打破沉默:筛查在医生发起的枪支安全对话中的作用。

Jennifer Necci Dineen, Damion Grasso, Amanda Hoey, Amanda Rae Kahn, Kerri M Raissian
{"title":"打破沉默:筛查在医生发起的枪支安全对话中的作用。","authors":"Jennifer Necci Dineen, Damion Grasso, Amanda Hoey, Amanda Rae Kahn, Kerri M Raissian","doi":"10.1177/10901981251338864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article expands and investigates what physicians perceive as facilitators and barriers to initiating preventive health education, also called anticipatory guidance or medical education, around secure firearm storage in the home (safe storage) and outside the home (Emergency Risk Protection Orders [ERPO]). We employ in-depth qualitative interviews with 36 New Jersey physicians randomly selected from two national physician panels. Participants were screened for inclusions based on their specialty (family medicine or internist, obstetrics/gynecology, or pediatrics), practice setting (office-based rather than hospital-based), and time spent (80% or more) on direct patient care. Based on interviews, we identify five physician-perceived barriers to providing secure firearm storage counseling: inadequate screening mechanisms to prompt conversations, physician perceptions of who is at risk for firearm injury, time pressures, concerns about patient receptivity, and a need for physician training. Our findings indicate that there are structural barriers to physician-initiated firearm safety guidance. Interventions designed to increase physicians' willingness to have these conversations must first address why these conversations fail to occur. Physician participants expressed the need for revised patient screening tools, training on approaching conversations about secure firearm storage, and a mechanism to allocate sufficient time in a well-visit, among the many other topics they must discuss. Interview participants had minimal understanding of ERPO and how to counsel patients on petitioning for ERPO.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"10901981251338864"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the Silence: The Role of Screening in Physician-Initiated Firearm Safety Conversations.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Necci Dineen, Damion Grasso, Amanda Hoey, Amanda Rae Kahn, Kerri M Raissian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10901981251338864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article expands and investigates what physicians perceive as facilitators and barriers to initiating preventive health education, also called anticipatory guidance or medical education, around secure firearm storage in the home (safe storage) and outside the home (Emergency Risk Protection Orders [ERPO]). We employ in-depth qualitative interviews with 36 New Jersey physicians randomly selected from two national physician panels. Participants were screened for inclusions based on their specialty (family medicine or internist, obstetrics/gynecology, or pediatrics), practice setting (office-based rather than hospital-based), and time spent (80% or more) on direct patient care. Based on interviews, we identify five physician-perceived barriers to providing secure firearm storage counseling: inadequate screening mechanisms to prompt conversations, physician perceptions of who is at risk for firearm injury, time pressures, concerns about patient receptivity, and a need for physician training. Our findings indicate that there are structural barriers to physician-initiated firearm safety guidance. Interventions designed to increase physicians' willingness to have these conversations must first address why these conversations fail to occur. Physician participants expressed the need for revised patient screening tools, training on approaching conversations about secure firearm storage, and a mechanism to allocate sufficient time in a well-visit, among the many other topics they must discuss. Interview participants had minimal understanding of ERPO and how to counsel patients on petitioning for ERPO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10901981251338864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251338864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251338864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章扩展并调查了医生所认为的启动预防性健康教育的促进者和障碍,也称为预期指导或医学教育,围绕在家(安全储存)和在家外(紧急风险保护令[ERPO])的安全枪支储存。我们对36名新泽西州的医生进行了深入的定性访谈,这些医生是从两个全国医生小组中随机选择的。根据他们的专业(家庭医学或内科、产科/妇科或儿科)、实践环境(以办公室为基础而不是以医院为基础)和在直接病人护理上花费的时间(80%或更多)筛选纳入的参与者。基于访谈,我们确定了医生认为提供安全枪支储存咨询的五个障碍:提示对话的筛查机制不足,医生对谁有枪支伤害风险的认识,时间压力,对患者接受程度的担忧,以及对医生培训的需要。我们的研究结果表明,医生发起的枪支安全指导存在结构性障碍。旨在提高医生进行这些对话意愿的干预措施必须首先解决这些对话未能发生的原因。医生参与者表示,在他们必须讨论的许多其他主题中,有必要修订患者筛查工具,培训关于安全枪支储存的谈话,以及在井访中分配足够时间的机制。访谈参与者对ERPO的了解很少,也不知道如何建议患者申请ERPO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the Silence: The Role of Screening in Physician-Initiated Firearm Safety Conversations.

This article expands and investigates what physicians perceive as facilitators and barriers to initiating preventive health education, also called anticipatory guidance or medical education, around secure firearm storage in the home (safe storage) and outside the home (Emergency Risk Protection Orders [ERPO]). We employ in-depth qualitative interviews with 36 New Jersey physicians randomly selected from two national physician panels. Participants were screened for inclusions based on their specialty (family medicine or internist, obstetrics/gynecology, or pediatrics), practice setting (office-based rather than hospital-based), and time spent (80% or more) on direct patient care. Based on interviews, we identify five physician-perceived barriers to providing secure firearm storage counseling: inadequate screening mechanisms to prompt conversations, physician perceptions of who is at risk for firearm injury, time pressures, concerns about patient receptivity, and a need for physician training. Our findings indicate that there are structural barriers to physician-initiated firearm safety guidance. Interventions designed to increase physicians' willingness to have these conversations must first address why these conversations fail to occur. Physician participants expressed the need for revised patient screening tools, training on approaching conversations about secure firearm storage, and a mechanism to allocate sufficient time in a well-visit, among the many other topics they must discuss. Interview participants had minimal understanding of ERPO and how to counsel patients on petitioning for ERPO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信