象牙贸易禁令和大象偷猎:使用PIKE数据和政策干预的时间分析

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Canwei Xia , Peng Liu , Xiaoge Ping , Yan Zeng , Xiaotong Shang , Qiang Dai , Li Zhang
{"title":"象牙贸易禁令和大象偷猎:使用PIKE数据和政策干预的时间分析","authors":"Canwei Xia ,&nbsp;Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoge Ping ,&nbsp;Yan Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Shang ,&nbsp;Qiang Dai ,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the effectiveness of the ivory trade bans in reducing the illegal killing of elephants by analyzing trends in the Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants (PIKE) data from 2003 to 2022. Using changepoint analysis, interrupted time series analysis, and difference-in-differences methods, we examined shifts in poaching patterns in response to key policy interventions, including the 2008 one-off ivory sale to China and Japan, and the implementation of domestic the ivory trade bans in major markets such as China and the United States after 2015. Results indicate that elephant poaching in Africa increased significantly following the 2008 sale, with PIKE peaking between 2009 and 2014. However, a significant decline in PIKE occurred after 2015, coinciding with the adoption of comprehensive national ivory bans. Comparative analysis shows no corresponding fluctuations in Asian elephant PIKE data, suggesting regional variation in poaching drivers. Additionally, an economic supply-demand model reveals that international trade bans alone are insufficient to curb poaching unless complemented by domestic market suppression. National bans reduce consumer demand and disrupt laundering opportunities, thereby amplifying enforcement effectiveness. The findings suggest that coordinated international agreements, when paired with stringent domestic policies, can significantly reduce elephant poaching. However, persistent illegal activity highlights the need for sustained enforcement and global cooperation. These results offer empirical support for ongoing trade restrictions and underscore the importance of consumer-side interventions in wildlife conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article e03658"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ivory trade bans and elephant poaching: A temporal analysis using PIKE data and policy interventions\",\"authors\":\"Canwei Xia ,&nbsp;Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoge Ping ,&nbsp;Yan Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Shang ,&nbsp;Qiang Dai ,&nbsp;Li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates the effectiveness of the ivory trade bans in reducing the illegal killing of elephants by analyzing trends in the Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants (PIKE) data from 2003 to 2022. Using changepoint analysis, interrupted time series analysis, and difference-in-differences methods, we examined shifts in poaching patterns in response to key policy interventions, including the 2008 one-off ivory sale to China and Japan, and the implementation of domestic the ivory trade bans in major markets such as China and the United States after 2015. Results indicate that elephant poaching in Africa increased significantly following the 2008 sale, with PIKE peaking between 2009 and 2014. However, a significant decline in PIKE occurred after 2015, coinciding with the adoption of comprehensive national ivory bans. Comparative analysis shows no corresponding fluctuations in Asian elephant PIKE data, suggesting regional variation in poaching drivers. Additionally, an economic supply-demand model reveals that international trade bans alone are insufficient to curb poaching unless complemented by domestic market suppression. National bans reduce consumer demand and disrupt laundering opportunities, thereby amplifying enforcement effectiveness. The findings suggest that coordinated international agreements, when paired with stringent domestic policies, can significantly reduce elephant poaching. However, persistent illegal activity highlights the need for sustained enforcement and global cooperation. These results offer empirical support for ongoing trade restrictions and underscore the importance of consumer-side interventions in wildlife conservation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002598\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过分析2003年至2022年非法猎杀大象比例(PIKE)数据的趋势,评估了象牙贸易禁令在减少非法猎杀大象方面的有效性。利用变化点分析、中断时间序列分析和差异中的差异方法,我们研究了偷猎模式在关键政策干预下的变化,包括2008年对中国和日本的一次性象牙销售,以及2015年后中国和美国等主要市场实施的国内象牙贸易禁令。研究结果表明,在2008年象牙出售后,非洲的大象偷猎行为显著增加,其中派克在2009年至2014年达到顶峰。然而,在2015年之后,派克的数量大幅下降,恰逢各国全面实施象牙禁令。对比分析显示,亚洲象PIKE数据没有相应的波动,表明偷猎驱动因素存在区域差异。此外,经济供需模型表明,除非辅以国内市场抑制,否则仅靠国际贸易禁令不足以遏制偷猎。国家禁令减少了消费者需求,破坏了洗钱机会,从而提高了执法效率。研究结果表明,协调一致的国际协议,加上严格的国内政策,可以显著减少大象偷猎。然而,持续的非法活动凸显了持续执法和全球合作的必要性。这些结果为现行的贸易限制提供了实证支持,并强调了消费者方面干预野生动物保护的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ivory trade bans and elephant poaching: A temporal analysis using PIKE data and policy interventions
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the ivory trade bans in reducing the illegal killing of elephants by analyzing trends in the Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants (PIKE) data from 2003 to 2022. Using changepoint analysis, interrupted time series analysis, and difference-in-differences methods, we examined shifts in poaching patterns in response to key policy interventions, including the 2008 one-off ivory sale to China and Japan, and the implementation of domestic the ivory trade bans in major markets such as China and the United States after 2015. Results indicate that elephant poaching in Africa increased significantly following the 2008 sale, with PIKE peaking between 2009 and 2014. However, a significant decline in PIKE occurred after 2015, coinciding with the adoption of comprehensive national ivory bans. Comparative analysis shows no corresponding fluctuations in Asian elephant PIKE data, suggesting regional variation in poaching drivers. Additionally, an economic supply-demand model reveals that international trade bans alone are insufficient to curb poaching unless complemented by domestic market suppression. National bans reduce consumer demand and disrupt laundering opportunities, thereby amplifying enforcement effectiveness. The findings suggest that coordinated international agreements, when paired with stringent domestic policies, can significantly reduce elephant poaching. However, persistent illegal activity highlights the need for sustained enforcement and global cooperation. These results offer empirical support for ongoing trade restrictions and underscore the importance of consumer-side interventions in wildlife conservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信