超越GLP-1:双重和三重肠促胰岛素激动剂在个性化2型糖尿病护理中的有效性和安全性-系统评价和网络荟萃分析

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kangling Yan, Haichuan Yu, Benoît Blaise
{"title":"超越GLP-1:双重和三重肠促胰岛素激动剂在个性化2型糖尿病护理中的有效性和安全性-系统评价和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Kangling Yan, Haichuan Yu, Benoît Blaise","doi":"10.1007/s00592-025-02534-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual and triple incretin-based agonists, targeting combinations of GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, represent an innovative approach in T2DM care. However, comparative efficacy and safety analyses tailored to receptor-specific strategies are limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis uniquely evaluates the efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists compared to standard therapies, offering insights into personalized, receptor-specific T2DM therapies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to July 2024) identified RCTs.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Trials assessing dual or triple incretin therapies in T2DM with outcomes on weight, HbA1c, FBG, AEs, and SAEs were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data on efficacy and safety were extracted by independent reviewers and assessed for quality using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Retatrutide achieved the greatest weight reduction (MD: - 8.601; 95% CrI: - 11.20 to - 5.95) while Tirzepatide was most effective in lowering FBG (MD: - 57.30) and HbA1c ( - 1.88), with 95% CrIs of - 65.41 to - 48.9 and - 2.15 to - 1.64 respectively. Tirzepatide (RR 1.15) and Cotadutide (1.38) increased AEs, while Semaglutide reduced SAEs (0.35); 95% Crls: 1.04-1.33, 1.16-1.68, and 0.13-0.78, respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample sizes, short study durations, and reliance on indirect comparisons in some cases may limit the certainty of these findings. Direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receptor-specific targeting optimizes T2DM treatment, with Semaglutide supporting glycemic control, Tirzepatide enhancing weight loss and glucose regulation, and Retatrutide potentially offering broader metabolic benefits, advancing receptor-targeted, personalized therapy.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024532368.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond GLP-1: efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists in personalized type 2 diabetes care-a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kangling Yan, Haichuan Yu, Benoît Blaise\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-025-02534-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual and triple incretin-based agonists, targeting combinations of GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, represent an innovative approach in T2DM care. However, comparative efficacy and safety analyses tailored to receptor-specific strategies are limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis uniquely evaluates the efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists compared to standard therapies, offering insights into personalized, receptor-specific T2DM therapies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to July 2024) identified RCTs.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Trials assessing dual or triple incretin therapies in T2DM with outcomes on weight, HbA1c, FBG, AEs, and SAEs were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data on efficacy and safety were extracted by independent reviewers and assessed for quality using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Retatrutide achieved the greatest weight reduction (MD: - 8.601; 95% CrI: - 11.20 to - 5.95) while Tirzepatide was most effective in lowering FBG (MD: - 57.30) and HbA1c ( - 1.88), with 95% CrIs of - 65.41 to - 48.9 and - 2.15 to - 1.64 respectively. Tirzepatide (RR 1.15) and Cotadutide (1.38) increased AEs, while Semaglutide reduced SAEs (0.35); 95% Crls: 1.04-1.33, 1.16-1.68, and 0.13-0.78, respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample sizes, short study durations, and reliance on indirect comparisons in some cases may limit the certainty of these findings. Direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receptor-specific targeting optimizes T2DM treatment, with Semaglutide supporting glycemic control, Tirzepatide enhancing weight loss and glucose regulation, and Retatrutide potentially offering broader metabolic benefits, advancing receptor-targeted, personalized therapy.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024532368.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02534-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02534-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双重和三重基于胰促胰岛素的激动剂,靶向GLP-1, GIP和胰高血糖素受体的组合,代表了T2DM治疗的一种创新方法。然而,针对受体特异性策略的比较疗效和安全性分析是有限的。目的:本系统综述和网络荟萃分析独特地评估了与标准治疗相比,双重和三重肠促胰岛素激动剂的疗效和安全性,为个性化、受体特异性的T2DM治疗提供了见解。数据来源:系统检索PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library和Embase(截至2024年7月)确定的rct。研究选择:评估T2DM双或三联肠促胰岛素治疗与体重、HbA1c、FBG、ae和sae结果的试验包括在内。数据提取:疗效和安全性数据由独立审稿人提取,并使用NIH质量评估工具进行质量评估。数据综合:利特鲁肽减重效果最大(MD: - 8.601;95% CrI: - 11.20 ~ - 5.95),而替西帕肽在降低FBG (MD: - 57.30)和HbA1c(- 1.88)方面最有效,95% CrI分别为- 65.41 ~ - 48.9和- 2.15 ~ - 1.64。替西帕肽(RR = 1.15)和科多肽(RR = 1.38)增加ae,而西马鲁肽降低sae (RR = 0.35);95% Crls分别为1.04 ~ 1.33、1.16 ~ 1.68、0.13 ~ 0.78。局限性:样本量小,研究持续时间短,在某些情况下依赖于间接比较可能会限制这些发现的确定性。需要直接的面对面试验来证实这些结果。结论:受体特异性靶向优化了T2DM治疗,西马鲁肽支持血糖控制,替西帕肽促进体重减轻和血糖调节,利特鲁肽可能提供更广泛的代谢益处,推进受体靶向的个性化治疗。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024532368。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond GLP-1: efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists in personalized type 2 diabetes care-a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Dual and triple incretin-based agonists, targeting combinations of GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, represent an innovative approach in T2DM care. However, comparative efficacy and safety analyses tailored to receptor-specific strategies are limited.

Purpose: This systematic review and network meta-analysis uniquely evaluates the efficacy and safety of dual and triple incretin agonists compared to standard therapies, offering insights into personalized, receptor-specific T2DM therapies.

Data sources: Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to July 2024) identified RCTs.

Study selection: Trials assessing dual or triple incretin therapies in T2DM with outcomes on weight, HbA1c, FBG, AEs, and SAEs were included.

Data extraction: Data on efficacy and safety were extracted by independent reviewers and assessed for quality using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.

Data synthesis: Retatrutide achieved the greatest weight reduction (MD: - 8.601; 95% CrI: - 11.20 to - 5.95) while Tirzepatide was most effective in lowering FBG (MD: - 57.30) and HbA1c ( - 1.88), with 95% CrIs of - 65.41 to - 48.9 and - 2.15 to - 1.64 respectively. Tirzepatide (RR 1.15) and Cotadutide (1.38) increased AEs, while Semaglutide reduced SAEs (0.35); 95% Crls: 1.04-1.33, 1.16-1.68, and 0.13-0.78, respectively.

Limitations: Small sample sizes, short study durations, and reliance on indirect comparisons in some cases may limit the certainty of these findings. Direct head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these results.

Conclusion: Receptor-specific targeting optimizes T2DM treatment, with Semaglutide supporting glycemic control, Tirzepatide enhancing weight loss and glucose regulation, and Retatrutide potentially offering broader metabolic benefits, advancing receptor-targeted, personalized therapy.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024532368.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信