Elizabeth Nethery, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Julie Lee, Patricia A. Janssen, Laura Schummers
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病筛查政策在全省范围内改变对治疗和新生儿体重的影响","authors":"Elizabeth Nethery, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Julie Lee, Patricia A. Janssen, Laura Schummers","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment and newborn birth weight after a 2010 change in GDM screening recommendations from a two-step (50-g glucose challenge test + 3-h, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] with Carpenter-Coustan criteria) to a mix of one-step and two-step (2-h, 75-g OGTT with International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group criteria). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We estimated effects of the screening change on the incidence of lifestyle or medication treatment, infant birth weight >90th percentile or <10th percentile for gestational age (large and small for gestational age), and endocrinologist visits using interrupted time series analysis in all 463,881 individuals with singleton pregnancies (>28 gestational weeks) from British Columbia, Canada, between 2004 and 2019. RESULTS After the screening change, lifestyle-treated GDM increased immediately (level change 1.85 [95% CI 1.19–2.51]), corresponding to a 1.85% increase in incidence. Medication-treated GDM increased gradually (trend change 0.23 [95% CI 0.09–0.37] per year), but there was no change in medication-treated GDM using a shorter (3-year) postpolicy period (level change −0.31 [95% CI −0.9 to 0.29]; trend change 0.03 [95% CI −0.36 to 0.43]). We detected no change in infant birth weight outcomes and endocrinology visits. CONCLUSIONS Changing the screening approach substantially increased diagnoses of lifestyle-treated GDM but did not impact medication-treated GDM or infant birth weight.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a Province-Wide Change in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening Policy on Treatment and Newborn Birth Weight\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Nethery, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Julie Lee, Patricia A. Janssen, Laura Schummers\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc25-0480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment and newborn birth weight after a 2010 change in GDM screening recommendations from a two-step (50-g glucose challenge test + 3-h, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] with Carpenter-Coustan criteria) to a mix of one-step and two-step (2-h, 75-g OGTT with International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group criteria). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We estimated effects of the screening change on the incidence of lifestyle or medication treatment, infant birth weight >90th percentile or <10th percentile for gestational age (large and small for gestational age), and endocrinologist visits using interrupted time series analysis in all 463,881 individuals with singleton pregnancies (>28 gestational weeks) from British Columbia, Canada, between 2004 and 2019. RESULTS After the screening change, lifestyle-treated GDM increased immediately (level change 1.85 [95% CI 1.19–2.51]), corresponding to a 1.85% increase in incidence. Medication-treated GDM increased gradually (trend change 0.23 [95% CI 0.09–0.37] per year), but there was no change in medication-treated GDM using a shorter (3-year) postpolicy period (level change −0.31 [95% CI −0.9 to 0.29]; trend change 0.03 [95% CI −0.36 to 0.43]). We detected no change in infant birth weight outcomes and endocrinology visits. CONCLUSIONS Changing the screening approach substantially increased diagnoses of lifestyle-treated GDM but did not impact medication-treated GDM or infant birth weight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0480\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估2010年GDM筛查建议从两步(50 g葡萄糖刺激试验+ 3-h, 100 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验[OGTT]与Carpenter-Coustan标准)改为一步和两步混合(2小时,75 g OGTT与国际妊娠糖尿病协会研究组标准)后,妊娠糖尿病(GDM)治疗和新生儿体重的变化。研究设计和方法我们使用中断时间序列分析,对2004年至2019年加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省所有463,881例单胎妊娠(28胎周)患者的生活方式或药物治疗发生率、婴儿出生体重第90百分位或第10百分位(胎龄大或小)以及内分泌学家就诊情况进行了筛查变化的影响。结果:筛查改变后,生活方式治疗的GDM立即增加(水平变化1.85 [95% CI 1.19-2.51]),相应的发病率增加1.85%。药物治疗的GDM逐渐增加(趋势变化为每年0.23 [95% CI 0.09-0.37]),但在较短(3年)的政策后期间,药物治疗的GDM没有变化(水平变化为- 0.31 [95% CI - 0.9至0.29];趋势变化0.03 [95% CI - 0.36 ~ 0.43])。我们没有发现婴儿出生体重结局和内分泌学就诊的变化。结论:改变筛查方法大大增加了生活方式治疗的GDM的诊断率,但对药物治疗的GDM或婴儿出生体重没有影响。
Effects of a Province-Wide Change in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening Policy on Treatment and Newborn Birth Weight
OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment and newborn birth weight after a 2010 change in GDM screening recommendations from a two-step (50-g glucose challenge test + 3-h, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] with Carpenter-Coustan criteria) to a mix of one-step and two-step (2-h, 75-g OGTT with International Association for Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group criteria). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We estimated effects of the screening change on the incidence of lifestyle or medication treatment, infant birth weight >90th percentile or <10th percentile for gestational age (large and small for gestational age), and endocrinologist visits using interrupted time series analysis in all 463,881 individuals with singleton pregnancies (>28 gestational weeks) from British Columbia, Canada, between 2004 and 2019. RESULTS After the screening change, lifestyle-treated GDM increased immediately (level change 1.85 [95% CI 1.19–2.51]), corresponding to a 1.85% increase in incidence. Medication-treated GDM increased gradually (trend change 0.23 [95% CI 0.09–0.37] per year), but there was no change in medication-treated GDM using a shorter (3-year) postpolicy period (level change −0.31 [95% CI −0.9 to 0.29]; trend change 0.03 [95% CI −0.36 to 0.43]). We detected no change in infant birth weight outcomes and endocrinology visits. CONCLUSIONS Changing the screening approach substantially increased diagnoses of lifestyle-treated GDM but did not impact medication-treated GDM or infant birth weight.
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.