重复经颅磁刺激治疗外伤性脑损伤:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_926_2024
Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Mohmmed Saud AlShammri, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa, Abdulmonem Ali Alhussain, Abbas Al Mutair
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激治疗外伤性脑损伤:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Mohmmed Saud AlShammri, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa, Abdulmonem Ali Alhussain, Abbas Al Mutair","doi":"10.25259/SNI_926_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an injury resulting from external force exerted directly or indirectly on the skull. This is presently the major cause of mortality and disability among youth globally. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was proposed for the treatment of various neurological disorders such as TBI. We conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of rTMS in TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted our database searching on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception till August 2024 to look for articles that fulfil our aim. The search strategy was based on two main keywords: \"Transcranial magnetic stimulation\" AND \"Traumatic brain injury.\" We conducted the pooled analysis of continuous variables using standardized mean difference (SMD) due to difference in measurement scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials were included. A statistically significant improvement in cognitive function was observed after rTMS compared to control group with SMD of 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 1.14, <i>P</i> = 0.002) with non-significant heterogeneity, and pain with SMD of -0.57 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.11, <i>P</i> = 0.01), I<sup>2</sup> = 64%, <i>P</i> = 0.04. However, no difference was observed between the two groups regarding depression with SMD of -0.1 (95% CI: -0.54, 0.35, <i>P</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of rTMS is associated with improved cognitive functions and reduction in pain. No effect was observed regarding depression but future studies are still warranted in this important clinical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"16 ","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Mohmmed Saud AlShammri, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa, Abdulmonem Ali Alhussain, Abbas Al Mutair\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_926_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an injury resulting from external force exerted directly or indirectly on the skull. This is presently the major cause of mortality and disability among youth globally. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was proposed for the treatment of various neurological disorders such as TBI. We conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of rTMS in TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted our database searching on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception till August 2024 to look for articles that fulfil our aim. The search strategy was based on two main keywords: \\\"Transcranial magnetic stimulation\\\" AND \\\"Traumatic brain injury.\\\" We conducted the pooled analysis of continuous variables using standardized mean difference (SMD) due to difference in measurement scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials were included. A statistically significant improvement in cognitive function was observed after rTMS compared to control group with SMD of 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 1.14, <i>P</i> = 0.002) with non-significant heterogeneity, and pain with SMD of -0.57 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.11, <i>P</i> = 0.01), I<sup>2</sup> = 64%, <i>P</i> = 0.04. However, no difference was observed between the two groups regarding depression with SMD of -0.1 (95% CI: -0.54, 0.35, <i>P</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of rTMS is associated with improved cognitive functions and reduction in pain. No effect was observed regarding depression but future studies are still warranted in this important clinical field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_926_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_926_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外伤性脑损伤(Traumatic brain injury, TBI)是一种由外力直接或间接作用于颅骨造成的损伤。这是目前全球青年死亡和残疾的主要原因。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)被提出用于治疗各种神经系统疾病,如创伤性脑损伤。我们进行了当前的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以调查rTMS对TBI患者的疗效。方法:我们对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science从成立到2024年8月进行了数据库检索,寻找符合我们目标的文章。搜索策略基于两个主要关键词:“经颅磁刺激”和“创伤性脑损伤”。由于测量量表的差异,我们使用标准化平均差(SMD)对连续变量进行合并分析。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验。与SMD为0.7(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.25, 1.14, P = 0.002)的对照组相比,rTMS后认知功能的改善具有统计学意义,且异质性不显著,SMD组疼痛为-0.57 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.11, P = 0.01), I2 = 64%, P = 0.04。然而,两组间在抑郁伴SMD为-0.1方面没有差异(95% CI: -0.54, 0.35, P = 0.67)。结论:rTMS的使用与认知功能的改善和疼痛的减轻有关。没有观察到对抑郁症的影响,但在这个重要的临床领域,未来的研究仍然是有保证的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an injury resulting from external force exerted directly or indirectly on the skull. This is presently the major cause of mortality and disability among youth globally. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was proposed for the treatment of various neurological disorders such as TBI. We conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of rTMS in TBI patients.

Methods: We conducted our database searching on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception till August 2024 to look for articles that fulfil our aim. The search strategy was based on two main keywords: "Transcranial magnetic stimulation" AND "Traumatic brain injury." We conducted the pooled analysis of continuous variables using standardized mean difference (SMD) due to difference in measurement scales.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials were included. A statistically significant improvement in cognitive function was observed after rTMS compared to control group with SMD of 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 1.14, P = 0.002) with non-significant heterogeneity, and pain with SMD of -0.57 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.11, P = 0.01), I2 = 64%, P = 0.04. However, no difference was observed between the two groups regarding depression with SMD of -0.1 (95% CI: -0.54, 0.35, P = 0.67).

Conclusion: The use of rTMS is associated with improved cognitive functions and reduction in pain. No effect was observed regarding depression but future studies are still warranted in this important clinical field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信