两性霉素b负载金属-有机结构(AmB-ZIF-8)作为实验性皮肤利什曼病皮肤药物转运体的生物相容性和有效性。

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JEP.S511808
Heider Carreño, Jorge Osorio, Enrique Mejía-Ospino, Patricia Escobar
{"title":"两性霉素b负载金属-有机结构(AmB-ZIF-8)作为实验性皮肤利什曼病皮肤药物转运体的生物相容性和有效性。","authors":"Heider Carreño, Jorge Osorio, Enrique Mejía-Ospino, Patricia Escobar","doi":"10.2147/JEP.S511808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as topical drug delivery systems (DDS) for antileishmanial drugs is limited. This study outlines our strategies for developing MOF-drug conjugate as a topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in mice infected with <i>Leishmania (L). amazonensis</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected conjugates from two commercial MOFs (ZIF-8 and Fe-BTC) and seven antileishmanial compounds. Amphotericin B (AmB) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (AmB@ZIF-8) were chosen and prepared at an AmB: ZIF-8 ratio of 1.5:1.0 using the impregnation method. Conjugates were characterised using dynamic light scattering, UV-Vis, FTIR, and SEM. Hydrogels were prepared and evaluated for toxicity and efficacy in CL-BALB/c mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited a 59.6% loading capacity, 6.67% encapsulation efficiency, and 2% in vitro drug release (IVR). The particle size of AmB@ZIF-8 was smaller and more polydisperse than ZIF-8 (1370 nm vs 2537 nm). The conjugation of AmB to ZIF-8 was demonstrated. AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited similar antileishmanial activity to AmB against promastigotes. Topical 0.5% AmB@ZIF-8 and 0.5% AmB hydrogels, administered for 30 days, were unable to decrease lesion sizes or parasite loads. Initially, there was stabilisation of the lesion size; however, the lesions subsequently increased considerably during the 30-day follow-up period. The MOF-hydrogel treatment was non-irritating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were very low EE% and AmB IVR. AmB@ZIF-8 and AmB hydrogels were found to be safe but ineffective against CL-infected mice. Several factors may explain these negative results, including the large size of the commercial ZIF-8, the aggregation of AmB in solution, the excess AmB used for impregnation, and the conditions of the IVR assay. We suggest continuing to use ZIF-8 as a DDS due to its sensitivity to acidic pH levels; however, we recommend reducing the particle size and lowering the drug-to-ZIF-8 ratio. Other alternatives are discussed in the present paper. We also advocate investigating alternative antileishmanial drugs as cargo, such as miltefosine or pentamidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":15846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"17 ","pages":"269-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biocompatibility and Effectiveness of Amphotericin B-Loaded Metal-Organic Structures (AmB-ZIF-8) as Dermal Drug Transporters in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.\",\"authors\":\"Heider Carreño, Jorge Osorio, Enrique Mejía-Ospino, Patricia Escobar\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JEP.S511808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as topical drug delivery systems (DDS) for antileishmanial drugs is limited. This study outlines our strategies for developing MOF-drug conjugate as a topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in mice infected with <i>Leishmania (L). amazonensis</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected conjugates from two commercial MOFs (ZIF-8 and Fe-BTC) and seven antileishmanial compounds. Amphotericin B (AmB) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (AmB@ZIF-8) were chosen and prepared at an AmB: ZIF-8 ratio of 1.5:1.0 using the impregnation method. Conjugates were characterised using dynamic light scattering, UV-Vis, FTIR, and SEM. Hydrogels were prepared and evaluated for toxicity and efficacy in CL-BALB/c mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited a 59.6% loading capacity, 6.67% encapsulation efficiency, and 2% in vitro drug release (IVR). The particle size of AmB@ZIF-8 was smaller and more polydisperse than ZIF-8 (1370 nm vs 2537 nm). The conjugation of AmB to ZIF-8 was demonstrated. AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited similar antileishmanial activity to AmB against promastigotes. Topical 0.5% AmB@ZIF-8 and 0.5% AmB hydrogels, administered for 30 days, were unable to decrease lesion sizes or parasite loads. Initially, there was stabilisation of the lesion size; however, the lesions subsequently increased considerably during the 30-day follow-up period. The MOF-hydrogel treatment was non-irritating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were very low EE% and AmB IVR. AmB@ZIF-8 and AmB hydrogels were found to be safe but ineffective against CL-infected mice. Several factors may explain these negative results, including the large size of the commercial ZIF-8, the aggregation of AmB in solution, the excess AmB used for impregnation, and the conditions of the IVR assay. We suggest continuing to use ZIF-8 as a DDS due to its sensitivity to acidic pH levels; however, we recommend reducing the particle size and lowering the drug-to-ZIF-8 ratio. Other alternatives are discussed in the present paper. We also advocate investigating alternative antileishmanial drugs as cargo, such as miltefosine or pentamidine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"269-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S511808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S511808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于金属有机框架(MOFs)作为抗利什曼药物的局部给药系统(DDS)的信息有限。本研究概述了我们开发mof -药物偶联物的策略,作为局部治疗皮肤利什曼病(CL)的小鼠感染亚马逊利什曼原虫(L)。方法:从ZIF-8和Fe-BTC两种商业mof化合物和7种抗利什曼原虫化合物中选择偶联物。选择两性霉素B (AmB)和咪唑酸分子筛骨架-8 (AmB@ZIF-8),以AmB: ZIF-8的比例为1.5:1.0的浸渍法制备。用动态光散射、紫外可见、红外光谱和扫描电镜对共轭物进行了表征。制备水凝胶,并对CL-BALB/c小鼠进行毒性和药效评价。结果:AmB@ZIF-8的载药量为59.6%,包封率为6.67%,体外释药率为2%。AmB@ZIF-8的粒径比ZIF-8更小,分散性更强(1370 nm vs 2537 nm)。证实了AmB与ZIF-8的结合。AmB@ZIF-8对promastigotes的抗利什曼原虫活性与AmB相似。局部使用0.5% AmB@ZIF-8和0.5% AmB水凝胶30天,不能减少病变大小或寄生虫负荷。最初,病变大小稳定;然而,病变随后在30天的随访期间显著增加。mof -水凝胶处理无刺激性。结论:患者EE%和AmB IVR均较低。AmB@ZIF-8和AmB水凝胶对感染cl的小鼠安全但无效。有几个因素可以解释这些阴性结果,包括商业ZIF-8的大尺寸,溶液中AmB的聚集,用于浸渍的过量AmB,以及IVR试验的条件。我们建议继续使用ZIF-8作为DDS,因为它对酸性pH值敏感;然而,我们建议减小颗粒尺寸并降低药物与zif -8的比例。本文还讨论了其他替代方案。我们也提倡研究其他抗利什曼病药物作为货物,如米替福辛或喷他脒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biocompatibility and Effectiveness of Amphotericin B-Loaded Metal-Organic Structures (AmB-ZIF-8) as Dermal Drug Transporters in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Purpose: Information on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as topical drug delivery systems (DDS) for antileishmanial drugs is limited. This study outlines our strategies for developing MOF-drug conjugate as a topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in mice infected with Leishmania (L). amazonensis.

