足部无血管化骨软骨移植重建桡骨远端关节内骨折月骨小面缺损的最佳供体部位:计算机断层扫描和尸体研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Marianne Therese S Feng, Seo-Jun Lee, Jae Jun Nam, Im Joo Rhyu, In Cheul Choi, Jong Woong Park
{"title":"足部无血管化骨软骨移植重建桡骨远端关节内骨折月骨小面缺损的最佳供体部位:计算机断层扫描和尸体研究。","authors":"Marianne Therese S Feng, Seo-Jun Lee, Jae Jun Nam, Im Joo Rhyu, In Cheul Choi, Jong Woong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify the best donor sites for a nonvascularized osteochondral graft from the foot to reconstruct lunate facet defects in malunited distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six wrist computed tomography (CT) scans, obtained from scaphoid fracture patients, assessed the lunate facet's articular surface for dorsal and volar width, dorsovolar length, and concavity depth. Additionally, 60 foot CT scans, obtained from calcaneus fracture patients, assessed the second and third metatarsals and cuneiforms for dorsal and plantar width, dorsoplantar length, concavity/convexity, inflection point, and articular cartilage thickness. A cadaver study of 20 feet recorded the same parameters along with cartilage thickness using ultrasound and further examined the accessory fibular and tibial facets of the four bones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lunate facet measured 11.4 mm dorsally, 13.9 mm volarly, and 17.4 mm long with a 3 mm concavity. The sizes of dorsal and plantar width and dorsoplantar length of articular surfaces of all four foot bones were large enough for lunate facet reconstruction. The second metatarsal and second cuneiform showed concave and convex surfaces in 100% of the cases, respectively. The third metatarsal was concave in 21.7% and convex in 78.3% of the cases. The third cuneiform was concave in 78.3% and convex in 21.7% of the cases. The cadaver study confirmed similar results, with cartilage thickness ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 mm. The dorsofibular accessory facet was oval and larger on the base of the third metatarsal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The third metatarsal base and third cuneiform are the best donor sites for lunate facet reconstruction. A convex donor site is suboptimal for reconstructing the concave lunate facet; therefore, a preoperative CT scan is mandatory for identifying an appropriate concave donor site.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The study recommends the third metatarsal base or third cuneiform for lunate facet reconstruction in distal radius fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Optimal Donor Site From the Foot as a Nonvascularized Osteochondral Graft for the Reconstruction of Lunate Facet Defects in Distal Radius Intra-Articular Fracture: A Computed Tomography and Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Therese S Feng, Seo-Jun Lee, Jae Jun Nam, Im Joo Rhyu, In Cheul Choi, Jong Woong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify the best donor sites for a nonvascularized osteochondral graft from the foot to reconstruct lunate facet defects in malunited distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six wrist computed tomography (CT) scans, obtained from scaphoid fracture patients, assessed the lunate facet's articular surface for dorsal and volar width, dorsovolar length, and concavity depth. Additionally, 60 foot CT scans, obtained from calcaneus fracture patients, assessed the second and third metatarsals and cuneiforms for dorsal and plantar width, dorsoplantar length, concavity/convexity, inflection point, and articular cartilage thickness. A cadaver study of 20 feet recorded the same parameters along with cartilage thickness using ultrasound and further examined the accessory fibular and tibial facets of the four bones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lunate facet measured 11.4 mm dorsally, 13.9 mm volarly, and 17.4 mm long with a 3 mm concavity. The sizes of dorsal and plantar width and dorsoplantar length of articular surfaces of all four foot bones were large enough for lunate facet reconstruction. The second metatarsal and second cuneiform showed concave and convex surfaces in 100% of the cases, respectively. The third metatarsal was concave in 21.7% and convex in 78.3% of the cases. The third cuneiform was concave in 78.3% and convex in 21.7% of the cases. The cadaver study confirmed similar results, with cartilage thickness ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 mm. The dorsofibular accessory facet was oval and larger on the base of the third metatarsal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The third metatarsal base and third cuneiform are the best donor sites for lunate facet reconstruction. A convex donor site is suboptimal for reconstructing the concave lunate facet; therefore, a preoperative CT scan is mandatory for identifying an appropriate concave donor site.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The study recommends the third metatarsal base or third cuneiform for lunate facet reconstruction in distal radius fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.04.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在为桡骨远端骨折不愈合患者进行足部无血管化骨软骨移植重建月骨小面缺损的最佳供体部位。方法:对舟状骨骨折患者进行56次腕关节CT扫描,评估月骨小面关节面背侧和掌侧宽度、掌侧长度和凹陷深度。此外,从跟骨骨折患者获得的60英尺CT扫描,评估了第二和第三跖骨和楔状骨的背和足底宽度、背跖长度、凹凸度、拐点和关节软骨厚度。一项20英尺的尸体研究使用超声波记录了相同的参数以及软骨厚度,并进一步检查了四块骨头的副腓骨和胫骨面。结果:月骨突背侧为11.4 mm,掌侧为13.9 mm,长17.4 mm,凹度为3mm。4块足骨关节面背、足底宽度和背、足底长度的大小均足以进行月骨小关节面重建。第二跖骨和第二楔形骨均有凹面和凸面,发生率为100%。第三跖骨凹陷21.7%,凸出78.3%。第三楔形骨凹的占78.3%,凸的占21.7%。尸体研究证实了类似的结果,软骨厚度在0.5到0.7毫米之间。腓骨背侧副关节面为椭圆形,在第三跖骨基部较大。结论:第三跖底和第三楔状骨是月骨小关节重建的最佳供体。对于重建凹月骨小面,凸供体是次优的;因此,术前CT扫描是必要的,以确定合适的凹供体部位。临床相关性:该研究推荐在桡骨远端骨折的月骨面重建中使用第三跖骨基底或第三楔状骨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Optimal Donor Site From the Foot as a Nonvascularized Osteochondral Graft for the Reconstruction of Lunate Facet Defects in Distal Radius Intra-Articular Fracture: A Computed Tomography and Cadaveric Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the best donor sites for a nonvascularized osteochondral graft from the foot to reconstruct lunate facet defects in malunited distal radius fractures.

