近距离扩展法炎症谱分析不能区分长期1型糖尿病患者中残留c肽的存在。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ebrahim Anvari, Per Lundkvist, Kailash Singh, Daniel Espes
{"title":"近距离扩展法炎症谱分析不能区分长期1型糖尿病患者中残留c肽的存在。","authors":"Ebrahim Anvari, Per Lundkvist, Kailash Singh, Daniel Espes","doi":"10.1007/s00592-025-02537-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) have remaining low levels of C-peptide, i.e. and indirect sign of remaining functional beta-cells. This study focused on identifying differences in immunological and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adult patients (n = 120) with long-standing T1D (≥ 10 years) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 50) were recruited at Uppsala University Hospital. Residual beta-cell function was determined with an ultrasensitive C-peptide ELISA under fasting conditions. T1D patients were divided into two groups (C-peptide positive vs. C-peptide negative). Using the OLINK Explore Inflammation proximity extension assay (PEA), 368 circulating immunological and inflammatory biomarkers were analyzed in plasma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three groups could not be distinguished by principal component analysis and when correcting for multiple testing we found no differences in circulating biomarkers. However, based on uncorrected p-values there were six biomarkers that were different when comparing all T1D patients with HC and eight markers that were different when comparing C-peptide positive vs. negative T1D patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A wide inflammatory assay analysis cannot distinguish patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide from patients with a complete loss of C-peptide nor from HC.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proximity extension assay inflammatory profiling cannot distinguish the presence of residual C-peptide in patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Ebrahim Anvari, Per Lundkvist, Kailash Singh, Daniel Espes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-025-02537-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) have remaining low levels of C-peptide, i.e. and indirect sign of remaining functional beta-cells. This study focused on identifying differences in immunological and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Adult patients (n = 120) with long-standing T1D (≥ 10 years) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 50) were recruited at Uppsala University Hospital. Residual beta-cell function was determined with an ultrasensitive C-peptide ELISA under fasting conditions. T1D patients were divided into two groups (C-peptide positive vs. C-peptide negative). Using the OLINK Explore Inflammation proximity extension assay (PEA), 368 circulating immunological and inflammatory biomarkers were analyzed in plasma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three groups could not be distinguished by principal component analysis and when correcting for multiple testing we found no differences in circulating biomarkers. However, based on uncorrected p-values there were six biomarkers that were different when comparing all T1D patients with HC and eight markers that were different when comparing C-peptide positive vs. negative T1D patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A wide inflammatory assay analysis cannot distinguish patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide from patients with a complete loss of C-peptide nor from HC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02537-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02537-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多长期患有1型糖尿病(T1D)的患者c肽水平仍然很低,即存在剩余功能性β细胞的间接迹象。本研究的重点是确定长期T1D患者和剩余c肽的免疫和炎症生物标志物的差异。研究设计和方法:在乌普萨拉大学医院招募长期T1D(≥10年)的成年患者(n = 120)和健康对照(HC) (n = 50)。在禁食条件下,用超灵敏c肽ELISA法测定剩余β细胞功能。T1D患者分为c肽阳性组和c肽阴性组。使用OLINK Explore Inflammation proximity extension assay (PEA),研究人员分析了血浆中368种循环免疫和炎症生物标志物。结果:三组不能通过主成分分析区分,当校正多重测试时,我们发现循环生物标志物没有差异。然而,根据未校正的p值,在比较所有T1D患者与HC时,有6个生物标志物存在差异,在比较c肽阳性与阴性T1D患者时,有8个生物标志物存在差异。结论:广泛的炎症分析不能区分长期T1D和剩余c肽患者与c肽完全丢失患者或HC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proximity extension assay inflammatory profiling cannot distinguish the presence of residual C-peptide in patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes.

Objective: Many patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) have remaining low levels of C-peptide, i.e. and indirect sign of remaining functional beta-cells. This study focused on identifying differences in immunological and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide.

Research design and methods: Adult patients (n = 120) with long-standing T1D (≥ 10 years) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 50) were recruited at Uppsala University Hospital. Residual beta-cell function was determined with an ultrasensitive C-peptide ELISA under fasting conditions. T1D patients were divided into two groups (C-peptide positive vs. C-peptide negative). Using the OLINK Explore Inflammation proximity extension assay (PEA), 368 circulating immunological and inflammatory biomarkers were analyzed in plasma.

Results: The three groups could not be distinguished by principal component analysis and when correcting for multiple testing we found no differences in circulating biomarkers. However, based on uncorrected p-values there were six biomarkers that were different when comparing all T1D patients with HC and eight markers that were different when comparing C-peptide positive vs. negative T1D patients.

Conclusion: A wide inflammatory assay analysis cannot distinguish patients with longstanding T1D and remaining C-peptide from patients with a complete loss of C-peptide nor from HC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信