不同靶向治疗对中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者的比较疗效:系统评价/网络荟萃分析和机制综述

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Youran Dai, Wenhui Yang, Li Xu, Pingting Pan, Shan Liu, Yingzhe Sun, Suying Hu, Qiushuang Li, Fang Hu
{"title":"不同靶向治疗对中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者的比较疗效:系统评价/网络荟萃分析和机制综述","authors":"Youran Dai, Wenhui Yang, Li Xu, Pingting Pan, Shan Liu, Yingzhe Sun, Suying Hu, Qiushuang Li, Fang Hu","doi":"10.1002/prp2.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ongoing evaluations of targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) continue to unfold, with the emergence of novel drugs. However, head-to-head trials comparing these therapies are still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effects of targeted therapies in moderate-to-severe UC. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were searched from the inception to November 12, 2024. Statistical analyses included multivariate random effects models and Bayesian modeling. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Outcomes such as clinical response/remission, endoscopic remission, mucosal healing, quality of life, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were used to quantify the relative therapeutic effects. Thirty-three studies (33 reported on the induction phase; 13 reported on the maintenance phase) were identified. In the induction phase, Upadacitinib 45 mg demonstrated the highest efficacy in achieving clinical remission (OR 10.03; 95% CI, 4.83-20.80), clinical response (OR 7.96; 95% CI, 3.89-16.28), and mucosal healing rate (OR 8.91; 95% CI, 3.36-23.62). Cobitolimod 250 mg was the first-ranked treatment (SUCRA, 92.67%) in Endoscopic remission. Vedolizumab 108 mg was the best dosage in reducing Adverse Events (AEs). The optimal dosage for reducing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) was found to be Tulisokibart 1000/500 mg. During the maintenance phase, Etrasimod 2 mg/kg ranked first in clinical remission (OR 9.58; 95% CI, 2.82-32.59), and Upadacitinib 45 mg was superior in endoscopic remission. Additionally, the most effective medication for raising quality of life was Guselkumab 200 mg (OR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.70-5.40). Consequently, there is a need for further high-quality research to conclusively determine the best therapeutic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":19948,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","volume":"13 3","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Different Targeted Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review/Network Meta-Analysis and Mechanistic Overview.\",\"authors\":\"Youran Dai, Wenhui Yang, Li Xu, Pingting Pan, Shan Liu, Yingzhe Sun, Suying Hu, Qiushuang Li, Fang Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prp2.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ongoing evaluations of targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) continue to unfold, with the emergence of novel drugs. However, head-to-head trials comparing these therapies are still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effects of targeted therapies in moderate-to-severe UC. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were searched from the inception to November 12, 2024. Statistical analyses included multivariate random effects models and Bayesian modeling. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Outcomes such as clinical response/remission, endoscopic remission, mucosal healing, quality of life, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were used to quantify the relative therapeutic effects. Thirty-three studies (33 reported on the induction phase; 13 reported on the maintenance phase) were identified. In the induction phase, Upadacitinib 45 mg demonstrated the highest efficacy in achieving clinical remission (OR 10.03; 95% CI, 4.83-20.80), clinical response (OR 7.96; 95% CI, 3.89-16.28), and mucosal healing rate (OR 8.91; 95% CI, 3.36-23.62). Cobitolimod 250 mg was the first-ranked treatment (SUCRA, 92.67%) in Endoscopic remission. Vedolizumab 108 mg was the best dosage in reducing Adverse Events (AEs). The optimal dosage for reducing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) was found to be Tulisokibart 1000/500 mg. During the maintenance phase, Etrasimod 2 mg/kg ranked first in clinical remission (OR 9.58; 95% CI, 2.82-32.59), and Upadacitinib 45 mg was superior in endoscopic remission. Additionally, the most effective medication for raising quality of life was Guselkumab 200 mg (OR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.70-5.40). Consequently, there is a need for further high-quality research to conclusively determine the best therapeutic option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"e70108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Research & Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着新药的出现,对中重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)靶向治疗的持续评估继续展开。