< 1岁儿童腹部手术后切口导管输注罗哌卡因的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Lonneke M Staals, Jaap Dogger, Claudia Keyzer-Dekker, Anneke A Boerlage, Eric F Bokhorst, Jan J van Wijk, Jeroen R Scheepe, Monique van Dijk, Joost van Rosmalen, Saskia N de Wildt
{"title":"< 1岁儿童腹部手术后切口导管输注罗哌卡因的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Lonneke M Staals, Jaap Dogger, Claudia Keyzer-Dekker, Anneke A Boerlage, Eric F Bokhorst, Jan J van Wijk, Jeroen R Scheepe, Monique van Dijk, Joost van Rosmalen, Saskia N de Wildt","doi":"10.1007/s40272-025-00700-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Wound catheter infusion (WCI) with local anesthetics provides effective postoperative analgesia in adults, without adverse effects on wound healing. Studies on WCI in infants are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WCI with ropivacaine as treatment for postoperative pain in infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including children aged < 1 year undergoing open abdominal surgery. Informed consent was obtained. All children received a wound catheter at the end of surgery and were randomized for treatment with either ropivacaine (bolus dose of 2 mg/kg and continuous infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h) (R-group) or placebo (C-group), for 72 h postoperatively. The C-group received morphine 100 mcg/kg intravenously at the end of surgery, the R-group received placebo. Standard analgesia postoperatively was paracetamol intravenously and rescue morphine intravenously. Primary outcome was the cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients needing morphine, area under the curve over 24 hours of COMFORT-B and Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, incidence of adverse events, and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After inclusion of 30 patients, the study was discontinued because of slow recruitment. In two cases, the wound catheter was accidentally displaced directly after surgery, therefore data of 28 children were analyzed (14 R-group, 14 C-group). Median [interquartile range] cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered within 48 hours postoperatively was 0.0 [0.0-642.2] in the R-group, compared with 240.1 [15.1-759.0] in the C-group (P = 0.068). In the R-group, 6/14 children required morphine compared with 13/14 in the C-group (P = 0.013). Pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine stayed below toxic thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cumulative morphine use postoperatively was not significantly different between infants receiving WCI with ropivacaine or placebo, although a lower number in the R-group required morphine. Wound catheter infusion provided adequate analgesia, with no signs of local anesthetic toxicity. The study may have been underpowered because of early discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in EudraCT (2015-002209-12), and the Dutch Trial Registry NTR6130 on 23 November, 2016 (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NL-OMON20504).</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Wound Catheter Infusion with Ropivacaine After Abdominal Surgery in Children Aged < 1 Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lonneke M Staals, Jaap Dogger, Claudia Keyzer-Dekker, Anneke A Boerlage, Eric F Bokhorst, Jan J van Wijk, Jeroen R Scheepe, Monique van Dijk, Joost van Rosmalen, Saskia N de Wildt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40272-025-00700-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Wound catheter infusion (WCI) with local anesthetics provides effective postoperative analgesia in adults, without adverse effects on wound healing. Studies on WCI in infants are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WCI with ropivacaine as treatment for postoperative pain in infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including children aged < 1 year undergoing open abdominal surgery. Informed consent was obtained. All children received a wound catheter at the end of surgery and were randomized for treatment with either ropivacaine (bolus dose of 2 mg/kg and continuous infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h) (R-group) or placebo (C-group), for 72 h postoperatively. The C-group received morphine 100 mcg/kg intravenously at the end of surgery, the R-group received placebo. Standard analgesia postoperatively was paracetamol intravenously and rescue morphine intravenously. Primary outcome was the cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients needing morphine, area under the curve over 24 hours of COMFORT-B and Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, incidence of adverse