Lucas M Barbosa, Roberto Mazetto, Maria L R Defante, Vânio L J Antunes, Vinicius Martins Rodrigues Oliveira, Douglas Cavalcante, Luanna Paula Garcez de Carvalho Feitoza, Ivo Queiroz, André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira, Guilherme Almeida, Elísio Bulhões, Maria do Carmo P Nunes, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Francisco Darrieux, Josep Brugada
{"title":"人工智能心电图诊断Brugada综合征的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lucas M Barbosa, Roberto Mazetto, Maria L R Defante, Vânio L J Antunes, Vinicius Martins Rodrigues Oliveira, Douglas Cavalcante, Luanna Paula Garcez de Carvalho Feitoza, Ivo Queiroz, André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira, Guilherme Almeida, Elísio Bulhões, Maria do Carmo P Nunes, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Francisco Darrieux, Josep Brugada","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02075-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a serious condition linked to sudden cardiac death in individuals who are otherwise healthy. Notably, drug-induced BrS accounts for 50% to 70% of all documented cases. The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) represents a promising approach for the detection of BrS.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI models in diagnosing BrS through ECG analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on AI-based models for ECG analysis related to BrS detection. Key outcomes measured included sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was using Zhou and Dendukuri I<sup>2</sup> approach. Additionally, a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of each one of the included studies on the pooled results and heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included six studies encompassing ECG data from 2,179 patients, all employing AI algorithms for ECG interpretation. The quantitative analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898, a sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI: 69.6 to 85.9), and a specificity of 87.7% (95% CI: 79.9 to 92.7). Notably, the sensitivity analysis without Zanchi et al., significantly reduced the heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, the other analyses corroborated with our general findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-driven ECG interpretation demonstrates to be a viable option in detecting BrS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence ECGs performance in the diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas M Barbosa, Roberto Mazetto, Maria L R Defante, Vânio L J Antunes, Vinicius Martins Rodrigues Oliveira, Douglas Cavalcante, Luanna Paula Garcez de Carvalho Feitoza, Ivo Queiroz, André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira, Guilherme Almeida, Elísio Bulhões, Maria do Carmo P Nunes, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Francisco Darrieux, Josep Brugada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02075-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a serious condition linked to sudden cardiac death in individuals who are otherwise healthy. Notably, drug-induced BrS accounts for 50% to 70% of all documented cases. The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) represents a promising approach for the detection of BrS.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI models in diagnosing BrS through ECG analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on AI-based models for ECG analysis related to BrS detection. Key outcomes measured included sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was using Zhou and Dendukuri I<sup>2</sup> approach. Additionally, a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of each one of the included studies on the pooled results and heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included six studies encompassing ECG data from 2,179 patients, all employing AI algorithms for ECG interpretation. The quantitative analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898, a sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI: 69.6 to 85.9), and a specificity of 87.7% (95% CI: 79.9 to 92.7). Notably, the sensitivity analysis without Zanchi et al., significantly reduced the heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, the other analyses corroborated with our general findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-driven ECG interpretation demonstrates to be a viable option in detecting BrS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02075-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02075-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence ECGs performance in the diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome.
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a serious condition linked to sudden cardiac death in individuals who are otherwise healthy. Notably, drug-induced BrS accounts for 50% to 70% of all documented cases. The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the analysis of electrocardiograms (ECGs) represents a promising approach for the detection of BrS.
Purpose: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI models in diagnosing BrS through ECG analysis.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, focusing on AI-based models for ECG analysis related to BrS detection. Key outcomes measured included sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was using Zhou and Dendukuri I2 approach. Additionally, a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of each one of the included studies on the pooled results and heterogeneity. All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.2.
Results: Our analysis included six studies encompassing ECG data from 2,179 patients, all employing AI algorithms for ECG interpretation. The quantitative analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898, a sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI: 69.6 to 85.9), and a specificity of 87.7% (95% CI: 79.9 to 92.7). Notably, the sensitivity analysis without Zanchi et al., significantly reduced the heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). However, the other analyses corroborated with our general findings.
Conclusion: AI-driven ECG interpretation demonstrates to be a viable option in detecting BrS.