围产期急诊科利用的社会经济和城乡不平等。

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y
Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina
{"title":"围产期急诊科利用的社会经济和城乡不平等。","authors":"Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic and rural-urban inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period.\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估加拿大阿尔伯塔省不同社会经济和城乡梯度的围产期急诊利用不平等。方法:我们对2011年至2017年艾伯塔省一项基于人群的活产妊娠队列研究进行了二次分析。分析了怀孕期间和产后1年的急诊就诊情况。社会经济地位的评估使用了25个组合组,这些组来自物质和社会剥夺的五分位数。根据艾伯塔省卫生服务部门的分类,城乡居民被分为七个地理组。浓度指数量化了急诊科利用的不平等,分为低(≤0.05)、中(0.06-0.19)和高(≥0.20)。多水平负二项回归模型估计了调整后的比率和95%置信区间,以衡量不同社会经济群体和城乡群体急诊科就诊率的差异,并考虑了个人水平的协变量。结果:在242,514例妊娠中,确定了366,241例急诊就诊。在社会经济群体中观察到中度不平等(浓度指数= - 0.17,95%置信区间- 0.18至- 0.16)。最贫困群体的急诊科就诊率是最贫困群体的1.7倍(调整比率= 1.7;95%置信区间为1.6 ~ 1.8)。城乡连续体之间的不平等更为明显(集中指数为- 0.31(95%置信区间为- 0.32至- 0.30),农村居民使用急诊的次数明显更高。与大都市地区相比,农村中心的急诊科就诊率几乎高出三倍(调整后的比率= 2.9;95%置信区间为2.8至3.0),而偏远农村地区的比率则高出近6倍(调整后的比率= 5.5;95%置信区间为5.3 ~ 5.7)。结论:围产期急诊科使用率的显著不平等在社会经济和城乡梯度中都很明显。这些发现强调需要有针对性的卫生系统干预措施,以改善弱势群体和农村人口获得适当、持续的围产期护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic and rural-urban inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period.

Objective: To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.

Results: Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).

Conclusion: Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信