左束支区起搏器植入术后鼻中隔瘢痕的特征。

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1111/pace.15211
Ilya Y Shadrin, David C Wendell, Fawaz Alenezi, Sara A Coles, Sana M Al-Khatib, Zak Loring, Jonathan P Piccini, Albert Y Sun, Donald D Hegland, Daniel J Friedman
{"title":"左束支区起搏器植入术后鼻中隔瘢痕的特征。","authors":"Ilya Y Shadrin, David C Wendell, Fawaz Alenezi, Sara A Coles, Sana M Al-Khatib, Zak Loring, Jonathan P Piccini, Albert Y Sun, Donald D Hegland, Daniel J Friedman","doi":"10.1111/pace.15211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly used in patients with a ventricular pacing indication but necessitates precise septal localization. The resulting effects of intraoperative lead repositioning on septal fibrosis remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in patients with LBBAP pacemakers and evaluate the septal myocardium via cMRI following LBBAP implantation compared with standard RV endocardial pacing (RVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged > 18 y.o. with bradycardia, LBBAP or RVP implant from 2021 to 2023, and at least one cMRI after implant were identified. LBBAP versus RVP was verified per established criteria. Delayed-enhancement cMRI and native T1 relaxation times were used to characterize myocardial scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 patients were identified-20 with LBBAP implants (9 with matched pre-implant cMRI) and 14 with RVP implants (3 with matched pre-implant cMRI)-with no evidence of ventricular septal defects post-implant. LBBAP lead parameters were stable pre-/post-cMRI and out to 9 months. Comparing pre- versus post-implant cMRIs (median 579 days apart), 1/9 patients following LBBAP showed a new scar on the RV inferoseptal side directly adjacent to the pacing lead on post-implant cMRI, suggestive of potential implant-related scarring with LBBAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMRI appears safe for patients with LBBAP pacemakers, with stable short- and long-term device parameters. In patients with matched pre/post-implant cMRIs, the new septal scar can be identified with LBBAP implantation, raising the possibility of lead-related fibrosis. Larger studies are required to substantiate whether the single case of lead-related fibrosis is an exception or occurs more frequently.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"765-775"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of Septal Scar After Left Bundle Branch Area Pacemaker Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Ilya Y Shadrin, David C Wendell, Fawaz Alenezi, Sara A Coles, Sana M Al-Khatib, Zak Loring, Jonathan P Piccini, Albert Y Sun, Donald D Hegland, Daniel J Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly used in patients with a ventricular pacing indication but necessitates precise septal localization. The resulting effects of intraoperative lead repositioning on septal fibrosis remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in patients with LBBAP pacemakers and evaluate the septal myocardium via cMRI following LBBAP implantation compared with standard RV endocardial pacing (RVP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged > 18 y.o. with bradycardia, LBBAP or RVP implant from 2021 to 2023, and at least one cMRI after implant were identified. LBBAP versus RVP was verified per established criteria. Delayed-enhancement cMRI and native T1 relaxation times were used to characterize myocardial scar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 patients were identified-20 with LBBAP implants (9 with matched pre-implant cMRI) and 14 with RVP implants (3 with matched pre-implant cMRI)-with no evidence of ventricular septal defects post-implant. LBBAP lead parameters were stable pre-/post-cMRI and out to 9 months. Comparing pre- versus post-implant cMRIs (median 579 days apart), 1/9 patients following LBBAP showed a new scar on the RV inferoseptal side directly adjacent to the pacing lead on post-implant cMRI, suggestive of potential implant-related scarring with LBBAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMRI appears safe for patients with LBBAP pacemakers, with stable short- and long-term device parameters. In patients with matched pre/post-implant cMRIs, the new septal scar can be identified with LBBAP implantation, raising the possibility of lead-related fibrosis. Larger studies are required to substantiate whether the single case of lead-related fibrosis is an exception or occurs more frequently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"765-775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)越来越多地用于有心室起搏适应症的患者,但需要精确的间隔定位。术中导联复位对室间隔纤维化的影响尚不清楚。目的:评价LBBAP起搏器植入患者心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)的安全性,并与标准RV心内膜起搏(RVP)相比,通过cMRI评估LBBAP植入后的室间隔心肌。方法:对2021年至2023年间伴有心动过缓、LBBAP或RVP植入且植入后至少1次cMRI的患者进行筛查,年龄为bb0 ~ 18岁。根据既定标准验证LBBAP与RVP。延迟增强cMRI和原生T1松弛时间用于表征心肌瘢痕。结果:共有34例患者被确定,其中20例使用LBBAP植入物(9例使用匹配的植入前cMRI), 14例使用RVP植入物(3例使用匹配的植入前cMRI),植入后没有室间隔缺损的证据。LBBAP导联参数在cmri前后和9个月时稳定。对比植入前后的cMRI(中位间隔579天),1/9的LBBAP患者在植入后cMRI上显示右心室间隔侧紧邻起搏导联的新瘢痕,提示LBBAP可能与植入相关。结论:CMRI对LBBAP起搏器患者是安全的,具有稳定的短期和长期设备参数。在植入前/植入后cmri匹配的患者中,新的间隔疤痕可以被识别为LBBAP植入,增加了铅相关纤维化的可能性。需要更大规模的研究来证实单个铅相关纤维化病例是例外还是更频繁发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of Septal Scar After Left Bundle Branch Area Pacemaker Implantation.

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly used in patients with a ventricular pacing indication but necessitates precise septal localization. The resulting effects of intraoperative lead repositioning on septal fibrosis remain unknown.

Objective: To assess the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in patients with LBBAP pacemakers and evaluate the septal myocardium via cMRI following LBBAP implantation compared with standard RV endocardial pacing (RVP).

Methods: Patients aged > 18 y.o. with bradycardia, LBBAP or RVP implant from 2021 to 2023, and at least one cMRI after implant were identified. LBBAP versus RVP was verified per established criteria. Delayed-enhancement cMRI and native T1 relaxation times were used to characterize myocardial scar.

Results: A total of 34 patients were identified-20 with LBBAP implants (9 with matched pre-implant cMRI) and 14 with RVP implants (3 with matched pre-implant cMRI)-with no evidence of ventricular septal defects post-implant. LBBAP lead parameters were stable pre-/post-cMRI and out to 9 months. Comparing pre- versus post-implant cMRIs (median 579 days apart), 1/9 patients following LBBAP showed a new scar on the RV inferoseptal side directly adjacent to the pacing lead on post-implant cMRI, suggestive of potential implant-related scarring with LBBAP.

Conclusion: CMRI appears safe for patients with LBBAP pacemakers, with stable short- and long-term device parameters. In patients with matched pre/post-implant cMRIs, the new septal scar can be identified with LBBAP implantation, raising the possibility of lead-related fibrosis. Larger studies are required to substantiate whether the single case of lead-related fibrosis is an exception or occurs more frequently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信