苯肾上腺素、麻黄碱和去甲肾上腺素预防和治疗剖宫产子痫前期患者脊柱性低血压的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_62_25
Ahmed S Badran, Karim S Shata, Ahmed Elgammal, Ahmed A Samir, Mostafa O Farag, Salma Allam, Ahmed Samy
{"title":"苯肾上腺素、麻黄碱和去甲肾上腺素预防和治疗剖宫产子痫前期患者脊柱性低血压的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Ahmed S Badran, Karim S Shata, Ahmed Elgammal, Ahmed A Samir, Mostafa O Farag, Salma Allam, Ahmed Samy","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_62_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Spinal-induced hypotension in parturients with pre-eclampsia (PE) can lead to adverse perinatal outcomes, making effective prophylaxis and treatment crucial. We aim to compare the prophylactic and therapeutic roles of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine (NE) in treating post-spinal hypotension in PE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of various databases up to June 2024, focusing on randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were used for continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for binary outcomes. Analyses were performed using R with both fixed-effect and random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs (804 patients) were included in the analysis. Therapeutic comparisons revealed no differences in mean arterial pressure between NE and ephedrine (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.49, 1.53) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.01, 1.82). Phenylephrine was associated with a significantly higher risk of bradycardia compared to ephedrine (OR = 14.34, 95% CI: 1.8, 113.64, <i>P</i> = 0.018), whereas NE showed an insignificant difference (OR = 2.54, 95% CI: 0.27, 23.94). NE significantly improved the umbilical artery pH compared to ephedrine (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.62, <i>P</i> = 0.036). No significant differences were identified in nausea or vomiting. Prophylactic comparisons revealed no significant differences between phenylephrine and NE for hypotension (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.22, 4.26). For bradycardia, no difference was observed between NE and ephedrine (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.002, 3.33) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.006, 74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phenylephrine, ephedrine, and NE exhibit comparable haemodynamic effects and maternal side effects, although phenylephrine increases the risk of bradycardia. NE improves umbilical artery pH.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 6","pages":"526-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine for the prevention and treatment of spinal-induced hypotension in pre-eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed S Badran, Karim S Shata, Ahmed Elgammal, Ahmed A Samir, Mostafa O Farag, Salma Allam, Ahmed Samy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_62_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Spinal-induced hypotension in parturients with pre-eclampsia (PE) can lead to adverse perinatal outcomes, making effective prophylaxis and treatment crucial. We aim to compare the prophylactic and therapeutic roles of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine (NE) in treating post-spinal hypotension in PE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of various databases up to June 2024, focusing on randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were used for continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for binary outcomes. Analyses were performed using R with both fixed-effect and random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs (804 patients) were included in the analysis. Therapeutic comparisons revealed no differences in mean arterial pressure between NE and ephedrine (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.49, 1.53) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.01, 1.82). Phenylephrine was associated with a significantly higher risk of bradycardia compared to ephedrine (OR = 14.34, 95% CI: 1.8, 113.64, <i>P</i> = 0.018), whereas NE showed an insignificant difference (OR = 2.54, 95% CI: 0.27, 23.94). NE significantly improved the umbilical artery pH compared to ephedrine (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.62, <i>P</i> = 0.036). No significant differences were identified in nausea or vomiting. Prophylactic comparisons revealed no significant differences between phenylephrine and NE for hypotension (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.22, 4.26). For bradycardia, no difference was observed between NE and ephedrine (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.002, 3.33) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.006, 74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phenylephrine, ephedrine, and NE exhibit comparable haemodynamic effects and maternal side effects, although phenylephrine increases the risk of bradycardia. NE improves umbilical artery pH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"526-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_62_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_62_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:子痫前期(PE)患儿脊柱性低血压可导致不良的围产儿结局,因此有效的预防和治疗至关重要。我们的目的是比较苯肾上腺素、麻黄碱和去甲肾上腺素(NE)对PE患者脊柱后低血压的预防和治疗作用。方法:我们对截至2024年6月的各种数据库进行了全面检索,重点是随机临床试验(rct)。连续结局采用标准化平均差异(SMDs),二元结局采用优势比(ORs)。使用R对固定效应和随机效应模型进行分析。结果:9项rct(804例患者)纳入分析。治疗比较显示,NE和麻黄碱(SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.49, 1.53)或苯肾上腺素和麻黄碱(SMD = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.01, 1.82)的平均动脉压无差异。与麻黄碱相比,苯肾上腺素与心动过缓的风险显著增加(OR = 14.34, 95% CI: 1.8, 113.64, P = 0.018),而NE的差异不显著(OR = 2.54, 95% CI: 0.27, 23.94)。与麻黄碱相比,NE显著改善了脐动脉pH (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.62, P = 0.036)。在恶心或呕吐方面没有发现显著差异。预防性比较显示苯肾上腺素和NE治疗低血压无显著差异(OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.22, 4.26)。对于心动过缓,NE和麻黄碱(OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.002, 3.33)或苯肾上腺素和麻黄碱(OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.006, 74)之间没有差异。结论:尽管苯肾上腺素会增加心动过缓的风险,但苯肾上腺素、麻黄碱和NE对血流动力学的影响和母体的副作用相当。NE改善脐动脉pH值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine for the prevention and treatment of spinal-induced hypotension in pre-eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Spinal-induced hypotension in parturients with pre-eclampsia (PE) can lead to adverse perinatal outcomes, making effective prophylaxis and treatment crucial. We aim to compare the prophylactic and therapeutic roles of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine (NE) in treating post-spinal hypotension in PE patients.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of various databases up to June 2024, focusing on randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were used for continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for binary outcomes. Analyses were performed using R with both fixed-effect and random-effects models.

Results: Nine RCTs (804 patients) were included in the analysis. Therapeutic comparisons revealed no differences in mean arterial pressure between NE and ephedrine (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.49, 1.53) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI: -0.01, 1.82). Phenylephrine was associated with a significantly higher risk of bradycardia compared to ephedrine (OR = 14.34, 95% CI: 1.8, 113.64, P = 0.018), whereas NE showed an insignificant difference (OR = 2.54, 95% CI: 0.27, 23.94). NE significantly improved the umbilical artery pH compared to ephedrine (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.62, P = 0.036). No significant differences were identified in nausea or vomiting. Prophylactic comparisons revealed no significant differences between phenylephrine and NE for hypotension (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.22, 4.26). For bradycardia, no difference was observed between NE and ephedrine (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.002, 3.33) or phenylephrine and ephedrine (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.006, 74).

Conclusions: Phenylephrine, ephedrine, and NE exhibit comparable haemodynamic effects and maternal side effects, although phenylephrine increases the risk of bradycardia. NE improves umbilical artery pH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信