静脉血栓栓塞患者和医疗保健专业人员常规使用患者报告的结果测量的首次经验。

TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2600-7707
Cindy M M de Jong, Sophie N M Ter Haar, Willem Jan W Bos, Paul L den Exter, Menno V Huisman, Marlon H C Kosterink, Thijs E van Mens, Frederikus A Klok
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞患者和医疗保健专业人员常规使用患者报告的结果测量的首次经验。","authors":"Cindy M M de Jong, Sophie N M Ter Haar, Willem Jan W Bos, Paul L den Exter, Menno V Huisman, Marlon H C Kosterink, Thijs E van Mens, Frederikus A Klok","doi":"10.1055/a-2600-7707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can considerably limit patients' functioning and quality of life. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the full impact of VTE on individual patients can be captured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals with the routine use of PROMs for VTE patients visiting the outpatient clinic, a mixed-methods study was performed at Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. VTE PROMs were incorporated into routine care since March 2023, through a digital application sending patients invitations to complete PROMs. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with patients and involved healthcare professionals. The NoMAD (normalization measure development) questionnaire was used to assess the implementation process from the professionals' perspective. Patients aged ≥18 years who experienced VTE and completed PROMs at two follow-up time points during ≥3 months follow-up and VTE patients who did not complete PROMs at both time points were asked to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients (five completed PROMs; three did not) and four professionals were interviewed. Both patients and professionals experienced the use of PROMs as neutral to predominantly positive (lower limit 3 on a scale of 1-5). All professionals valued the effects of PROMs on their work. Most patients felt the questionnaires contained too many questions. Suggestions to improve the completion rate, accessibility, PROMs content, and the digital tool were shared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROMs were believed to provide additional value during preparation for the appointment and during the consultation. The first experiences of patients and professionals, tending toward positive, can be used to improve PROMs application and support implementation in routine thrombosis care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":"9 ","pages":"a26007707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals with Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Venous Thromboembolism.\",\"authors\":\"Cindy M M de Jong, Sophie N M Ter Haar, Willem Jan W Bos, Paul L den Exter, Menno V Huisman, Marlon H C Kosterink, Thijs E van Mens, Frederikus A Klok\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2600-7707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can considerably limit patients' functioning and quality of life. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the full impact of VTE on individual patients can be captured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals with the routine use of PROMs for VTE patients visiting the outpatient clinic, a mixed-methods study was performed at Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. VTE PROMs were incorporated into routine care since March 2023, through a digital application sending patients invitations to complete PROMs. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with patients and involved healthcare professionals. The NoMAD (normalization measure development) questionnaire was used to assess the implementation process from the professionals' perspective. Patients aged ≥18 years who experienced VTE and completed PROMs at two follow-up time points during ≥3 months follow-up and VTE patients who did not complete PROMs at both time points were asked to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients (five completed PROMs; three did not) and four professionals were interviewed. Both patients and professionals experienced the use of PROMs as neutral to predominantly positive (lower limit 3 on a scale of 1-5). All professionals valued the effects of PROMs on their work. Most patients felt the questionnaires contained too many questions. Suggestions to improve the completion rate, accessibility, PROMs content, and the digital tool were shared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PROMs were believed to provide additional value during preparation for the appointment and during the consultation. The first experiences of patients and professionals, tending toward positive, can be used to improve PROMs application and support implementation in routine thrombosis care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"a26007707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2600-7707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2600-7707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)会严重限制患者的功能和生活质量。使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),可以捕获静脉血栓栓塞对个体患者的全部影响。方法:在荷兰莱顿大学医学中心进行了一项混合方法研究,以评估患者和卫生保健专业人员在门诊例行使用PROMs治疗静脉血栓栓塞患者的经验。自2023年3月以来,VTE prom被纳入常规护理,通过数字应用程序向患者发送完成prom的邀请。定量和定性数据来自对患者和相关医疗保健专业人员的半结构化访谈。采用NoMAD(规范化措施发展)问卷从专业人员的角度评估实施过程。年龄≥18岁且在随访≥3个月的两个随访时间点经历静脉血栓栓塞并完成prom的患者和在两个随访时间点均未完成prom的静脉血栓栓塞患者被要求参加。结果:8例患者(完成PROMs的5例;三位没有)和四位专业人士接受了采访。患者和专业人员都认为PROMs的使用是中性的,主要是阳性的(在1-5的范围内下限为3)。所有专业人士都重视prom对他们工作的影响。多数患者认为问卷问题过多。与会者分享了提高完成率、可访问性、prom内容和数字工具的建议。结论:在准备预约和咨询期间,prom被认为提供了额外的价值。患者和专业人员的初步经验倾向于积极,可用于改善PROMs在血栓常规护理中的应用和支持实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals with Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Venous Thromboembolism.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can considerably limit patients' functioning and quality of life. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the full impact of VTE on individual patients can be captured.

Methods: To evaluate the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals with the routine use of PROMs for VTE patients visiting the outpatient clinic, a mixed-methods study was performed at Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. VTE PROMs were incorporated into routine care since March 2023, through a digital application sending patients invitations to complete PROMs. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with patients and involved healthcare professionals. The NoMAD (normalization measure development) questionnaire was used to assess the implementation process from the professionals' perspective. Patients aged ≥18 years who experienced VTE and completed PROMs at two follow-up time points during ≥3 months follow-up and VTE patients who did not complete PROMs at both time points were asked to participate.

Results: Eight patients (five completed PROMs; three did not) and four professionals were interviewed. Both patients and professionals experienced the use of PROMs as neutral to predominantly positive (lower limit 3 on a scale of 1-5). All professionals valued the effects of PROMs on their work. Most patients felt the questionnaires contained too many questions. Suggestions to improve the completion rate, accessibility, PROMs content, and the digital tool were shared.

Conclusion: PROMs were believed to provide additional value during preparation for the appointment and during the consultation. The first experiences of patients and professionals, tending toward positive, can be used to improve PROMs application and support implementation in routine thrombosis care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信