人工智能预测股骨干骨折术后30天死亡率:一项回顾性研究

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24
Puneet Gupta, Hong-Jui Shen, Kunj Patel, Rui Guo, Eric R Heinz, Rameshbabu Manyam
{"title":"人工智能预测股骨干骨折术后30天死亡率:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Puneet Gupta, Hong-Jui Shen, Kunj Patel, Rui Guo, Eric R Heinz, Rameshbabu Manyam","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Surgical repair of femoral shaft fractures continues to have notable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models can be utilised to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify patient risk factors for mortality using AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilised data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2015 and 2020. Five AI-driven models were developed and tested using patient clinical information to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery. Additionally, the most important variables for the best-performing model were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1720 patients were identified, and the 30-day mortality rate after femoral shaft fracture surgery was 3.4% (n = 58). XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, a calibration intercept of -0.03, a calibration slope of 1.17, and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important variables for prediction were age, preoperative white blood cell count, creatinine, haematocrit, platelets, blood urea nitrogen, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to internally validate an AI-driven model for predicting mortality within 30 days of surgery in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients, demonstrating good performance. Further research is needed to develop an excellent-performing, AI-driven model that is externally validated prior to clinical translation to support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification and patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 6","pages":"606-614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence for predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Puneet Gupta, Hong-Jui Shen, Kunj Patel, Rui Guo, Eric R Heinz, Rameshbabu Manyam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Surgical repair of femoral shaft fractures continues to have notable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models can be utilised to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify patient risk factors for mortality using AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilised data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2015 and 2020. Five AI-driven models were developed and tested using patient clinical information to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery. Additionally, the most important variables for the best-performing model were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1720 patients were identified, and the 30-day mortality rate after femoral shaft fracture surgery was 3.4% (n = 58). XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, a calibration intercept of -0.03, a calibration slope of 1.17, and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important variables for prediction were age, preoperative white blood cell count, creatinine, haematocrit, platelets, blood urea nitrogen, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to internally validate an AI-driven model for predicting mortality within 30 days of surgery in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients, demonstrating good performance. Further research is needed to develop an excellent-performing, AI-driven model that is externally validated prior to clinical translation to support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification and patient education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"606-614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1060_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:股骨干骨折手术修复术仍有显著的围手术期发病率和死亡率。本研究的目的是评估人工智能(AI)驱动的模型是否可以用于预测股骨干骨折术后30天死亡率,并利用AI识别患者死亡的危险因素。方法:本回顾性研究利用了2015年至2020年国家外科质量改进计划的数据。开发并测试了五个人工智能驱动的模型,利用患者临床信息预测手术后30天内的死亡率。此外,还确定了最佳表现模型的最重要变量。结果:共发现1720例患者,股骨干骨折术后30天死亡率为3.4% (n = 58)。XGBoost的预测效果最好,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.83,校准截距为-0.03,校准斜率为1.17,Brier评分为0.02。预测最重要的变量是年龄、术前白细胞计数、肌酐、红细胞压积、血小板、血尿素氮和体重指数。结论:本研究首次对人工智能驱动的模型进行了内部验证,该模型用于预测股骨骨干骨折患者术后30天内的死亡率,并显示出良好的效果。需要进一步研究开发一种性能优异的人工智能驱动模型,该模型在临床翻译之前经过外部验证,以支持麻醉师和骨科医生进行围手术期风险分层和患者教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence for predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective study.

Background and aims: Surgical repair of femoral shaft fractures continues to have notable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models can be utilised to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify patient risk factors for mortality using AI.

Methods: This retrospective study utilised data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2015 and 2020. Five AI-driven models were developed and tested using patient clinical information to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery. Additionally, the most important variables for the best-performing model were identified.

Results: A total of 1720 patients were identified, and the 30-day mortality rate after femoral shaft fracture surgery was 3.4% (n = 58). XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, a calibration intercept of -0.03, a calibration slope of 1.17, and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important variables for prediction were age, preoperative white blood cell count, creatinine, haematocrit, platelets, blood urea nitrogen, and body mass index.

Conclusion: This study is the first to internally validate an AI-driven model for predicting mortality within 30 days of surgery in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients, demonstrating good performance. Further research is needed to develop an excellent-performing, AI-driven model that is externally validated prior to clinical translation to support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification and patient education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信