{"title":"私教学习中放松差别隐私的基准:一项比较调查","authors":"Zhaolong Zheng, Lin Yao, Haibo Hu, Guowei Wu","doi":"10.1145/3729216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential privacy (DP), a rigorously quantifiable privacy preservation technique, has found widespread application within the domain of machine learning. As DP techniques are implemented in machine learning algorithms, a significant and intricate trade-off between privacy and utility emerges, garnering extensive attention from researchers. In the pursuit of striking a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding sensitive data and optimizing its utility, researchers have introduced various variants of Relaxed Differential Privacy (RDP) definitions. These nuanced formulations, however, exhibit substantial diversity in their underlying principles and interpretations of the core concept of DP, thereby engendering a current void in the comprehensive synthesis of these related works. The principal objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, it aims to provide a comprehensive summary of pertinent research endeavors pertaining to RDP within the realm of machine learning. Secondly, it endeavors to empirically assess the impact on both privacy and utility stemming from machine learning algorithms founded upon these RDP definitions. Additionally, this article undertakes a systematic analysis of the foundational principles underpinning distinct variants of relaxed definitions, culminating in the development of a taxonomy that categorizes these RDP definitions.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking Relaxed Differential Privacy in Private Learning: A Comparative Survey\",\"authors\":\"Zhaolong Zheng, Lin Yao, Haibo Hu, Guowei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3729216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differential privacy (DP), a rigorously quantifiable privacy preservation technique, has found widespread application within the domain of machine learning. As DP techniques are implemented in machine learning algorithms, a significant and intricate trade-off between privacy and utility emerges, garnering extensive attention from researchers. In the pursuit of striking a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding sensitive data and optimizing its utility, researchers have introduced various variants of Relaxed Differential Privacy (RDP) definitions. These nuanced formulations, however, exhibit substantial diversity in their underlying principles and interpretations of the core concept of DP, thereby engendering a current void in the comprehensive synthesis of these related works. The principal objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, it aims to provide a comprehensive summary of pertinent research endeavors pertaining to RDP within the realm of machine learning. Secondly, it endeavors to empirically assess the impact on both privacy and utility stemming from machine learning algorithms founded upon these RDP definitions. Additionally, this article undertakes a systematic analysis of the foundational principles underpinning distinct variants of relaxed definitions, culminating in the development of a taxonomy that categorizes these RDP definitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":28.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3729216\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3729216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benchmarking Relaxed Differential Privacy in Private Learning: A Comparative Survey
Differential privacy (DP), a rigorously quantifiable privacy preservation technique, has found widespread application within the domain of machine learning. As DP techniques are implemented in machine learning algorithms, a significant and intricate trade-off between privacy and utility emerges, garnering extensive attention from researchers. In the pursuit of striking a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding sensitive data and optimizing its utility, researchers have introduced various variants of Relaxed Differential Privacy (RDP) definitions. These nuanced formulations, however, exhibit substantial diversity in their underlying principles and interpretations of the core concept of DP, thereby engendering a current void in the comprehensive synthesis of these related works. The principal objective of this article is twofold. Firstly, it aims to provide a comprehensive summary of pertinent research endeavors pertaining to RDP within the realm of machine learning. Secondly, it endeavors to empirically assess the impact on both privacy and utility stemming from machine learning algorithms founded upon these RDP definitions. Additionally, this article undertakes a systematic analysis of the foundational principles underpinning distinct variants of relaxed definitions, culminating in the development of a taxonomy that categorizes these RDP definitions.
期刊介绍:
ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods.
ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.