Corneel Vandelanotte, Carol Maher, Danya Hodgetts, Tasadduq Imam, Mamunur Rashid, Quyen G To, Stewart Trost
{"title":"迭代开发和beta测试对一种新型即时适应性数字体育活动干预的可用性和可接受性的影响","authors":"Corneel Vandelanotte, Carol Maher, Danya Hodgetts, Tasadduq Imam, Mamunur Rashid, Quyen G To, Stewart Trost","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The search for cost-effective population-based physical activity interventions continues. Therefore, we developed a novel just-in-time adaptive digital assistant supported by machine learning (ie, MoveMentor). Beta-testing is essential to evaluate both technical performance and user acceptance. The aim of this study was to assess app usability, acceptability, and technical performance through iterative rounds of beta-testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Insufficiently active people (age: 39.8 [10.2]; 86% female) participated in 2 rounds of beta-testing (round 1, n = 112; round 2, n = 41). Participants downloaded the digital assistant app onto their phone to use during the study period (round 1: 12 wk, round 2: 4 wk). Participants were asked complete at least 4 educational and 5 chat conversations, rate over 50 notifications, and complete an online follow-up survey at week 4 examining aspects of app usability and acceptability. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both rounds, the app demonstrated good overall usability scores (System Usability Scale: 75.3 out of 100) but lower usefulness ratings. Round 2 participants showed increased engagement with features including action plans (P < .001), educational conversations (P < .001), and personalization features (P < .001), and they appreciated the educational conversations more (P < .05). Technical issues including data syncing problems and chat limitations persisted across both rounds. The notification system received mixed feedback, though customization options in round 2 reduced complaints (12.2%-7.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app demonstrated good acceptability and usability but low usefulness. The iterative beta-testing successfully identified areas for improvement and enabled meaningful enhancements to content and user engagement features. While some technical challenges persisted, the beta-testing provided clear direction for ongoing improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Iterative Development and Beta-Testing on the Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Just-in-Time Adaptive Digital Physical Activity Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Corneel Vandelanotte, Carol Maher, Danya Hodgetts, Tasadduq Imam, Mamunur Rashid, Quyen G To, Stewart Trost\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2025-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The search for cost-effective population-based physical activity interventions continues. Therefore, we developed a novel just-in-time adaptive digital assistant supported by machine learning (ie, MoveMentor). Beta-testing is essential to evaluate both technical performance and user acceptance. The aim of this study was to assess app usability, acceptability, and technical performance through iterative rounds of beta-testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Insufficiently active people (age: 39.8 [10.2]; 86% female) participated in 2 rounds of beta-testing (round 1, n = 112; round 2, n = 41). Participants downloaded the digital assistant app onto their phone to use during the study period (round 1: 12 wk, round 2: 4 wk). Participants were asked complete at least 4 educational and 5 chat conversations, rate over 50 notifications, and complete an online follow-up survey at week 4 examining aspects of app usability and acceptability. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both rounds, the app demonstrated good overall usability scores (System Usability Scale: 75.3 out of 100) but lower usefulness ratings. Round 2 participants showed increased engagement with features including action plans (P < .001), educational conversations (P < .001), and personalization features (P < .001), and they appreciated the educational conversations more (P < .05). Technical issues including data syncing problems and chat limitations persisted across both rounds. The notification system received mixed feedback, though customization options in round 2 reduced complaints (12.2%-7.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app demonstrated good acceptability and usability but low usefulness. The iterative beta-testing successfully identified areas for improvement and enabled meaningful enhancements to content and user engagement features. While some technical challenges persisted, the beta-testing provided clear direction for ongoing improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Iterative Development and Beta-Testing on the Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Just-in-Time Adaptive Digital Physical Activity Intervention.
Background: The search for cost-effective population-based physical activity interventions continues. Therefore, we developed a novel just-in-time adaptive digital assistant supported by machine learning (ie, MoveMentor). Beta-testing is essential to evaluate both technical performance and user acceptance. The aim of this study was to assess app usability, acceptability, and technical performance through iterative rounds of beta-testing.
Methods: Insufficiently active people (age: 39.8 [10.2]; 86% female) participated in 2 rounds of beta-testing (round 1, n = 112; round 2, n = 41). Participants downloaded the digital assistant app onto their phone to use during the study period (round 1: 12 wk, round 2: 4 wk). Participants were asked complete at least 4 educational and 5 chat conversations, rate over 50 notifications, and complete an online follow-up survey at week 4 examining aspects of app usability and acceptability. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to analyze outcomes.
Results: Across both rounds, the app demonstrated good overall usability scores (System Usability Scale: 75.3 out of 100) but lower usefulness ratings. Round 2 participants showed increased engagement with features including action plans (P < .001), educational conversations (P < .001), and personalization features (P < .001), and they appreciated the educational conversations more (P < .05). Technical issues including data syncing problems and chat limitations persisted across both rounds. The notification system received mixed feedback, though customization options in round 2 reduced complaints (12.2%-7.3%).
Conclusions: The app demonstrated good acceptability and usability but low usefulness. The iterative beta-testing successfully identified areas for improvement and enabled meaningful enhancements to content and user engagement features. While some technical challenges persisted, the beta-testing provided clear direction for ongoing improvements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.