Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina
{"title":"围产期急诊科利用的社会经济和城乡不平等。","authors":"Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic and rural-urban inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period.\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Ohanian, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Brian H Rowe, Susan Crawford, Susan Jelinski, Maria B Ospina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00945-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioeconomic and rural-urban inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period.
Objective: To assess inequalities in emergency department utilization during the perinatal period across socioeconomic and rural-urban gradients in Alberta, Canada.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a population-based cohort study of live-birth pregnancies in Alberta between 2011 and 2017. Emergency department visits during pregnancy and up to 1-year postpartum were analyzed. Socioeconomic position was assessed using 25 combined groups derived from quintiles of material and social deprivation. Rural-urban residence was categorized into seven geographic groups based on Alberta Health Services' classification. Concentration indexes quantified inequalities in emergency department utilization, categorized as low (≤ 0.05), medium (0.06-0.19), or high (≥ 0.20). Multilevel negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals to measure differences in emergency department visit rates across socioeconomic and rural-urban groups, accounting for individual-level covariates.
Results: Among 242,514 pregnancies, 366,241 emergency department visits were identified. Moderate inequality was observed across socioeconomic groups (concentration index = - 0.17, 95% confidence interval - 0.18 to - 0.16). Rates of emergency department visits were 1.7 times higher among the most deprived groups compared to the least deprived groups (adjusted rate ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 1.8). Inequality across the rural-urban continuum was more pronounced (concentration index of - 0.31 (95% confidence interval - 0.32 to - 0.30), with rural residents experiencing significantly higher emergency department use. Compared to metropolitan areas, emergency department visits were nearly three times higher in rural centers (adjusted rate ratio = 2.9; 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.0) and near six times higher in rural remote areas (adjusted rate ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval 5.3 to 5.7).
Conclusion: Significant inequalities in perinatal emergency department utilization are evident across both socioeconomic and urban-rural gradients. These findings highlight the need for targeted health-system interventions to improve access to appropriate, continuous perinatal care among disadvantaged and rural populations.