局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗选择的关键临床考虑因素

S. Parikh , P. Correa , R. Sinha
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗选择的关键临床考虑因素","authors":"S. Parikh ,&nbsp;P. Correa ,&nbsp;R. Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.rcro.2025.100348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is gaining favour as the preferred treatment approach for all locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The evidence landscape for TNT is supported by multiple trials that show a reduction in distant metastases and more recently an overall survival benefit. However, LARC as a term includes a heterogenous patient population. There are also several different schedules of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that fall under the umbrella term of TNT. The role of watch and wait strategies after TNT is an evolving option that can improve long term functional outcomes for a subgroup of patients. These developments together have resulted in a complex clinical and evidence landscape with different endpoints that need attention when selecting a neoadjuvant treatment strategy.</div><div>Three broad considerations are discussed in this commentary. Firstly, tumour characteristics and MRI-based risk stratification relevant to a summary of oncological outcomes, including impact on rates of local control, development of distant metastases, survival and relevant functional outcomes after TNT is presented. Secondly, the value placed by the patient on non-operative management. The evidence supporting watch and wait after TNT and the limitations of such an approach is summarised with helpful infographics to support shared decision making in clinic. Finally, patient specific factors such as comorbidity are detailed.</div><div>This commentary aims to serve as a nuanced map that describes how the current landscape of TNT strategies can be applied to an individual patient. In conclusion, the anticipated near-future developments in TNT are also highlighted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101248,"journal":{"name":"The Royal College of Radiologists Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key clinical considerations in selecting total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"S. Parikh ,&nbsp;P. Correa ,&nbsp;R. Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcro.2025.100348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is gaining favour as the preferred treatment approach for all locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The evidence landscape for TNT is supported by multiple trials that show a reduction in distant metastases and more recently an overall survival benefit. However, LARC as a term includes a heterogenous patient population. There are also several different schedules of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that fall under the umbrella term of TNT. The role of watch and wait strategies after TNT is an evolving option that can improve long term functional outcomes for a subgroup of patients. These developments together have resulted in a complex clinical and evidence landscape with different endpoints that need attention when selecting a neoadjuvant treatment strategy.</div><div>Three broad considerations are discussed in this commentary. Firstly, tumour characteristics and MRI-based risk stratification relevant to a summary of oncological outcomes, including impact on rates of local control, development of distant metastases, survival and relevant functional outcomes after TNT is presented. Secondly, the value placed by the patient on non-operative management. The evidence supporting watch and wait after TNT and the limitations of such an approach is summarised with helpful infographics to support shared decision making in clinic. Finally, patient specific factors such as comorbidity are detailed.</div><div>This commentary aims to serve as a nuanced map that describes how the current landscape of TNT strategies can be applied to an individual patient. In conclusion, the anticipated near-future developments in TNT are also highlighted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Royal College of Radiologists Open\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Royal College of Radiologists Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773066225001147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Royal College of Radiologists Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773066225001147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全新辅助治疗(TNT)作为所有局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的首选治疗方法越来越受到青睐。TNT的证据景观得到了多个试验的支持,这些试验显示远处转移的减少和最近的总体生存益处。然而,LARC作为一个术语包括一个异质性的患者群体。还有几种不同的放疗和化疗方案都属于TNT的总称。TNT后观察和等待策略的作用是一种不断发展的选择,可以改善亚组患者的长期功能结局。在选择新辅助治疗策略时,这些发展共同导致了复杂的临床和证据环境,需要注意不同的终点。本评注讨论了三个广泛的考虑。首先,介绍了肿瘤特征和基于mri的风险分层,这些风险分层与肿瘤预后总结相关,包括对TNT后局部控制率、远处转移的发展、生存和相关功能预后的影响。其次,患者对非手术治疗的重视程度。支持TNT后观察和等待的证据以及这种方法的局限性总结了有用的信息图表,以支持临床共同决策。最后,详细介绍了患者的具体因素,如合并症。这篇评论的目的是作为一幅细致的地图,描述TNT战略的当前景观如何应用于个体患者。最后,还强调了TNT近期预期的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key clinical considerations in selecting total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is gaining favour as the preferred treatment approach for all locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The evidence landscape for TNT is supported by multiple trials that show a reduction in distant metastases and more recently an overall survival benefit. However, LARC as a term includes a heterogenous patient population. There are also several different schedules of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that fall under the umbrella term of TNT. The role of watch and wait strategies after TNT is an evolving option that can improve long term functional outcomes for a subgroup of patients. These developments together have resulted in a complex clinical and evidence landscape with different endpoints that need attention when selecting a neoadjuvant treatment strategy.
Three broad considerations are discussed in this commentary. Firstly, tumour characteristics and MRI-based risk stratification relevant to a summary of oncological outcomes, including impact on rates of local control, development of distant metastases, survival and relevant functional outcomes after TNT is presented. Secondly, the value placed by the patient on non-operative management. The evidence supporting watch and wait after TNT and the limitations of such an approach is summarised with helpful infographics to support shared decision making in clinic. Finally, patient specific factors such as comorbidity are detailed.
This commentary aims to serve as a nuanced map that describes how the current landscape of TNT strategies can be applied to an individual patient. In conclusion, the anticipated near-future developments in TNT are also highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信