教育干预对改善阿片类药物使用障碍患者急诊住院治疗的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Corey S Hazekamp, Bernard P Chang, Anthony D Scoccimarro, Jason R West, Dana L Sacco
{"title":"教育干预对改善阿片类药物使用障碍患者急诊住院治疗的影响","authors":"Corey S Hazekamp, Bernard P Chang, Anthony D Scoccimarro, Jason R West, Dana L Sacco","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Introducing evidence-based treatment strategies into education for emergency medicine (EM) residents might improve treatment for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an educational initiative in treating OUD with emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of an educational initiative using case-based discussions to train EM residents in the treatment of OUD, including ED-initiated buprenorphine, at a single EM residency program. Patients at the corresponding ED who were given an OUD-related diagnosis were screened for the initiation of buprenorphine. We calculated the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine among eligible patients 6 months before and 6 months after the educational initiative. Patients currently treated with buprenorphine or methadone were excluded from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the educational initiative, 14% (26/186) of patients with OUD eligible for buprenorphine underwent a novel buprenorphine induction in the ED, which increased to 18% (33/183) after the educational initiative. Following the educational initiative, the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine compared with the pre-educational initiative was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.77-2.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total number of people with OUD treated with buprenorphine increased after our educational initiative, but the odds ratio was not statistically significant. Complementing educational initiatives, other factors are likely needed to significantly increase the likelihood that a person with OUD is treated with buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 3","pages":"100157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of an Educational Intervention to Improve Emergency Medicine Resident Treatment of Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Corey S Hazekamp, Bernard P Chang, Anthony D Scoccimarro, Jason R West, Dana L Sacco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Introducing evidence-based treatment strategies into education for emergency medicine (EM) residents might improve treatment for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an educational initiative in treating OUD with emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of an educational initiative using case-based discussions to train EM residents in the treatment of OUD, including ED-initiated buprenorphine, at a single EM residency program. Patients at the corresponding ED who were given an OUD-related diagnosis were screened for the initiation of buprenorphine. We calculated the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine among eligible patients 6 months before and 6 months after the educational initiative. Patients currently treated with buprenorphine or methadone were excluded from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the educational initiative, 14% (26/186) of patients with OUD eligible for buprenorphine underwent a novel buprenorphine induction in the ED, which increased to 18% (33/183) after the educational initiative. Following the educational initiative, the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine compared with the pre-educational initiative was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.77-2.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total number of people with OUD treated with buprenorphine increased after our educational initiative, but the odds ratio was not statistically significant. Complementing educational initiatives, other factors are likely needed to significantly increase the likelihood that a person with OUD is treated with buprenorphine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将循证治疗策略引入急诊医学(EM)居民的教育中,可能会改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的治疗。我们的目的是评估教育活动对急诊科(ED)发起的丁丙诺啡治疗OUD的影响。方法:这是一个回顾性分析的教育倡议,使用基于案例的讨论来培训急诊住院医师治疗OUD,包括ed启动丁丙诺啡,在一个单一的急诊住院医师项目。在相应的急诊科诊断为oud相关的患者进行丁丙诺啡启动筛查。我们计算了在教育开始前6个月和6个月后接受ed启动丁丙诺啡的合格患者的几率。目前正在接受丁丙诺啡或美沙酮治疗的患者被排除在分析之外。结果:在教育启动前,14%(26/186)符合丁丙诺啡在ED诱导的OUD患者接受了新的丁丙诺啡诱导,教育启动后增加到18%(33/183)。在教育开始后,与教育开始前相比,接受ed启动丁丙诺啡的几率为1.35 (95% CI, 0.77-2.24)。结论:丁丙诺啡治疗OUD患者的总人数在我们的教育活动后有所增加,但优势比无统计学意义。除了教育举措外,可能还需要其他因素来显著增加OUD患者接受丁丙诺啡治疗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of an Educational Intervention to Improve Emergency Medicine Resident Treatment of Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.

Objectives: Introducing evidence-based treatment strategies into education for emergency medicine (EM) residents might improve treatment for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an educational initiative in treating OUD with emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of an educational initiative using case-based discussions to train EM residents in the treatment of OUD, including ED-initiated buprenorphine, at a single EM residency program. Patients at the corresponding ED who were given an OUD-related diagnosis were screened for the initiation of buprenorphine. We calculated the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine among eligible patients 6 months before and 6 months after the educational initiative. Patients currently treated with buprenorphine or methadone were excluded from the analysis.

Results: Before the educational initiative, 14% (26/186) of patients with OUD eligible for buprenorphine underwent a novel buprenorphine induction in the ED, which increased to 18% (33/183) after the educational initiative. Following the educational initiative, the odds of receiving ED-initiated buprenorphine compared with the pre-educational initiative was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.77-2.24).

Conclusion: The total number of people with OUD treated with buprenorphine increased after our educational initiative, but the odds ratio was not statistically significant. Complementing educational initiatives, other factors are likely needed to significantly increase the likelihood that a person with OUD is treated with buprenorphine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信