events, and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After inclusion of 30 patients, the study was discontinued because of slow recruitment. In two cases, the wound catheter was accidentally displaced directly after surgery, therefore data of 28 children were analyzed (14 R-group, 14 C-group). Median [interquartile range] cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered within 48 hours postoperatively was 0.0 [0.0-642.2] in the R-group, compared with 240.1 [15.1-759.0] in the C-group (P = 0.068). In the R-group, 6/14 children required morphine compared with 13/14 in the C-group (P = 0.013). Pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine stayed below toxic thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cumulative morphine use postoperatively was not significantly different between infants receiving WCI with ropivacaine or placebo, although a lower number in the R-group required morphine. Wound catheter infusion provided adequate analgesia, with no signs of local anesthetic toxicity. The study may have been underpowered because of early discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in EudraCT (2015-002209-12), and the Dutch Trial Registry NTR6130 on 23 November, 2016 (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NL-OMON20504).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-025-00700-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-025-00700-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:局部麻醉药伤口导管输注(WCI)是成人术后有效的镇痛方法,且对伤口愈合无不良影响。关于婴儿WCI的研究很少。本研究的目的是探讨WCI联合罗哌卡因治疗婴儿术后疼痛的有效性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,包括儿童年龄。结果:在纳入30例患者后,由于招募缓慢,研究终止。2例患儿术后不慎将创面导管直接移位,故对28例患儿数据进行分析(r组14例,c组14例)。r组术后48 h内吗啡累积剂量(mcg/kg)中位数为0.0 [0.0 ~ 642.2],c组为240.1[15.1 ~ 759.0],差异有统计学意义(P = 0.068)。r组6/14例患儿需要吗啡,c组13/14例患儿需要吗啡(P = 0.013)。组间疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。罗哌卡因血药浓度保持在毒性阈值以下。结论:术后累积吗啡的使用在使用罗哌卡因或安慰剂的WCI婴儿之间没有显著差异,尽管r组需要吗啡的婴儿数量较少。伤口导管输注提供了足够的镇痛,没有局部麻醉毒性的迹象。这项研究可能因为过早中止而力度不足。临床试验注册:该研究已于2016年11月23日在EudraCT(2015-002209-12)和荷兰试验注册中心NTR6130(国际临床试验注册平台NL-OMON20504)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Wound Catheter Infusion with Ropivacaine After Abdominal Surgery in Children Aged < 1 Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and objective: Wound catheter infusion (WCI) with local anesthetics provides effective postoperative analgesia in adults, without adverse effects on wound healing. Studies on WCI in infants are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of WCI with ropivacaine as treatment for postoperative pain in infants.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including children aged < 1 year undergoing open abdominal surgery. Informed consent was obtained. All children received a wound catheter at the end of surgery and were randomized for treatment with either ropivacaine (bolus dose of 2 mg/kg and continuous infusion of 0.2 mg/kg/h) (R-group) or placebo (C-group), for 72 h postoperatively. The C-group received morphine 100 mcg/kg intravenously at the end of surgery, the R-group received placebo. Standard analgesia postoperatively was paracetamol intravenously and rescue morphine intravenously. Primary outcome was the cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of patients needing morphine, area under the curve over 24 hours of COMFORT-B and Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, incidence of adverse events, and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine.

Results: After inclusion of 30 patients, the study was discontinued because of slow recruitment. In two cases, the wound catheter was accidentally displaced directly after surgery, therefore data of 28 children were analyzed (14 R-group, 14 C-group). Median [interquartile range] cumulative amount of morphine (mcg/kg) administered within 48 hours postoperatively was 0.0 [0.0-642.2] in the R-group, compared with 240.1 [15.1-759.0] in the C-group (P = 0.068). In the R-group, 6/14 children required morphine compared with 13/14 in the C-group (P = 0.013). Pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine stayed below toxic thresholds.

Conclusions: Cumulative morphine use postoperatively was not significantly different between infants receiving WCI with ropivacaine or placebo, although a lower number in the R-group required morphine. Wound catheter infusion provided adequate analgesia, with no signs of local anesthetic toxicity. The study may have been underpowered because of early discontinuation.

Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in EudraCT (2015-002209-12), and the Dutch Trial Registry NTR6130 on 23 November, 2016 (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NL-OMON20504).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信