围手术期认知训练的术后效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Rong-Rong Tang, Ya-Nan Lu, Si-Si Chen, Xue-Juan Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lu
{"title":"围手术期认知训练的术后效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rong-Rong Tang, Ya-Nan Lu, Si-Si Chen, Xue-Juan Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lu","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18837-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It remains unclear whether surgical persons can really benefit from cognitive training. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cognitive training in this population.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Cochrane database, from inception to September 2024, on topics related to cognitive training in surgical persons.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Eighteen studies were eventually included. compared to the control group, cognitive training group significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.94) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.95). There was improvement of anxiety (SMD: -1.87; 95% CI: -3.40, -0.35), depression (SMD: -1.17; 95% CI: -2.00, -0.34), and quality of life (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.34). However, there was no statistical significance in cognitive function scores (SMD: 0.65; 95% CI: -0.97, 2.28), memory scores (SMD: 1.09; 95% CI: -0.11, 2.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive training had a positive impact on postoperative delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and quality of life among surgical patients. The application of cognitive training should be expanded to perioperative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative outcomes of perioperative cognitive training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rong-Rong Tang, Ya-Nan Lu, Si-Si Chen, Xue-Juan Zhang, Zhao-Rong Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18837-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It remains unclear whether surgical persons can really benefit from cognitive training. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cognitive training in this population.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Cochrane database, from inception to September 2024, on topics related to cognitive training in surgical persons.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Eighteen studies were eventually included. compared to the control group, cognitive training group significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.94) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.95). There was improvement of anxiety (SMD: -1.87; 95% CI: -3.40, -0.35), depression (SMD: -1.17; 95% CI: -2.00, -0.34), and quality of life (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.34). However, there was no statistical significance in cognitive function scores (SMD: 0.65; 95% CI: -0.97, 2.28), memory scores (SMD: 1.09; 95% CI: -0.11, 2.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive training had a positive impact on postoperative delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and quality of life among surgical patients. The application of cognitive training should be expanded to perioperative patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18837-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18837-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚外科医生是否真的能从认知训练中获益。本荟萃分析是为了评估认知训练在这一人群中的效果。证据获取:在PubMed (Medline), Web of Science和Cochrane数据库四个数据库中进行文献检索,从成立到2024年9月,检索与外科人员认知训练相关的主题。证据综合:最终纳入了18项研究。与对照组相比,认知训练组术后谵妄发生率显著降低(RR: 0.72;95% CI: 0.55, 0.94)和术后认知功能障碍(RR: 0.72;95% ci: 0.54, 0.95)。焦虑有所改善(SMD: -1.87;95% CI: -3.40, -0.35),抑郁(SMD: -1.17;95% CI: -2.00, -0.34)和生活质量(SMD: 0.78;95% ci: 0.22, 1.34)。但认知功能评分差异无统计学意义(SMD: 0.65;95% CI: -0.97, 2.28),记忆评分(SMD: 1.09;95% ci: -0.11, 2.29)。结论:认知训练对手术患者术后谵妄、术后认知功能障碍、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量有积极影响。认知训练的应用应扩大到围手术期患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative outcomes of perioperative cognitive training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: It remains unclear whether surgical persons can really benefit from cognitive training. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cognitive training in this population.

Evidence acquisition: A literature search was performed in four databases: PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Cochrane database, from inception to September 2024, on topics related to cognitive training in surgical persons.

Evidence synthesis: Eighteen studies were eventually included. compared to the control group, cognitive training group significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.94) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.95). There was improvement of anxiety (SMD: -1.87; 95% CI: -3.40, -0.35), depression (SMD: -1.17; 95% CI: -2.00, -0.34), and quality of life (SMD: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.34). However, there was no statistical significance in cognitive function scores (SMD: 0.65; 95% CI: -0.97, 2.28), memory scores (SMD: 1.09; 95% CI: -0.11, 2.29).

Conclusions: Cognitive training had a positive impact on postoperative delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and quality of life among surgical patients. The application of cognitive training should be expanded to perioperative patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信