一项混合方法研究,描述医学肿瘤学家使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗乳腺癌的经验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kimberley T Lee, Bihe Hu, Dinorah Martinez Tyson, Carley Geiss, Susan T Vadaparampil, Heather S L Jim, Clement K Gwede, Hatem H Soliman, N Lynn Henry, Dawn L Hershman
{"title":"一项混合方法研究,描述医学肿瘤学家使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂治疗乳腺癌的经验。","authors":"Kimberley T Lee, Bihe Hu, Dinorah Martinez Tyson, Carley Geiss, Susan T Vadaparampil, Heather S L Jim, Clement K Gwede, Hatem H Soliman, N Lynn Henry, Dawn L Hershman","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07734-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) for the treatment of breast cancer in pre-menopausal women is low and little is known about medical oncologist' attitudes toward current guidelines pertaining to the use of OFS. This purpose of this study was to explore breast medical oncologists' perceptions and use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists as OFS for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative survey exploring experiences with OFS was distributed to medical oncologists across the USA using mailing lists available through the American Medical Association. Survey responses were characterized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oncologists in this study reported high likelihood of recommending OFS for pre-menopausal women at high risk for recurrence of hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. In addition to tumor size, nodal involvement, and 21-gene recurrence scores, administration of chemotherapy was a strong surrogate for risk of recurrence. Concerns about treatment toxicity and patient hesitancy were the top barriers to OFS utilization. Oncologists also reported low confidence in their ability to determine menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea post-chemotherapy (9% reported feeling very confident with this task) and to monitor ovarian function while on OFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncologists reported strong agreement with established guidelines for the use of OFS in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, our findings indicate a need for guidance regarding the determination of menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea and monitoring of ovarian function.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods study characterizing experiences of medical oncologists' use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for treatment of breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley T Lee, Bihe Hu, Dinorah Martinez Tyson, Carley Geiss, Susan T Vadaparampil, Heather S L Jim, Clement K Gwede, Hatem H Soliman, N Lynn Henry, Dawn L Hershman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07734-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) for the treatment of breast cancer in pre-menopausal women is low and little is known about medical oncologist' attitudes toward current guidelines pertaining to the use of OFS. This purpose of this study was to explore breast medical oncologists' perceptions and use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists as OFS for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative survey exploring experiences with OFS was distributed to medical oncologists across the USA using mailing lists available through the American Medical Association. Survey responses were characterized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oncologists in this study reported high likelihood of recommending OFS for pre-menopausal women at high risk for recurrence of hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. In addition to tumor size, nodal involvement, and 21-gene recurrence scores, administration of chemotherapy was a strong surrogate for risk of recurrence. Concerns about treatment toxicity and patient hesitancy were the top barriers to OFS utilization. Oncologists also reported low confidence in their ability to determine menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea post-chemotherapy (9% reported feeling very confident with this task) and to monitor ovarian function while on OFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncologists reported strong agreement with established guidelines for the use of OFS in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, our findings indicate a need for guidance regarding the determination of menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea and monitoring of ovarian function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07734-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07734-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用卵巢功能抑制(OFS)治疗绝经前妇女乳腺癌的比例很低,而且肿瘤内科医生对目前有关使用OFS的指南的态度知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨乳腺医学肿瘤学家对促性腺激素释放激素激动剂作为OFS治疗早期乳腺癌的认知和使用。方法:通过美国医学协会提供的邮件列表,向美国各地的肿瘤内科医生分发了一份定量调查,探讨了使用OFS的经验。调查结果采用描述性统计特征。结果:在这项研究中,肿瘤学家报告了对激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌复发风险高的绝经前妇女推荐OFS的可能性很高。除了肿瘤大小、淋巴结累及程度和21基因复发评分外,化疗给药是复发风险的有力替代指标。对治疗毒性和患者犹豫的担忧是OFS应用的最大障碍。肿瘤学家还报告说,在化疗后闭经的情况下,他们对确定绝经状态的能力缺乏信心(9%的人报告说他们对这项任务非常有信心),并且在OFS期间监测卵巢功能。结论:肿瘤学家报告了在早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌治疗中使用OFS的既定指南。然而,我们的研究结果表明,需要在闭经和监测卵巢功能的情况下确定绝经状态的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed-methods study characterizing experiences of medical oncologists' use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for treatment of breast cancer.

Purpose: The use of ovarian function suppression (OFS) for the treatment of breast cancer in pre-menopausal women is low and little is known about medical oncologist' attitudes toward current guidelines pertaining to the use of OFS. This purpose of this study was to explore breast medical oncologists' perceptions and use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists as OFS for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Methods: A quantitative survey exploring experiences with OFS was distributed to medical oncologists across the USA using mailing lists available through the American Medical Association. Survey responses were characterized using descriptive statistics.

Results: Oncologists in this study reported high likelihood of recommending OFS for pre-menopausal women at high risk for recurrence of hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. In addition to tumor size, nodal involvement, and 21-gene recurrence scores, administration of chemotherapy was a strong surrogate for risk of recurrence. Concerns about treatment toxicity and patient hesitancy were the top barriers to OFS utilization. Oncologists also reported low confidence in their ability to determine menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea post-chemotherapy (9% reported feeling very confident with this task) and to monitor ovarian function while on OFS.

Conclusion: Oncologists reported strong agreement with established guidelines for the use of OFS in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, our findings indicate a need for guidance regarding the determination of menopausal status in the setting of amenorrhea and monitoring of ovarian function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信