Alexis L Green, Randy Le, Erik J Rodriquez, Anna M Nápoles, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable, Paula D Strassle
{"title":"患者-临床医生性别、种族和/或民族一致性和遵守预防服务指南:MEPS 2018-2020。","authors":"Alexis L Green, Randy Le, Erik J Rodriquez, Anna M Nápoles, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable, Paula D Strassle","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09631-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-clinician sex, racial, and ethnic concordance have been shown to improve healthcare utilization, but the impact of each on adherence to preventive services guidelines among specific populations remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between patient-clinician sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance and adherence to preventive services guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2018, 2020).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults ≥ 18 years old who reported having a usual healthcare clinician. Adults who identified as multiracial, identified their clinician as being multiracial, or who did not report clinician sex, race, or ethnicity were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Adherence to preventive services guidelines for influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines; breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening; and blood pressure and cholesterol screening. Predicted marginal prevalences and prevalence ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, and self-reported health status.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Females were less likely to report sex concordance compared to males (52.5% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.01). Among females, sex concordance increased influenza (PR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), pneumococcal (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11), and shingles (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.17) vaccination, as well as breast (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.10), cervical (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05-1.13), and colorectal (PR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10) cancer screening, but not among males. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, Latino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients (< 25%) and was not associated with adherence in preventive services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females with female clinicians are more likely to adhere to preventive services guidelines. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with adherence to preventive services guidelines, but racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among non-White patients. Sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance may be a powerful tool for increasing preventive services utilization, but increased racial and/or ethnic concordance is needed to reach more definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Clinician Sex and Race and/or Ethnicity Concordance and Adherence to Preventive Services Guidelines: MEPS 2018-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis L Green, Randy Le, Erik J Rodriquez, Anna M Nápoles, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable, Paula D Strassle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09631-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-clinician sex, racial, and ethnic concordance have been shown to improve healthcare utilization, but the impact of each on adherence to preventive services guidelines among specific populations remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between patient-clinician sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance and adherence to preventive services guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2018, 2020).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults ≥ 18 years old who reported having a usual healthcare clinician. Adults who identified as multiracial, identified their clinician as being multiracial, or who did not report clinician sex, race, or ethnicity were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Adherence to preventive services guidelines for influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines; breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening; and blood pressure and cholesterol screening. Predicted marginal prevalences and prevalence ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, and self-reported health status.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Females were less likely to report sex concordance compared to males (52.5% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.01). Among females, sex concordance increased influenza (PR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), pneumococcal (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11), and shingles (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.17) vaccination, as well as breast (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.10), cervical (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05-1.13), and colorectal (PR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10) cancer screening, but not among males. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, Latino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients (< 25%) and was not associated with adherence in preventive services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females with female clinicians are more likely to adhere to preventive services guidelines. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with adherence to preventive services guidelines, but racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among non-White patients. Sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance may be a powerful tool for increasing preventive services utilization, but increased racial and/or ethnic concordance is needed to reach more definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09631-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09631-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:患者-临床医生的性别、种族和民族一致性已被证明可以提高医疗保健的利用率,但在特定人群中,每种一致性对遵守预防服务指南的影响尚不清楚。目的:评估患者-临床医生的性别、种族和/或民族一致性和对预防服务指南的依从性之间的关系。设计:横断面研究,使用医疗支出小组调查(2018年、2020年)的全国代表性数据。参与者:≥18岁的成年人,报告有常规的医疗保健临床医生。认为自己是多种族的成年人、认为自己的临床医生是多种族的成年人,或者没有报告临床医生的性别、种族或民族的成年人被排除在外。主要措施:遵守流感、肺炎球菌和带状疱疹疫苗预防服务指南;乳腺癌、子宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查;还有血压和胆固醇检测。预测的边际患病率和患病率使用多变量逻辑回归估计,调整社会人口统计学、慢性病和自我报告的健康状况。关键结果:与男性相比,女性报告性别一致性的可能性更低(52.5% vs. 69.8%)。结论:女性临床医生更有可能遵守预防服务指南。种族和/或民族一致性与遵守预防服务指南无关,但非白人患者的种族和/或民族一致性较低。性别和种族和/或族裔的一致性可能是提高预防服务利用率的有力工具,但需要加强种族和/或族裔的一致性才能得出更明确的结论。
Patient-Clinician Sex and Race and/or Ethnicity Concordance and Adherence to Preventive Services Guidelines: MEPS 2018-2020.
Background: Patient-clinician sex, racial, and ethnic concordance have been shown to improve healthcare utilization, but the impact of each on adherence to preventive services guidelines among specific populations remains unclear.
Objective: To estimate the association between patient-clinician sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance and adherence to preventive services guidelines.
Design: Cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2018, 2020).
Participants: Adults ≥ 18 years old who reported having a usual healthcare clinician. Adults who identified as multiracial, identified their clinician as being multiracial, or who did not report clinician sex, race, or ethnicity were excluded.
Main measures: Adherence to preventive services guidelines for influenza, pneumococcal, and shingles vaccines; breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening; and blood pressure and cholesterol screening. Predicted marginal prevalences and prevalence ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, chronic conditions, and self-reported health status.
Key results: Females were less likely to report sex concordance compared to males (52.5% vs. 69.8%, p < 0.01). Among females, sex concordance increased influenza (PR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), pneumococcal (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11), and shingles (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.17) vaccination, as well as breast (PR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.10), cervical (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.05-1.13), and colorectal (PR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10) cancer screening, but not among males. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among American Indian and Alaska Native, Black, Latino, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients (< 25%) and was not associated with adherence in preventive services.
Conclusions: Females with female clinicians are more likely to adhere to preventive services guidelines. Racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with adherence to preventive services guidelines, but racial and/or ethnic concordance was low among non-White patients. Sex and racial and/or ethnic concordance may be a powerful tool for increasing preventive services utilization, but increased racial and/or ethnic concordance is needed to reach more definitive conclusions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.