Methods: Fifty-six wrist computed tomography (CT) scans, obtained from scaphoid fracture patients, assessed the lunate facet's articular surface for dorsal and volar width, dorsovolar length, and concavity depth. Additionally, 60 foot CT scans, obtained from calcaneus fracture patients, assessed the second and third metatarsals and cuneiforms for dorsal and plantar width, dorsoplantar length, concavity/convexity, inflection point, and articular cartilage thickness. A cadaver study of 20 feet recorded the same parameters along with cartilage thickness using ultrasound and further examined the accessory fibular and tibial facets of the four bones.

Results: The lunate facet measured 11.4 mm dorsally, 13.9 mm volarly, and 17.4 mm long with a 3 mm concavity. The sizes of dorsal and plantar width and dorsoplantar length of articular surfaces of all four foot bones were large enough for lunate facet reconstruction. The second metatarsal and second cuneiform showed concave and convex surfaces in 100% of the cases, respectively. The third metatarsal was concave in 21.7% and convex in 78.3% of the cases. The third cuneiform was concave in 78.3% and convex in 21.7% of the cases. The cadaver study confirmed similar results, with cartilage thickness ranging from 0.5 to 0.7 mm. The dorsofibular accessory facet was oval and larger on the base of the third metatarsal.

Conclusions: The third metatarsal base and third cuneiform are the best donor sites for lunate facet reconstruction. A convex donor site is suboptimal for reconstructing the concave lunate facet; therefore, a preoperative CT scan is mandatory for identifying an appropriate concave donor site.

Clinical relevance: The study recommends the third metatarsal base or third cuneiform for lunate facet reconstruction in distal radius fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信