{"title":"多方参与的社会和健康促进干预对在丹麦重新定居的叙利亚难民家庭健康和福祉的影响","authors":"Nina Odgaard Nielsen , Anne Vollen Rafn , Signe Andersen , Jan Rafn , Hanne Kjærsgaard , Birthe Petersen , Anne Juul Sønderskov , Morten Dahl , Eirikur Benedikz , Marianne Lindahl","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim was to evaluate the effect of a multi-component social and health promoting intervention on health and wellbeing in a well-defined group of refugee families 2–4 years after resettlement in Denmark.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This longitudinal open-label comparison study involved 82 individuals from Syria aged 13–53 years comprising an intervention group (IG, <em>n</em> = 50) and a comparison group (CG, <em>n</em> = 32), was conducted from 2019 to 2021. The main outcomes were self-rated health, assessed using a single item question from the Danish National Health Surveys, and mental wellbeing measured by the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Objective levels of cholesterol, blood glucose (HbA1c), and blood pressure were also determined. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the effect of the intervention on SWEMWBS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A higher proportion in the IG (38 %) than in the CG (22 %) had rated their general health more positively after the intervention, though the difference was statistically insignificant (<em>p</em> = 0.38). There was a less decrease in SWEMWBS scores in the IG (slope 0.47) than in the CG (slope 0.27) from 2019 to 2020, indicating a positive, but insignificant, effect of the intervention (estimate: 0.20, 95 % CI:0.06 – 0.47, <em>p</em> = 0.13). This tendency of a positive effect was absent in 2021. High participation rate was significantly associated with higher post-intervention SWEMWBS scores (coefficient: 3.45, 95 % CI: 1.86 – 5.03, <em>p</em> < 0.01). No effects on objectively measured biomarkers were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study demonstrated changes in self-rated health and SWEMWBS scores in the IG and CG, and indicated an overall tendency of a positive effect of the intervention on general health and mental wellbeing among the study participants. The effects might have been more pronounced without the convergence of counteracting factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and substantial fear arising from the European repatriation policies debated in 2021.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a multi-component, participatory social and health promoting intervention on health and wellbeing in refugee families from Syria resettled in Denmark\",\"authors\":\"Nina Odgaard Nielsen , Anne Vollen Rafn , Signe Andersen , Jan Rafn , Hanne Kjærsgaard , Birthe Petersen , Anne Juul Sønderskov , Morten Dahl , Eirikur Benedikz , Marianne Lindahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim was to evaluate the effect of a multi-component social and health promoting intervention on health and wellbeing in a well-defined group of refugee families 2–4 years after resettlement in Denmark.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This longitudinal open-label comparison study involved 82 individuals from Syria aged 13–53 years comprising an intervention group (IG, <em>n</em> = 50) and a comparison group (CG, <em>n</em> = 32), was conducted from 2019 to 2021. The main outcomes were self-rated health, assessed using a single item question from the Danish National Health Surveys, and mental wellbeing measured by the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Objective levels of cholesterol, blood glucose (HbA1c), and blood pressure were also determined. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the effect of the intervention on SWEMWBS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A higher proportion in the IG (38 %) than in the CG (22 %) had rated their general health more positively after the intervention, though the difference was statistically insignificant (<em>p</em> = 0.38). There was a less decrease in SWEMWBS scores in the IG (slope 0.47) than in the CG (slope 0.27) from 2019 to 2020, indicating a positive, but insignificant, effect of the intervention (estimate: 0.20, 95 % CI:0.06 – 0.47, <em>p</em> = 0.13). This tendency of a positive effect was absent in 2021. High participation rate was significantly associated with higher post-intervention SWEMWBS scores (coefficient: 3.45, 95 % CI: 1.86 – 5.03, <em>p</em> < 0.01). No effects on objectively measured biomarkers were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study demonstrated changes in self-rated health and SWEMWBS scores in the IG and CG, and indicated an overall tendency of a positive effect of the intervention on general health and mental wellbeing among the study participants. The effects might have been more pronounced without the convergence of counteracting factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and substantial fear arising from the European repatriation policies debated in 2021.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Migration and Health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Migration and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623525000376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623525000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目的是评估在丹麦重新定居2-4年后,一项多成分社会和健康促进干预措施对明确界定的难民家庭群体的健康和福祉的影响。方法本纵向开放标签比较研究于2019年至2021年进行,涉及82名13-53岁的叙利亚人,包括干预组(IG, n = 50)和对照组(CG, n = 32)。主要结果是自我评估健康,使用丹麦国家健康调查中的单项问题进行评估,并通过短沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)测量心理健康。同时测定胆固醇、血糖(HbA1c)和血压的客观水平。采用多元线性回归模型估计干预对SWEMWBS评分的影响。结果IG组(38%)比CG组(22%)在干预后对自身总体健康状况评价较高,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.38)。从2019年到2020年,IG组的SWEMWBS评分下降幅度(斜率为0.47)小于CG组(斜率为0.27),表明干预的影响是积极的,但不显著(估计:0.20,95% CI:0.06 - 0.47, p = 0.13)。这种积极影响的趋势在2021年没有出现。高参与率与干预后较高的SWEMWBS评分显著相关(系数:3.45,95% CI: 1.86 - 5.03, p <;0.01)。未观察到对客观测量的生物标志物的影响。结论本研究证实了IG和CG自评健康和SWEMWBS评分的变化,表明干预对研究参与者的一般健康和心理健康有积极影响的总体趋势。如果没有COVID-19大流行等抵消因素的趋同,以及2021年辩论的欧洲遣返政策引发的巨大恐惧,这种影响可能会更加明显。
Effect of a multi-component, participatory social and health promoting intervention on health and wellbeing in refugee families from Syria resettled in Denmark
Aim
The aim was to evaluate the effect of a multi-component social and health promoting intervention on health and wellbeing in a well-defined group of refugee families 2–4 years after resettlement in Denmark.
Methods
This longitudinal open-label comparison study involved 82 individuals from Syria aged 13–53 years comprising an intervention group (IG, n = 50) and a comparison group (CG, n = 32), was conducted from 2019 to 2021. The main outcomes were self-rated health, assessed using a single item question from the Danish National Health Surveys, and mental wellbeing measured by the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS). Objective levels of cholesterol, blood glucose (HbA1c), and blood pressure were also determined. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the effect of the intervention on SWEMWBS scores.
Results
A higher proportion in the IG (38 %) than in the CG (22 %) had rated their general health more positively after the intervention, though the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.38). There was a less decrease in SWEMWBS scores in the IG (slope 0.47) than in the CG (slope 0.27) from 2019 to 2020, indicating a positive, but insignificant, effect of the intervention (estimate: 0.20, 95 % CI:0.06 – 0.47, p = 0.13). This tendency of a positive effect was absent in 2021. High participation rate was significantly associated with higher post-intervention SWEMWBS scores (coefficient: 3.45, 95 % CI: 1.86 – 5.03, p < 0.01). No effects on objectively measured biomarkers were observed.
Conclusions
The study demonstrated changes in self-rated health and SWEMWBS scores in the IG and CG, and indicated an overall tendency of a positive effect of the intervention on general health and mental wellbeing among the study participants. The effects might have been more pronounced without the convergence of counteracting factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and substantial fear arising from the European repatriation policies debated in 2021.