一项随机临床试验:传统和透明双牙块的牙疗效比较。

Q4 Dentistry
Ahmad Behroozian, Anahita Pourahmad, Mahsa Zali, Amir Zandesh
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:传统和透明双牙块的牙疗效比较。","authors":"Ahmad Behroozian, Anahita Pourahmad, Mahsa Zali, Amir Zandesh","doi":"10.34172/joddd.025.41445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growth modification is a strategy for the treatment of skeletal Cl II patients. Clear twin block (CTB) is a modification of traditional twin block (TTB), which is made from thermoplastic sheets instead of acrylic resin and wire. This study compared the dental effects of the clear and TTBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 60 growing skeletal Cl II patients with dental Cl II div 1 malocclusion were selected and randomly divided into two groups: TTB and CTB. Cephalometric radiography and stone models were taken before treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) and six months (T<sub>2</sub>) after appliance insertion. Data were analyzed using independent t-test and paired t-test at the 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between CTB and TTB in IMPA at T<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i><0.05). Intragroup comparisons showed no significant change from T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> in the CTB group and for U1-SN and U1-Pal amounts in the TTB group. T1-T2 comparison showed a significant change in IMPA in the TTB group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTB showed more protrusion of lower incisors compared to CTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"19 1","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of dental effects of traditional and clear twin block: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Behroozian, Anahita Pourahmad, Mahsa Zali, Amir Zandesh\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/joddd.025.41445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growth modification is a strategy for the treatment of skeletal Cl II patients. Clear twin block (CTB) is a modification of traditional twin block (TTB), which is made from thermoplastic sheets instead of acrylic resin and wire. This study compared the dental effects of the clear and TTBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, 60 growing skeletal Cl II patients with dental Cl II div 1 malocclusion were selected and randomly divided into two groups: TTB and CTB. Cephalometric radiography and stone models were taken before treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) and six months (T<sub>2</sub>) after appliance insertion. Data were analyzed using independent t-test and paired t-test at the 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between CTB and TTB in IMPA at T<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i><0.05). Intragroup comparisons showed no significant change from T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> in the CTB group and for U1-SN and U1-Pal amounts in the TTB group. T1-T2 comparison showed a significant change in IMPA in the TTB group (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTB showed more protrusion of lower incisors compared to CTB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"57-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.025.41445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.025.41445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生长修饰是治疗骨骼Cl II患者的一种策略。透明双块(CTB)是对传统双块(TTB)的改进,它由热塑性薄板而不是丙烯酸树脂和金属丝制成。本研究比较了清洁和ttb对牙齿的影响。方法:采用随机临床试验方法,选择60例生长期骨骼肌Cl II牙Cl II div 1错牙合患者,随机分为TTB组和CTB组。治疗前(T1)和植入矫治器后6个月(T2)分别拍摄头颅x线片和结石模型。数据分析采用独立t检验和配对t检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:CTB组与TTB在T2时的IMPA (P1 ~ T2)及TTB组的U1-SN、U1-Pal量差异均有统计学意义。T1-T2比较显示TTB组的IMPA有显著变化(p)。结论:TTB组较CTB组表现出更多的下门牙前突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of dental effects of traditional and clear twin block: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: Growth modification is a strategy for the treatment of skeletal Cl II patients. Clear twin block (CTB) is a modification of traditional twin block (TTB), which is made from thermoplastic sheets instead of acrylic resin and wire. This study compared the dental effects of the clear and TTBs.

Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 60 growing skeletal Cl II patients with dental Cl II div 1 malocclusion were selected and randomly divided into two groups: TTB and CTB. Cephalometric radiography and stone models were taken before treatment (T1) and six months (T2) after appliance insertion. Data were analyzed using independent t-test and paired t-test at the 0.05 significance level.

Results: There was a significant difference between CTB and TTB in IMPA at T2 (P<0.05). Intragroup comparisons showed no significant change from T1 to T2 in the CTB group and for U1-SN and U1-Pal amounts in the TTB group. T1-T2 comparison showed a significant change in IMPA in the TTB group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: TTB showed more protrusion of lower incisors compared to CTB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信