Aleksandar Pavlovic , Tyler Herrington , Ksenija Mijovic , Richard M. Gore , Dragan Vasin , Francesco Alessandrino , Aleksandar M. Ivanovic
{"title":"计算机断层扫描定位胃肠道穿孔的诊断准确性:以胃和十二指肠缺损为重点","authors":"Aleksandar Pavlovic , Tyler Herrington , Ksenija Mijovic , Richard M. Gore , Dragan Vasin , Francesco Alessandrino , Aleksandar M. Ivanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in localizing gastrointestinal perforations: Focusing on gastric and duodenal defects\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Pavlovic , Tyler Herrington , Ksenija Mijovic , Richard M. Gore , Dragan Vasin , Francesco Alessandrino , Aleksandar M. Ivanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in localizing gastrointestinal perforations: Focusing on gastric and duodenal defects
Purpose
To provide a detailed assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of Computed Tomography (CT) in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, with a focus on distinguishing gastric and duodenal defects.
Methods
This single-center retrospective study evaluated subjects with surgically confirmed gastrointestinal perforation who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Two subspecialized radiologists reviewed each CT independently to identify the perforation site, to differentiate gastroduodenal from perforations in other locations, and to differentiate between gastric and duodenal perforation, using defined CT signs such as gas inclusions, pneumoperitoneum, and thickened gastrointestinal walls. For gastroduodenal perforations, accuracy of Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) reconstructions was also assessed. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics.
Results
156 patients (M/F: 89/67; median age: 62 years) met inclusion criteria. CT accuracy in distinguishing all perforation sites was 73.1 % for Reviewer 1 and 67.9 % for Reviewer 2 (k = 0.72). When differentiating gastroduodenal from other perforations, accuracy increased to 94.9 % and 88.5 % (k = 0.86). Among gastroduodenal perforations (n = 56; 35.9 %), Reviewer 1 correctly differentiated gastric from duodenal perforation in 79.6 % of cases, and Reviewer 2 in 64.8 %. MinIP imaging increased accuracy to 87 % and 77.8 %, though not significantly (p = 0.47 and p = 0.21).
Conclusion
CT demonstrates high accuracy and reproducibility in localizing gastrointestinal perforations, particularly in differentiating gastric from duodenal defects– a critical distinction for surgical decision making. MinIP reconstructions may be useful as a novel diagnostic adjunct in this context. CT signs such as fluid, fat stranding, and wall thickening were seen in most perforations, though none correlated significantly with correct perforation localization.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.