Methods: We selected conjugates from two commercial MOFs (ZIF-8 and Fe-BTC) and seven antileishmanial compounds. Amphotericin B (AmB) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (AmB@ZIF-8) were chosen and prepared at an AmB: ZIF-8 ratio of 1.5:1.0 using the impregnation method. Conjugates were characterised using dynamic light scattering, UV-Vis, FTIR, and SEM. Hydrogels were prepared and evaluated for toxicity and efficacy in CL-BALB/c mice.

Results: AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited a 59.6% loading capacity, 6.67% encapsulation efficiency, and 2% in vitro drug release (IVR). The particle size of AmB@ZIF-8 was smaller and more polydisperse than ZIF-8 (1370 nm vs 2537 nm). The conjugation of AmB to ZIF-8 was demonstrated. AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited similar antileishmanial activity to AmB against promastigotes. Topical 0.5% AmB@ZIF-8 and 0.5% AmB hydrogels, administered for 30 days, were unable to decrease lesion sizes or parasite loads. Initially, there was stabilisation of the lesion size; however, the lesions subsequently increased considerably during the 30-day follow-up period. The MOF-hydrogel treatment was non-irritating.

Conclusion: There were very low EE% and AmB IVR. AmB@ZIF-8 and AmB hydrogels were found to be safe but ineffective against CL-infected mice. Several factors may explain these negative results, including the large size of the commercial ZIF-8, the aggregation of AmB in solution, the excess AmB used for impregnation, and the conditions of the IVR assay. We suggest continuing to use ZIF-8 as a DDS due to its sensitivity to acidic pH levels; however, we recommend reducing the particle size and lowering the drug-to-ZIF-8 ratio. Other alternatives are discussed in the present paper. We also advocate investigating alternative antileishmanial drugs as cargo, such as miltefosine or pentamidine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology
Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信