转移性肾细胞癌的治疗策略。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Shuchi Gulati, Lorenzo Nardo, Primo N Lara
{"title":"转移性肾细胞癌的治疗策略。","authors":"Shuchi Gulati, Lorenzo Nardo, Primo N Lara","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Currently, the frontline standard of care for patients with mRCC involves the provision of systemic ICI-based combination therapy with no clear guidelines on holding or de-escalating treatment, even with a complete or partial radiological response. Treatments usually continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, frequently leading to overtreatment, which can elevate the risk of toxicity without providing a corresponding increase in therapeutic efficacy. In addition, the ongoing use of expensive antineoplastic drugs increases the financial burden on the already overstretched health care systems and on patients and their families. De-escalation strategies could be designed by integrating contemporary technologies, such as circulating tumor DNA, and advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scans, positron emission tomography CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and machine learning models. Treatment de-escalation, when appropriate, can minimize treatment-related toxicities, reduce health care costs, and optimize the patients' quality of life while maintaining effective cancer control. This paper discusses the advantages, challenges, and clinical implications of de-escalation strategies in the management of mRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we describe the burden of overtreatment in patients who are never able to stop treatments for metastatic kidney cancer. We discuss the application of the latest technology that can help in making de-escalation decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Treatment De-escalation in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Shuchi Gulati, Lorenzo Nardo, Primo N Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Currently, the frontline standard of care for patients with mRCC involves the provision of systemic ICI-based combination therapy with no clear guidelines on holding or de-escalating treatment, even with a complete or partial radiological response. Treatments usually continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, frequently leading to overtreatment, which can elevate the risk of toxicity without providing a corresponding increase in therapeutic efficacy. In addition, the ongoing use of expensive antineoplastic drugs increases the financial burden on the already overstretched health care systems and on patients and their families. De-escalation strategies could be designed by integrating contemporary technologies, such as circulating tumor DNA, and advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scans, positron emission tomography CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and machine learning models. Treatment de-escalation, when appropriate, can minimize treatment-related toxicities, reduce health care costs, and optimize the patients' quality of life while maintaining effective cancer control. This paper discusses the advantages, challenges, and clinical implications of de-escalation strategies in the management of mRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we describe the burden of overtreatment in patients who are never able to stop treatments for metastatic kidney cancer. We discuss the application of the latest technology that can help in making de-escalation decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.05.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和靶向治疗已经彻底改变了转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的管理。目前,mRCC患者的一线护理标准包括提供系统的基于ci的联合治疗,即使有完全或部分放射反应,也没有明确的维持或降级治疗的指南。治疗通常持续到疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性,经常导致过度治疗,这可能会增加毒性的风险,而不会相应提高治疗效果。此外,持续使用昂贵的抗肿瘤药物增加了本已不堪重负的卫生保健系统以及患者及其家属的经济负担。可以通过整合当代技术(如循环肿瘤DNA)和先进的成像技术(如计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描、正电子发射断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像和机器学习模型)来设计降级策略。在适当的情况下,降低治疗升级可以最大限度地减少治疗相关的毒性,降低医疗保健费用,并在保持有效的癌症控制的同时优化患者的生活质量。本文讨论了mRCC管理中降级策略的优势、挑战和临床意义。患者总结:在本报告中,我们描述了转移性肾癌患者无法停止治疗的过度治疗负担。我们讨论了最新技术的应用,可以帮助做出降级决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for Treatment De-escalation in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Currently, the frontline standard of care for patients with mRCC involves the provision of systemic ICI-based combination therapy with no clear guidelines on holding or de-escalating treatment, even with a complete or partial radiological response. Treatments usually continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, frequently leading to overtreatment, which can elevate the risk of toxicity without providing a corresponding increase in therapeutic efficacy. In addition, the ongoing use of expensive antineoplastic drugs increases the financial burden on the already overstretched health care systems and on patients and their families. De-escalation strategies could be designed by integrating contemporary technologies, such as circulating tumor DNA, and advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scans, positron emission tomography CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and machine learning models. Treatment de-escalation, when appropriate, can minimize treatment-related toxicities, reduce health care costs, and optimize the patients' quality of life while maintaining effective cancer control. This paper discusses the advantages, challenges, and clinical implications of de-escalation strategies in the management of mRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we describe the burden of overtreatment in patients who are never able to stop treatments for metastatic kidney cancer. We discuss the application of the latest technology that can help in making de-escalation decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信