然而,比较这些疗法的正面试验仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是探讨靶向治疗对中重度UC的治疗效果。Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed和Embase从开始到2024年11月12日进行了搜索。统计分析包括多元随机效应模型和贝叶斯模型。还进行了分层分析和敏感性分析。采用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。临床反应/缓解、内镜下缓解、粘膜愈合、生活质量、不良事件(ae)和严重不良事件(SAEs)等结果用于量化相对治疗效果。33项研究(33项报告了诱导阶段;确定了13个关于维修阶段的报告)。在诱导期,upadacitini45mg在实现临床缓解方面表现出最高的疗效(OR 10.03;95% CI, 4.83-20.80),临床反应(OR 7.96;95% CI, 3.89-16.28)和粘膜愈合率(OR 8.91;95% ci, 3.36-23.62)。Cobitolimod 250 mg是内镜下缓解的首选治疗(SUCRA, 92.67%)。Vedolizumab 108mg是减少不良事件(ae)的最佳剂量。减少严重不良事件(SAEs)的最佳剂量为1000/500 mg。在维持期,伊特拉西莫德2 mg/kg在临床缓解中排名第一(OR 9.58;95% CI, 2.82-32.59), upadacitini45mg在内镜缓解方面优于upadacitini45mg。此外,提高生活质量最有效的药物是Guselkumab 200 mg (OR 3.04;95% ci, 1.70-5.40)。因此,有必要进一步进行高质量的研究,以确定最佳的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Efficacy of Different Targeted Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review/Network Meta-Analysis and Mechanistic Overview.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Targeted Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review/Network Meta-Analysis and Mechanistic Overview.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Targeted Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review/Network Meta-Analysis and Mechanistic Overview.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Targeted Therapies in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review/Network Meta-Analysis and Mechanistic Overview.

Ongoing evaluations of targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) continue to unfold, with the emergence of novel drugs. However, head-to-head trials comparing these therapies are still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effects of targeted therapies in moderate-to-severe UC. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were searched from the inception to November 12, 2024. Statistical analyses included multivariate random effects models and Bayesian modeling. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. Outcomes such as clinical response/remission, endoscopic remission, mucosal healing, quality of life, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were used to quantify the relative therapeutic effects. Thirty-three studies (33 reported on the induction phase; 13 reported on the maintenance phase) were identified. In the induction phase, Upadacitinib 45 mg demonstrated the highest efficacy in achieving clinical remission (OR 10.03; 95% CI, 4.83-20.80), clinical response (OR 7.96; 95% CI, 3.89-16.28), and mucosal healing rate (OR 8.91; 95% CI, 3.36-23.62). Cobitolimod 250 mg was the first-ranked treatment (SUCRA, 92.67%) in Endoscopic remission. Vedolizumab 108 mg was the best dosage in reducing Adverse Events (AEs). The optimal dosage for reducing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) was found to be Tulisokibart 1000/500 mg. During the maintenance phase, Etrasimod 2 mg/kg ranked first in clinical remission (OR 9.58; 95% CI, 2.82-32.59), and Upadacitinib 45 mg was superior in endoscopic remission. Additionally, the most effective medication for raising quality of life was Guselkumab 200 mg (OR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.70-5.40). Consequently, there is a need for further high-quality research to conclusively determine the best therapeutic option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PR&P is jointly published by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET), the British Pharmacological Society (BPS), and Wiley. PR&P is a bi-monthly open access journal that publishes a range of article types, including: target validation (preclinical papers that show a hypothesis is incorrect or papers on drugs that have failed in early clinical development); drug discovery reviews (strategy, hypotheses, and data resulting in a successful therapeutic drug); frontiers in translational medicine (drug and target validation for an unmet therapeutic need); pharmacological hypotheses (reviews that are oriented to inform a novel hypothesis); and replication studies (work that refutes key findings [failed replication] and work that validates key findings). PR&P publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from the journals of ASPET and the BPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信