不宁腿综合征患者既往多巴胺能治疗相关的亚临床增强:两项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验的事后分析

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CNS drugs Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s40263-025-01192-6
Diego Garcia-Borreguero, David Anguizola, Catalina Carvallo, Alejandro Lopez, Alba Garcia Aragón, Brian Moncada, Sergi Ferré
{"title":"不宁腿综合征患者既往多巴胺能治疗相关的亚临床增强:两项随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验的事后分析","authors":"Diego Garcia-Borreguero, David Anguizola, Catalina Carvallo, Alejandro Lopez, Alba Garcia Aragón, Brian Moncada, Sergi Ferré","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01192-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Augmentation, a long-term complication of dopamine agonist treatment for restless legs syndrome (RLS), is preceded by a gradual loss of response. We investigated whether prior long-term dopaminergic treatment affects current and future responses to dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic drugs, which would suggest broader changes in RLS pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed two previously published, double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled studies with the adenosine transport inhibitor dipyridamole and the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant. Post hoc analyses compared responses between dopaminergic (DA)-naïve and dopaminergic (DA)-treated patients with RLS. None of these patients met the diagnostic criteria for augmentation. After a 2-week washout, patients received active treatment (10-20 mg suvorexant or 200-300 mg dipyridamole) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by crossover. Efficacy was assessed using the International RLS Rating Scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S), multiple suggested immobilization test (m-SIT), periodic leg movements of sleep (PLMS) and other polysomnographic measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients participated in the dipyridamole study (DA-pretreated, n = 10; DA-naïve group, n = 18), and 40 participated in the suvorexant study (DA-pretreated, n = 9; DA-naïve group, n = 31). Compared with DA-naïve patients, DA-pretreated patients responded significantly worse to both treatments on the basis of the IRLS, CGI-S, m-SIT, PLMS indices. There were no differences in sleep parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that previous long-term dopaminergic treatment, even before clinical augmentation is reached, induces pathophysiological changes in RLS that impair future responses to both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic therapies. Our findings confirm previous results with gabapentin enacarbil and suggest that these changes develop well before clinical augmentation appears. Pathophysiological implications for the understanding of dopaminergic augmentation are discussed. Our results support the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recommendation against using dopamine agonists as the initial choice for RLS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"779-793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subclinical Augmentation in Relation to Previous Dopaminergic Treatment in Patients with Restless Legs Syndrome: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Garcia-Borreguero, David Anguizola, Catalina Carvallo, Alejandro Lopez, Alba Garcia Aragón, Brian Moncada, Sergi Ferré\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40263-025-01192-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Augmentation, a long-term complication of dopamine agonist treatment for restless legs syndrome (RLS), is preceded by a gradual loss of response. We investigated whether prior long-term dopaminergic treatment affects current and future responses to dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic drugs, which would suggest broader changes in RLS pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed two previously published, double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled studies with the adenosine transport inhibitor dipyridamole and the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant. Post hoc analyses compared responses between dopaminergic (DA)-naïve and dopaminergic (DA)-treated patients with RLS. None of these patients met the diagnostic criteria for augmentation. After a 2-week washout, patients received active treatment (10-20 mg suvorexant or 200-300 mg dipyridamole) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by crossover. Efficacy was assessed using the International RLS Rating Scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S), multiple suggested immobilization test (m-SIT), periodic leg movements of sleep (PLMS) and other polysomnographic measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients participated in the dipyridamole study (DA-pretreated, n = 10; DA-naïve group, n = 18), and 40 participated in the suvorexant study (DA-pretreated, n = 9; DA-naïve group, n = 31). Compared with DA-naïve patients, DA-pretreated patients responded significantly worse to both treatments on the basis of the IRLS, CGI-S, m-SIT, PLMS indices. There were no differences in sleep parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that previous long-term dopaminergic treatment, even before clinical augmentation is reached, induces pathophysiological changes in RLS that impair future responses to both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic therapies. Our findings confirm previous results with gabapentin enacarbil and suggest that these changes develop well before clinical augmentation appears. Pathophysiological implications for the understanding of dopaminergic augmentation are discussed. Our results support the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recommendation against using dopamine agonists as the initial choice for RLS treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"779-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01192-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01192-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:增强,多巴胺激动剂治疗不宁腿综合征(RLS)的一个长期并发症,是在反应逐渐丧失之前。我们研究了之前的长期多巴胺能治疗是否会影响当前和未来对多巴胺能和非多巴胺能药物的反应,这可能表明RLS病理生理发生了更广泛的变化。方法:我们回顾性分析了先前发表的两项双盲、随机、交叉、安慰剂对照的研究,其中腺苷转运抑制剂双嘧达莫和食欲素受体拮抗剂suvorexant。事后分析比较了多巴胺能(DA)-naïve和多巴胺能(DA)治疗的RLS患者的反应。这些患者都不符合增强的诊断标准。洗脱期2周后,患者接受积极治疗(10- 20mg suvorexant或200- 300mg双嘧达莫)或安慰剂治疗2周,随后进行交叉治疗。疗效评估采用国际RLS评定量表(IRLS)、临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)、多重建议固定试验(m-SIT)、周期性睡眠腿部运动(PLMS)和其他多导睡眠图测量。结果:共有28例患者参与了双嘧达莫研究(da预处理,n = 10;DA-naïve组,n = 18), 40人参加了过度研究(da预处理,n = 9;DA-naïve组,n = 31)。与DA-naïve患者相比,经da预处理的患者在IRLS、CGI-S、m-SIT、PLMS指标上对两种治疗的反应均明显差。睡眠参数没有差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,之前的长期多巴胺能治疗,甚至在达到临床增强效果之前,会引起RLS的病理生理变化,损害未来对多巴胺能和非多巴胺能治疗的反应。我们的研究结果证实了先前加巴喷丁那沙比尔的结果,并表明这些变化在临床增强出现之前就已经发生了。病理生理学意义的理解多巴胺能增强进行了讨论。我们的研究结果支持了美国睡眠医学学会(AASM)反对将多巴胺激动剂作为RLS治疗的首选的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subclinical Augmentation in Relation to Previous Dopaminergic Treatment in Patients with Restless Legs Syndrome: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trials.

