学龄前儿童单侧脑瘫和非单侧脑瘫的握力评估。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Griet Dequeker, Emma Detobel, Ellen Dillen, Marie Heymans, Lize Kleeren, Els Ortibus, Lisa Mailleux
{"title":"学龄前儿童单侧脑瘫和非单侧脑瘫的握力评估。","authors":"Griet Dequeker, Emma Detobel, Ellen Dillen, Marie Heymans, Lize Kleeren, Els Ortibus, Lisa Mailleux","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate reliability and validity of two grip strength devices in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) aged 2-6 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed grip strength in 20 pre-school-aged children with predominantly spastic uCP (mean age 4y0 ± 1y2m) and 20 age-matched children without uCP (mean age 3y11m ± 1y3m) using the Martin Vigorimeter and MyoGrip to investigate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients; ICC), known-group validity (comparative statistics) and convergent validity (correlation analyses) in a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, test-retest reliability was excellent for both devices and both hands (ICC 0.91-0.97). Grip strength of the non-preferred hand was lower in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Grip strength was decreased in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In children without uCP, grip strength was lower in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand only for the MyoGrip (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The relation between both devices for both hands was good to very high (<i>r</i> = 0.62-0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both devices can be implemented in clinical practice to assess grip strength in preschool-aged children with uCP. Only the MyoGrip detected differences between both hands in children without uCP and might be more sensitive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assessment of grip strength in preschool-aged children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Griet Dequeker, Emma Detobel, Ellen Dillen, Marie Heymans, Lize Kleeren, Els Ortibus, Lisa Mailleux\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate reliability and validity of two grip strength devices in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) aged 2-6 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed grip strength in 20 pre-school-aged children with predominantly spastic uCP (mean age 4y0 ± 1y2m) and 20 age-matched children without uCP (mean age 3y11m ± 1y3m) using the Martin Vigorimeter and MyoGrip to investigate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients; ICC), known-group validity (comparative statistics) and convergent validity (correlation analyses) in a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, test-retest reliability was excellent for both devices and both hands (ICC 0.91-0.97). Grip strength of the non-preferred hand was lower in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Grip strength was decreased in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In children without uCP, grip strength was lower in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand only for the MyoGrip (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The relation between both devices for both hands was good to very high (<i>r</i> = 0.62-0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both devices can be implemented in clinical practice to assess grip strength in preschool-aged children with uCP. Only the MyoGrip detected differences between both hands in children without uCP and might be more sensitive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨两种握力装置在2 ~ 6岁单侧脑瘫(uCP)患儿中的信度和效度。方法:采用Martin Vigorimeter和MyoGrip对20例以痉挛性uCP为主的学龄前儿童(平均年龄4岁±1岁2米)和20例年龄匹配的无uCP儿童(平均年龄3岁11米±1岁3米)的握力进行评估,研究重测信度(类内相关系数;在横断面设计中,已知组效度(比较统计)和收敛效度(相关分析)。结果:两组设备和双手的重测信度均极好(ICC 0.91-0.97)。两种设备的uCP患儿非首选手的握力较低(p p p = 0.02)。结论:两种仪器均可应用于学龄前uCP患儿握力评估。只有MyoGrip检测到没有uCP的儿童双手之间的差异,可能更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The assessment of grip strength in preschool-aged children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy.

Purpose: To investigate reliability and validity of two grip strength devices in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) aged 2-6 years.

Method: We assessed grip strength in 20 pre-school-aged children with predominantly spastic uCP (mean age 4y0 ± 1y2m) and 20 age-matched children without uCP (mean age 3y11m ± 1y3m) using the Martin Vigorimeter and MyoGrip to investigate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients; ICC), known-group validity (comparative statistics) and convergent validity (correlation analyses) in a cross-sectional design.

Results: In both groups, test-retest reliability was excellent for both devices and both hands (ICC 0.91-0.97). Grip strength of the non-preferred hand was lower in children with uCP for both devices (p < 0.001). Grip strength was decreased in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand in children with uCP for both devices (p < 0.001). In children without uCP, grip strength was lower in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand only for the MyoGrip (p = 0.02). The relation between both devices for both hands was good to very high (r = 0.62-0.92, p < 0.007).

Conclusion: Both devices can be implemented in clinical practice to assess grip strength in preschool-aged children with uCP. Only the MyoGrip detected differences between both hands in children without uCP and might be more sensitive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信