清醒机器人深部脑刺激患者的导联移位误差与脑气。

Sibi Rajendran, Lokeshwar S Bhenderu, Jesus G Cruz-Garza, John D Patterson, Shourya Kumar, Paras Gupta, Taimur Hassan, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amir H Faraji
{"title":"清醒机器人深部脑刺激患者的导联移位误差与脑气。","authors":"Sibi Rajendran, Lokeshwar S Bhenderu, Jesus G Cruz-Garza, John D Patterson, Shourya Kumar, Paras Gupta, Taimur Hassan, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amir H Faraji","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The mechanisms of lead placement error and brain shift in deep brain stimulation (DBS) remain poorly understood. Further understanding is critical as lead displacement >2 mm can lead to poor treatment efficacy. Differences between anesthesia and surgical techniques often vary significantly, making the cause of error challenging to ascertain. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead shift error in patients undergoing awake, robotic-assisted surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six patients undergoing DBS with target ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) were included. All patients underwent bilateral lead placement under robotic guidance in an awake procedure, with left-sided leads placed first, followed by right-sided leads. Preoperative plan target points were compared with the final lead placement based on stereotactic computed tomography performed immediately postoperatively. The radial error between the postoperative computed tomography observation of the lead placement and the planned target was compared with the volume of pneumocephalus in the left vs right leads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had some degree of pneumocephalus, with an average amount of 18.9 ± 15.8 cm3 for both STN and VIM targets combined. The right-sided leads were placed medially to the planned target for both STN and VIM. There was a significant increase in the error magnitude for right-sided leads compared with left-sided leads for both STN and VIM targets (P < .01). Pneumocephalus was similar when comparing STN and VIM placement. No significant correlation existed between the total volume of pneumocephalus measured and lead misplacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes valuable insights into lead placement errors and pneumocephalus variability in bilateral DBS procedures in awake patients. Addressing these issues, correcting for possible systematic errors during preoperative planning, and further exploring the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead placement accuracy can optimize the therapeutic benefits of DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lead-Shift Error and Pneumocephalus in Awake, Robotic Deep Brain Stimulation Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sibi Rajendran, Lokeshwar S Bhenderu, Jesus G Cruz-Garza, John D Patterson, Shourya Kumar, Paras Gupta, Taimur Hassan, Khaled M Taghlabi, Amir H Faraji\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The mechanisms of lead placement error and brain shift in deep brain stimulation (DBS) remain poorly understood. Further understanding is critical as lead displacement >2 mm can lead to poor treatment efficacy. Differences between anesthesia and surgical techniques often vary significantly, making the cause of error challenging to ascertain. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead shift error in patients undergoing awake, robotic-assisted surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six patients undergoing DBS with target ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) were included. All patients underwent bilateral lead placement under robotic guidance in an awake procedure, with left-sided leads placed first, followed by right-sided leads. Preoperative plan target points were compared with the final lead placement based on stereotactic computed tomography performed immediately postoperatively. The radial error between the postoperative computed tomography observation of the lead placement and the planned target was compared with the volume of pneumocephalus in the left vs right leads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had some degree of pneumocephalus, with an average amount of 18.9 ± 15.8 cm3 for both STN and VIM targets combined. The right-sided leads were placed medially to the planned target for both STN and VIM. There was a significant increase in the error magnitude for right-sided leads compared with left-sided leads for both STN and VIM targets (P < .01). Pneumocephalus was similar when comparing STN and VIM placement. No significant correlation existed between the total volume of pneumocephalus measured and lead misplacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes valuable insights into lead placement errors and pneumocephalus variability in bilateral DBS procedures in awake patients. Addressing these issues, correcting for possible systematic errors during preoperative planning, and further exploring the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead placement accuracy can optimize the therapeutic benefits of DBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:深部脑刺激(DBS)中引线放置错误和脑移位的机制尚不清楚。进一步的了解是至关重要的,因为铅置换bbb20 mm可能导致较差的处理效果。麻醉和手术技术之间的差异往往很大,这使得错误的原因难以确定。本研究的目的是证明在接受清醒机器人辅助手术的患者中,脑气与导联移位误差之间的关系。方法:选取76例采用丘脑靶腹侧中间核(VIM)或丘脑下核(STN)进行DBS的患者。所有患者在清醒状态下均在机器人引导下进行双侧导联放置,先放置左侧导联,然后放置右侧导联。将术前计划靶点与术后立即进行立体定向计算机断层扫描的最终导线放置位置进行比较。将术后计算机断层扫描观察到的导联位置与计划目标之间的径向误差与左导联与右导联的气头体积进行比较。结果:所有患者均有不同程度的脑气,STN和VIM靶区合并平均18.9±15.8 cm3。右侧导联放置在STN和VIM计划目标的中间。与左侧导联相比,右侧导联在STN和VIM目标上的误差幅度显著增加(P < 0.01)。当比较STN和VIM放置时,脑气相似。测量的气头总容积与铅错置之间无显著相关性。结论:本研究对清醒患者双侧DBS手术中引线放置错误和气颅变异性提供了有价值的见解。解决这些问题,纠正术前计划中可能出现的系统性错误,并进一步探讨脑气与导联放置准确性之间的关系,可以优化DBS的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lead-Shift Error and Pneumocephalus in Awake, Robotic Deep Brain Stimulation Patients.

Background and objectives: The mechanisms of lead placement error and brain shift in deep brain stimulation (DBS) remain poorly understood. Further understanding is critical as lead displacement >2 mm can lead to poor treatment efficacy. Differences between anesthesia and surgical techniques often vary significantly, making the cause of error challenging to ascertain. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead shift error in patients undergoing awake, robotic-assisted surgery.

Methods: Seventy-six patients undergoing DBS with target ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) were included. All patients underwent bilateral lead placement under robotic guidance in an awake procedure, with left-sided leads placed first, followed by right-sided leads. Preoperative plan target points were compared with the final lead placement based on stereotactic computed tomography performed immediately postoperatively. The radial error between the postoperative computed tomography observation of the lead placement and the planned target was compared with the volume of pneumocephalus in the left vs right leads.

Results: All patients had some degree of pneumocephalus, with an average amount of 18.9 ± 15.8 cm3 for both STN and VIM targets combined. The right-sided leads were placed medially to the planned target for both STN and VIM. There was a significant increase in the error magnitude for right-sided leads compared with left-sided leads for both STN and VIM targets (P < .01). Pneumocephalus was similar when comparing STN and VIM placement. No significant correlation existed between the total volume of pneumocephalus measured and lead misplacement.

Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into lead placement errors and pneumocephalus variability in bilateral DBS procedures in awake patients. Addressing these issues, correcting for possible systematic errors during preoperative planning, and further exploring the relationship between pneumocephalus and lead placement accuracy can optimize the therapeutic benefits of DBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信