Harsh Jain, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Iyan Younus, Tyler Zeoli, Keyan Peterson, Zeeshan M Sardar, Scott L Zuckerman
{"title":"闭合三柱截骨术与构造间闭合:病例系列和术中图片和视频的技术说明。","authors":"Harsh Jain, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Iyan Younus, Tyler Zeoli, Keyan Peterson, Zeeshan M Sardar, Scott L Zuckerman","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>When performing a 3-column osteotomy (3CO) in adult spinal deformity surgery, osteotomy closure carries major risk. The construct-to-construct closure technique has been previously described as a safe means to close a 3CO. We sought to provide an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique through a case series using illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos for spine surgeons looking to incorporate this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-surgeon case series was undertaken of 3COs using the construct-to-construct closure technique. A detailed description of the technique with corresponding illustrations was provided. For each case, a summary with key intraoperative pictures and videos was included. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (mean age: 57.1 ± 10.2 years; 57% females) underwent a 3CO with mean follow-up of 12 months at the following levels: L4, T11, L3, T10, T10-12, T12, and L2. Construct-to-construct closure was used in all cases with a mean correction of 36.3° ± 5.8° (range 28°-47°). Neuromonitoring data were stable in 5 cases, but a significant decrease in data was seen during osteotomy closure in 2 cases. In the 2 cases where data were lost, the correction was quickly released in a controlled manner and the postoperative neurological examination was stable to improved. No cases of screw pullout, screw plowing, or subluxation occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current case series provides an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique to close a 3CO and is accompanied by illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closing a Three-Column Osteotomy with a Construct-To-Construct Closure: Case Series and Technical Note With Intraoperative Pictures and Videos.\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Jain, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Iyan Younus, Tyler Zeoli, Keyan Peterson, Zeeshan M Sardar, Scott L Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>When performing a 3-column osteotomy (3CO) in adult spinal deformity surgery, osteotomy closure carries major risk. The construct-to-construct closure technique has been previously described as a safe means to close a 3CO. We sought to provide an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique through a case series using illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos for spine surgeons looking to incorporate this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-surgeon case series was undertaken of 3COs using the construct-to-construct closure technique. A detailed description of the technique with corresponding illustrations was provided. For each case, a summary with key intraoperative pictures and videos was included. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (mean age: 57.1 ± 10.2 years; 57% females) underwent a 3CO with mean follow-up of 12 months at the following levels: L4, T11, L3, T10, T10-12, T12, and L2. Construct-to-construct closure was used in all cases with a mean correction of 36.3° ± 5.8° (range 28°-47°). Neuromonitoring data were stable in 5 cases, but a significant decrease in data was seen during osteotomy closure in 2 cases. In the 2 cases where data were lost, the correction was quickly released in a controlled manner and the postoperative neurological examination was stable to improved. No cases of screw pullout, screw plowing, or subluxation occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current case series provides an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique to close a 3CO and is accompanied by illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Closing a Three-Column Osteotomy with a Construct-To-Construct Closure: Case Series and Technical Note With Intraoperative Pictures and Videos.
Background and objectives: When performing a 3-column osteotomy (3CO) in adult spinal deformity surgery, osteotomy closure carries major risk. The construct-to-construct closure technique has been previously described as a safe means to close a 3CO. We sought to provide an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique through a case series using illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos for spine surgeons looking to incorporate this technique.
Methods: A retrospective, single-surgeon case series was undertaken of 3COs using the construct-to-construct closure technique. A detailed description of the technique with corresponding illustrations was provided. For each case, a summary with key intraoperative pictures and videos was included. Descriptive statistics were performed.
Results: Seven patients (mean age: 57.1 ± 10.2 years; 57% females) underwent a 3CO with mean follow-up of 12 months at the following levels: L4, T11, L3, T10, T10-12, T12, and L2. Construct-to-construct closure was used in all cases with a mean correction of 36.3° ± 5.8° (range 28°-47°). Neuromonitoring data were stable in 5 cases, but a significant decrease in data was seen during osteotomy closure in 2 cases. In the 2 cases where data were lost, the correction was quickly released in a controlled manner and the postoperative neurological examination was stable to improved. No cases of screw pullout, screw plowing, or subluxation occurred.
Conclusion: The current case series provides an in-depth description of the construct-to-construct closure technique to close a 3CO and is accompanied by illustrations and intraoperative pictures and videos.