Honor Vincent MA, BSc, Alice Hodder MA (Hons), BSc, Shawn Walker PhD
{"title":"分娩中的生物动力干预:科学综述。","authors":"Honor Vincent MA, BSc, Alice Hodder MA (Hons), BSc, Shawn Walker PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biodynamic interventions are targeted suggestions for postural changes thought to quicken the progress or ease the discomfort of labor and birth, especially when fetuses are not in the optimal position. Although biodynamic interventions carry almost no risks and come from a rich anecdotal body of evidence, they have generally not been subject to rigorous evaluation. Current clinical practice guidelines support the use of intravenous oxytocin and manual or instrumental rotation for delayed labor progress and fetal malposition; however, these interventions are associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal morbidities. The use of biodynamic interventions may be an effective alternative to optimizing fetal position and labor progress, with fewer associated risks. This state of the science review examines research describing the efficacy of various biodynamic interventions on labor progress, fetal malposition, and mode of birth within specific clinical contexts. The review also seeks to draw out key findings for clinical practice and identify gaps in the literature for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":"422-430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13772","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodynamic Interventions in Labor: A State of the Science Review\",\"authors\":\"Honor Vincent MA, BSc, Alice Hodder MA (Hons), BSc, Shawn Walker PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biodynamic interventions are targeted suggestions for postural changes thought to quicken the progress or ease the discomfort of labor and birth, especially when fetuses are not in the optimal position. Although biodynamic interventions carry almost no risks and come from a rich anecdotal body of evidence, they have generally not been subject to rigorous evaluation. Current clinical practice guidelines support the use of intravenous oxytocin and manual or instrumental rotation for delayed labor progress and fetal malposition; however, these interventions are associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal morbidities. The use of biodynamic interventions may be an effective alternative to optimizing fetal position and labor progress, with fewer associated risks. This state of the science review examines research describing the efficacy of various biodynamic interventions on labor progress, fetal malposition, and mode of birth within specific clinical contexts. The review also seeks to draw out key findings for clinical practice and identify gaps in the literature for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"422-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13772\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13772\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biodynamic Interventions in Labor: A State of the Science Review
Biodynamic interventions are targeted suggestions for postural changes thought to quicken the progress or ease the discomfort of labor and birth, especially when fetuses are not in the optimal position. Although biodynamic interventions carry almost no risks and come from a rich anecdotal body of evidence, they have generally not been subject to rigorous evaluation. Current clinical practice guidelines support the use of intravenous oxytocin and manual or instrumental rotation for delayed labor progress and fetal malposition; however, these interventions are associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal morbidities. The use of biodynamic interventions may be an effective alternative to optimizing fetal position and labor progress, with fewer associated risks. This state of the science review examines research describing the efficacy of various biodynamic interventions on labor progress, fetal malposition, and mode of birth within specific clinical contexts. The review also seeks to draw out key findings for clinical practice and identify gaps in the literature for future research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed