美国药物基因组学实施的进展:障碍侵蚀和剩余挑战。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
D Max Smith, Michael P Douglas, Christina L Aquilante, Patricia A Deverka, Beth Devine, Henry M Dunnenberger, Philip E Empey, Daniel L Hertz, Andrew A Monte, Ann M Moyer, Jai N Patel, Victoria M Pratt, Loren Saulsberry, Stuart A Scott, Deepak Voora, Erica L Woodahl, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Akinyemi Oni-Orisan
{"title":"美国药物基因组学实施的进展:障碍侵蚀和剩余挑战。","authors":"D Max Smith, Michael P Douglas, Christina L Aquilante, Patricia A Deverka, Beth Devine, Henry M Dunnenberger, Philip E Empey, Daniel L Hertz, Andrew A Monte, Ann M Moyer, Jai N Patel, Victoria M Pratt, Loren Saulsberry, Stuart A Scott, Deepak Voora, Erica L Woodahl, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Akinyemi Oni-Orisan","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic-specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"D Max Smith, Michael P Douglas, Christina L Aquilante, Patricia A Deverka, Beth Devine, Henry M Dunnenberger, Philip E Empey, Daniel L Hertz, Andrew A Monte, Ann M Moyer, Jai N Patel, Victoria M Pratt, Loren Saulsberry, Stuart A Scott, Deepak Voora, Erica L Woodahl, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo, Akinyemi Oni-Orisan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic-specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3736\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将药物遗传学纳入美国常规临床实践的障碍是有据可查的。临床药物遗传学实施联盟(CPIC)在2009年和2010年进行的初步调查确定了四个关键领域的障碍,这些障碍阻碍了临床药物遗传学检测的广泛采用。这些被逐字呈现为:(i)缺乏解释基因型信息和将遗传信息转化为临床行动所需过程的定义;(ii)目前需要临床实施推荐的药物/基因对;(iii)临床医生在床边考虑药物遗传信息的耐药性;(iv)对测试成本和报销的担忧。随着时间的推移,许多这些挑战已经克服,临床药物遗传学检测随后得到了更广泛的实施。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍存在一些阻碍进一步采用的障碍。这篇叙述性综述利用作者的专业知识和经验来识别和描述目前在美国七个领域实施药物遗传学的障碍:公平和包容;指南和支持证据;监管机构监督;付款人覆盖范围和保险;提供高质量的药物遗传学检测;电子健康记录;提供者和病人的教育。在每个领域中,它回顾了过去的成功和挑战,并探索了仍然存在的障碍。我们还提出了解决这些领域持续挑战的解决方案,包括进一步扩展药物遗传学特定指南之外的建议,设计临床决策支持工具的标准,以及更广泛的药物遗传学教育。解决这些剩余的障碍指导工作,使更广泛地采用临床药物遗传学实施,最终改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges.

Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic-specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信