计算机断层扫描定位胃肠道穿孔的诊断准确性:以胃和十二指肠缺损为重点

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Aleksandar Pavlovic , Tyler Herrington , Ksenija Mijovic , Richard M. Gore , Dragan Vasin , Francesco Alessandrino , Aleksandar M. Ivanovic
{"title":"计算机断层扫描定位胃肠道穿孔的诊断准确性:以胃和十二指肠缺损为重点","authors":"Aleksandar Pavlovic ,&nbsp;Tyler Herrington ,&nbsp;Ksenija Mijovic ,&nbsp;Richard M. Gore ,&nbsp;Dragan Vasin ,&nbsp;Francesco Alessandrino ,&nbsp;Aleksandar M. Ivanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in localizing gastrointestinal perforations: Focusing on gastric and duodenal defects\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Pavlovic ,&nbsp;Tyler Herrington ,&nbsp;Ksenija Mijovic ,&nbsp;Richard M. Gore ,&nbsp;Dragan Vasin ,&nbsp;Francesco Alessandrino ,&nbsp;Aleksandar M. Ivanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的详细评估计算机断层扫描(CT)定位胃肠道穿孔的准确性和再现性,重点是区分胃和十二指肠的缺陷。方法本研究为单中心回顾性研究,评估术前行增强腹部骨盆CT检查的经手术证实的胃肠道穿孔患者。两名专科放射科医生独立检查每台CT,以确定穿孔部位,区分胃十二指肠和其他部位的穿孔,并通过明确的CT征象(如气体包涵体、气腹和胃肠道壁增厚)来区分胃和十二指肠穿孔。对于胃十二指肠穿孔,最小强度投影(MinIP)重建的准确性也进行了评估。使用Cohen的kappa统计来计算读者间协议。结果156例患者(男/女:89/67;中位年龄:62岁)符合纳入标准。评价者1和评价者2区分所有穿孔部位的CT准确率分别为73.1%和67.9% (k = 0.72)。鉴别胃十二指肠与其他穿孔时,准确率分别提高到94.9%和88.5% (k = 0.86)。胃十二指肠穿孔(n = 56;35.9%),文献1正确区分胃穿孔和十二指肠穿孔的比例为79.6%,文献2正确区分胃穿孔和十二指肠穿孔的比例为64.8%。MinIP成像将准确率提高到87%和77.8%,尽管没有显著性差异(p = 0.47和p = 0.21)。结论ct在定位胃肠道穿孔方面具有较高的准确性和重复性,特别是在区分胃和十二指肠缺陷方面,这是手术决策的关键区别。在这种情况下,MinIP重建可能作为一种新的诊断辅助手段有用。CT征象如液体、脂肪滞留和壁增厚在大多数穿孔中可见,但没有一个与正确的穿孔定位显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in localizing gastrointestinal perforations: Focusing on gastric and duodenal defects

Purpose

To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.

Results

156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).

Conclusion

CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信