Background and objectives: Augmentation, a long-term complication of dopamine agonist treatment for restless legs syndrome (RLS), is preceded by a gradual loss of response. We investigated whether prior long-term dopaminergic treatment affects current and future responses to dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic drugs, which would suggest broader changes in RLS pathophysiology.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed two previously published, double-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled studies with the adenosine transport inhibitor dipyridamole and the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant. Post hoc analyses compared responses between dopaminergic (DA)-naïve and dopaminergic (DA)-treated patients with RLS. None of these patients met the diagnostic criteria for augmentation. After a 2-week washout, patients received active treatment (10-20 mg suvorexant or 200-300 mg dipyridamole) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by crossover. Efficacy was assessed using the International RLS Rating Scale (IRLS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S), multiple suggested immobilization test (m-SIT), periodic leg movements of sleep (PLMS) and other polysomnographic measures.

Results: A total of 28 patients participated in the dipyridamole study (DA-pretreated, n = 10; DA-naïve group, n = 18), and 40 participated in the suvorexant study (DA-pretreated, n = 9; DA-naïve group, n = 31). Compared with DA-naïve patients, DA-pretreated patients responded significantly worse to both treatments on the basis of the IRLS, CGI-S, m-SIT, PLMS indices. There were no differences in sleep parameters.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that previous long-term dopaminergic treatment, even before clinical augmentation is reached, induces pathophysiological changes in RLS that impair future responses to both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic therapies. Our findings confirm previous results with gabapentin enacarbil and suggest that these changes develop well before clinical augmentation appears. Pathophysiological implications for the understanding of dopaminergic augmentation are discussed. Our results support the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recommendation against using dopamine agonists as the initial choice for RLS treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信