the characteristics of different types of rural settlements at different stages and propose multiple revitalization paths. It can effectively solve the development dilemma of rural settlements in the region caused by differences in resource endowment and ambiguous functional positioning. This paper provides theoretical guidance for classifying the rural settlements types and formulating rural revitalization paths in the farming-pastoral ecotone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103461"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements based on life cycle theory: A case study of a township in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China\",\"authors\":\"Yafeng Zou ,&nbsp;Chengfeng Yi ,&nbsp;Feng Luo ,&nbsp;Pingping Du ,&nbsp;Haiying Liu ,&nbsp;Tian Chen ,&nbsp;Yan Song ,&nbsp;Pinqi Wu ,&nbsp;Yu Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The scientific classification of rural settlements types and the formulation of realistic revitalization development paths are essential for rural revitalization. Rural settlements show obvious life cycle characteristics in their development process, and it is necessary to formulate differentiated revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. Therefore, a case study is conducted in Ke Town, farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China, based on life cycle theory. This paper evaluates the current situation of rural settlements from the perspective of “factors-functions”. Through social network analysis, the connection strength and degree centrality are measured for rural settlements, and classifies them into five types accordingly. And we introduce the life cycle theory to delineate the development stages of different types of rural settlements. Finally, we identify the advantageous factors of rural settlements and analyze the characteristics of inter-village population mobility by means of triangular model and field research. We use this as a guide to formulate revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. The results show that the “factors-functions” spatial correlation network is characterized by obvious spatial differences, where rural settlements show weaker connection strength and higher degree centrality. Analyzing the combination of connection strength and degree centrality, rural settlements are classified into five types: suburban integration (11.11 %), characteristic protection (5.00 %), agglomeration and upgrading (16.11 %), maintaining status quo (26.67 %), and relocation merge (41.11 %). Meanwhile, rural settlements are divided into four stages: growth, maturity, decline, and transformation. We focus on the characteristics of different types of rural settlements at different stages and propose multiple revitalization paths. It can effectively solve the development dilemma of rural settlements in the region caused by differences in resource endowment and ambiguous functional positioning. This paper provides theoretical guidance for classifying the rural settlements types and formulating rural revitalization paths in the farming-pastoral ecotone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525001778\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525001778","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学划分乡村聚落类型,制定现实的乡村振兴发展路径,是乡村振兴的必要条件。乡村聚落在发展过程中表现出明显的生命周期特征,不同类型乡村聚落有必要制定差异化的振兴路径。基于生命周期理论,本文以中国北方农牧交错带柯镇为例进行了研究。本文从“要素-功能”的角度对农村聚落现状进行了评价。通过社会网络分析,对农村聚落的连接强度和度中心性进行测度,并将其分为五类。并引入生命周期理论对不同类型乡村聚落的发展阶段进行了划分。最后,通过三角模型和实地调研,明确了农村聚落的有利因素,分析了村际人口流动的特征。我们以此为指导,制定不同类型乡村聚落的振兴路径。结果表明:“要素-功能”空间关联网络具有明显的空间差异性,其中农村聚落的联系强度较弱,中心性较高;结合连接强度和度中心性分析,将乡村聚落划分为城郊一体化(11.11%)、特色保护(5.00 %)、集聚升级(16.11%)、维持现状(26.67%)和搬迁合并(41.11%)5种类型。同时,将乡村聚落划分为成长期、成熟期、衰退期和转型期四个阶段。我们关注不同类型乡村聚落在不同阶段的特点,提出多种乡村聚落的振兴路径。可以有效解决区域内因资源禀赋差异和功能定位不明确而造成的乡村聚落发展困境。本文为农牧交错带乡村聚落类型划分和乡村振兴路径制定提供了理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements based on life cycle theory: A case study of a township in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China
The scientific classification of rural settlements types and the formulation of realistic revitalization development paths are essential for rural revitalization. Rural settlements show obvious life cycle characteristics in their development process, and it is necessary to formulate differentiated revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. Therefore, a case study is conducted in Ke Town, farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China, based on life cycle theory. This paper evaluates the current situation of rural settlements from the perspective of “factors-functions”. Through social network analysis, the connection strength and degree centrality are measured for rural settlements, and classifies them into five types accordingly. And we introduce the life cycle theory to delineate the development stages of different types of rural settlements. Finally, we identify the advantageous factors of rural settlements and analyze the characteristics of inter-village population mobility by means of triangular model and field research. We use this as a guide to formulate revitalization paths for different types of rural settlements. The results show that the “factors-functions” spatial correlation network is characterized by obvious spatial differences, where rural settlements show weaker connection strength and higher degree centrality. Analyzing the combination of connection strength and degree centrality, rural settlements are classified into five types: suburban integration (11.11 %), characteristic protection (5.00 %), agglomeration and upgrading (16.11 %), maintaining status quo (26.67 %), and relocation merge (41.11 %). Meanwhile, rural settlements are divided into four stages: growth, maturity, decline, and transformation. We focus on the characteristics of different types of rural settlements at different stages and propose multiple revitalization paths. It can effectively solve the development dilemma of rural settlements in the region caused by differences in resource endowment and ambiguous functional positioning. This paper provides theoretical guidance for classifying the rural settlements types and formulating rural revitalization paths in the farming-pastoral ecotone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信