Samaneh Salimian, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Nandini Dendukuri, Negareh Mousavi, James Brophy
{"title":"预测心力衰竭住院后的死亡或再入院:温哥华沿海急性心力衰竭(VOCAL-AHF)登记。","authors":"Samaneh Salimian, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Nandini Dendukuri, Negareh Mousavi, James Brophy","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) readmission and mortality rates remain high among HF patients. Improved and robust risk prediction models for better monitoring, informed decision-making, targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes are required. We developed and validated a patient-centric model to predict long-term outcomes of death or a repeat HF-hospitalisation using a modern model selection approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a contemporary registry of patients discharged alive from an HF-hospitalisation between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019. An integrated and multifaceted selection approach (combining backward selection, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and expert opinion) to Cox-proportional hazard models was used for model development. To account for model uncertainty and improve generalisability, bootstrap-Bayesian Model Averaging was used to derive the final risk model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 1842 patients with a median follow-up time of 529 days (range 2-1459 days). 790 (43%) patients experienced the outcome, with 68 (8.6%) having the outcome within 30 days. The final risk model included 12 variables, of which 8 were identified as being dominant. The top predictors with >99% probability for model inclusion were increasing age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11/5 years), prior HF-diagnoses (1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.71) and lower discharge haemoglobin (1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15/10 g/L). Other predictors (~>60% model-selection probability) included lower admitting systolic blood pressure, higher loop-diuretic discharge requirements, persistent smoking, an admitting non-sinus rhythm and absence of discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription. The 3-year cross-validated c-statistic was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinically oriented prognostic model with moderate discrimination, to predict adverse events postdischarge for HF, has been developed and internally validated. This model, leveraging an integrated approach to selection, shows promise in personalising discharge planning. Future external validation is necessary to confirm its applicability and potential impact on clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting death or readmission following heart failure hospitalisation: the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.\",\"authors\":\"Samaneh Salimian, Nathaniel Mark Hawkins, Nandini Dendukuri, Negareh Mousavi, James Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) readmission and mortality rates remain high among HF patients. Improved and robust risk prediction models for better monitoring, informed decision-making, targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes are required. We developed and validated a patient-centric model to predict long-term outcomes of death or a repeat HF-hospitalisation using a modern model selection approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a contemporary registry of patients discharged alive from an HF-hospitalisation between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019. An integrated and multifaceted selection approach (combining backward selection, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and expert opinion) to Cox-proportional hazard models was used for model development. To account for model uncertainty and improve generalisability, bootstrap-Bayesian Model Averaging was used to derive the final risk model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 1842 patients with a median follow-up time of 529 days (range 2-1459 days). 790 (43%) patients experienced the outcome, with 68 (8.6%) having the outcome within 30 days. The final risk model included 12 variables, of which 8 were identified as being dominant. The top predictors with >99% probability for model inclusion were increasing age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11/5 years), prior HF-diagnoses (1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.71) and lower discharge haemoglobin (1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15/10 g/L). Other predictors (~>60% model-selection probability) included lower admitting systolic blood pressure, higher loop-diuretic discharge requirements, persistent smoking, an admitting non-sinus rhythm and absence of discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription. The 3-year cross-validated c-statistic was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinically oriented prognostic model with moderate discrimination, to predict adverse events postdischarge for HF, has been developed and internally validated. This model, leveraging an integrated approach to selection, shows promise in personalising discharge planning. Future external validation is necessary to confirm its applicability and potential impact on clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心力衰竭(HF)患者的再入院率和死亡率仍然很高。需要改进和强大的风险预测模型,以便更好地监测、知情决策、有针对性的干预和改善患者的预后。我们开发并验证了一个以患者为中心的模型,使用现代模型选择方法预测死亡或重复hf住院的长期结果。方法:我们使用的数据来自2015年4月1日至2019年3月31日期间hf住院患者的当代登记数据。对Cox-proportional hazard models采用综合的、多方面的选择方法(结合逆向选择、最小绝对收缩、选择算子和专家意见)进行模型开发。为了考虑模型的不确定性和提高通用性,采用自举-贝叶斯模型平均法推导最终的风险模型。结果:该队列包括1842例患者,中位随访时间为529天(范围2-1459天)。790例(43%)患者出现了结果,68例(8.6%)患者在30天内出现结果。最终的风险模型包括12个变量,其中8个被确定为主导变量。模型纳入概率最高的预测因子为:年龄增加(HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 ~ 1.11/5年)、既往hf诊断(HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 ~ 1.71)和排出血红蛋白(HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.15/10 g/L)。其他预测因子(~ bbb60 %模型选择概率)包括入院收缩压较低,利尿环排出要求较高,持续吸烟,入院非窦性心律,以及未开血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素受体-奈普利素抑制剂处方。3年交叉验证的c统计量为0.63 (95% CI 0.61 ~ 0.65)。结论:一个以临床为导向的中度鉴别预后模型已被开发并内部验证,用于预测心衰出院后的不良事件。该模型利用综合选择方法,在个性化出院计划方面显示出希望。未来的外部验证是必要的,以确认其适用性和对临床实践的潜在影响。
Predicting death or readmission following heart failure hospitalisation: the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.
Background: Heart failure (HF) readmission and mortality rates remain high among HF patients. Improved and robust risk prediction models for better monitoring, informed decision-making, targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes are required. We developed and validated a patient-centric model to predict long-term outcomes of death or a repeat HF-hospitalisation using a modern model selection approach.
Methods: We used data from a contemporary registry of patients discharged alive from an HF-hospitalisation between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2019. An integrated and multifaceted selection approach (combining backward selection, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and expert opinion) to Cox-proportional hazard models was used for model development. To account for model uncertainty and improve generalisability, bootstrap-Bayesian Model Averaging was used to derive the final risk model.
Results: The cohort included 1842 patients with a median follow-up time of 529 days (range 2-1459 days). 790 (43%) patients experienced the outcome, with 68 (8.6%) having the outcome within 30 days. The final risk model included 12 variables, of which 8 were identified as being dominant. The top predictors with >99% probability for model inclusion were increasing age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11/5 years), prior HF-diagnoses (1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.71) and lower discharge haemoglobin (1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15/10 g/L). Other predictors (~>60% model-selection probability) included lower admitting systolic blood pressure, higher loop-diuretic discharge requirements, persistent smoking, an admitting non-sinus rhythm and absence of discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor prescription. The 3-year cross-validated c-statistic was 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65).
Conclusions: A clinically oriented prognostic model with moderate discrimination, to predict adverse events postdischarge for HF, has been developed and internally validated. This model, leveraging an integrated approach to selection, shows promise in personalising discharge planning. Future external validation is necessary to confirm its applicability and potential impact on clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.