{"title":"土工膜变形方法对土工膜-干GCL界面剪切性能的影响","authors":"Juan Hou , Xuelei Xie , Craig H. Benson","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effect of geomembrane texturing method on interface shear behavior between textured geomembranes (GM) and the nonwoven side of a dry geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) was evaluated using large-scale direct shear tests conducted using geomembranes with four different types of texturing and a range of asperity heights: impinged texturing (GMTI), coextruded texturing (GMTC), low asperity embossed texturing (GMTE<sub>L</sub>), and high asperity embossed texturing (GMTE<sub>H</sub>). The GCL contained granular bentonite between woven and nonwoven geotextiles bonded by needlepunching. Tests were conducted on the dry GCL to isolate GM-GCL interface behavior from other factors. All interfaces exhibited similar strain-softening shear behavior. Type of texturing had a strong influence on GM-GCL interface behavior. Comparable shear-displacement curves involving direct surface engagement between the texturing asperities and geotextile fibers were obtained with GMTI and GMTC. GMTI texturing delaminated during shear, reducing geotextile combing compared to GMTC. The GMTE<sub>L</sub> engaged the geotextile on the GCL via tip penetration and surface friction, as evinced by striations on the GCL surface, resulting in the lowest interface strengths of the textured GMs. GMTE<sub>H</sub> engaged deep into the interior of the GCL, resulting in dilation, tearing of the geotextile, furrows in the bentonite, and the highest interface strength of those tested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 1185-1199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of geomembrane texturing method on geomembrane-dry GCL interface shear behavior\",\"authors\":\"Juan Hou , Xuelei Xie , Craig H. Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effect of geomembrane texturing method on interface shear behavior between textured geomembranes (GM) and the nonwoven side of a dry geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) was evaluated using large-scale direct shear tests conducted using geomembranes with four different types of texturing and a range of asperity heights: impinged texturing (GMTI), coextruded texturing (GMTC), low asperity embossed texturing (GMTE<sub>L</sub>), and high asperity embossed texturing (GMTE<sub>H</sub>). The GCL contained granular bentonite between woven and nonwoven geotextiles bonded by needlepunching. Tests were conducted on the dry GCL to isolate GM-GCL interface behavior from other factors. All interfaces exhibited similar strain-softening shear behavior. Type of texturing had a strong influence on GM-GCL interface behavior. Comparable shear-displacement curves involving direct surface engagement between the texturing asperities and geotextile fibers were obtained with GMTI and GMTC. GMTI texturing delaminated during shear, reducing geotextile combing compared to GMTC. The GMTE<sub>L</sub> engaged the geotextile on the GCL via tip penetration and surface friction, as evinced by striations on the GCL surface, resulting in the lowest interface strengths of the textured GMs. GMTE<sub>H</sub> engaged deep into the interior of the GCL, resulting in dilation, tearing of the geotextile, furrows in the bentonite, and the highest interface strength of those tested.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1185-1199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000615\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of geomembrane texturing method on geomembrane-dry GCL interface shear behavior
Effect of geomembrane texturing method on interface shear behavior between textured geomembranes (GM) and the nonwoven side of a dry geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) was evaluated using large-scale direct shear tests conducted using geomembranes with four different types of texturing and a range of asperity heights: impinged texturing (GMTI), coextruded texturing (GMTC), low asperity embossed texturing (GMTEL), and high asperity embossed texturing (GMTEH). The GCL contained granular bentonite between woven and nonwoven geotextiles bonded by needlepunching. Tests were conducted on the dry GCL to isolate GM-GCL interface behavior from other factors. All interfaces exhibited similar strain-softening shear behavior. Type of texturing had a strong influence on GM-GCL interface behavior. Comparable shear-displacement curves involving direct surface engagement between the texturing asperities and geotextile fibers were obtained with GMTI and GMTC. GMTI texturing delaminated during shear, reducing geotextile combing compared to GMTC. The GMTEL engaged the geotextile on the GCL via tip penetration and surface friction, as evinced by striations on the GCL surface, resulting in the lowest interface strengths of the textured GMs. GMTEH engaged deep into the interior of the GCL, resulting in dilation, tearing of the geotextile, furrows in the bentonite, and the highest interface strength of those tested.
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.