世界范围内经宫颈微创治疗食管癌的调查:经宫颈微创食管切除术国际协作组问卷调查结果

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Federica Riccio, Bastiaan R Klarenbeek, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Yasuyuki Seto, Miguel A Cuesta
{"title":"世界范围内经宫颈微创治疗食管癌的调查:经宫颈微创食管切除术国际协作组问卷调查结果","authors":"Federica Riccio, Bastiaan R Klarenbeek, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Yasuyuki Seto, Miguel A Cuesta","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged over open surgery, showing important advantages on the short time and comparable oncological outcomes, though concerns persist about pulmonary complications. The avoidance of the thoracic route has shown lower pulmonary complication rates compared to traditional approaches. Since 2015, a novel technique was introduced combining single port transcervical and transhiatal laparoscopic mediastinal dissection for esophageal resection. The procedure is nowadays expanding, following the IDEAL framework stage 2b an international collaborative group has been created to register, standardize the procedure, selection of patients, and assess the outcome, highlighting the need for ongoing discussion and research. A broad questionnaire was sent to all the groups worldwide known to us performing this procedure. Results of this questionnaire are the goal of this manuscript, aiming to present the procedure, experiences, problems, and lessons learned with this procedure. The thirteen respondents currently practicing this technique were categorized based on case volume and experience. Results show varied surgical indications, with higher-volume centers displaying less selectivity. Slightly different surgical approaches were reported, with the left transcervical and abdominal transhiatal dissection being the basis techniques. Surgeons reported high rates of R0 resection and lymph node harvested, low rates of pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, but high rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries. The collaborative group aims to align techniques, share experiences, and standardize procedures. Despite concerns about recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, not different from other total mediastinal lymphadenectomy techniques, the procedure shows promise in reducing pulmonary complications, marking a crucial step toward global acceptance. Future efforts will focus on standardization, comparative studies, and training protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide survey on the transcervical approach for minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: results of questionnaire of the international collaborative group on transCervical Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Riccio, Bastiaan R Klarenbeek, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Yasuyuki Seto, Miguel A Cuesta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doaf035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged over open surgery, showing important advantages on the short time and comparable oncological outcomes, though concerns persist about pulmonary complications. The avoidance of the thoracic route has shown lower pulmonary complication rates compared to traditional approaches. Since 2015, a novel technique was introduced combining single port transcervical and transhiatal laparoscopic mediastinal dissection for esophageal resection. The procedure is nowadays expanding, following the IDEAL framework stage 2b an international collaborative group has been created to register, standardize the procedure, selection of patients, and assess the outcome, highlighting the need for ongoing discussion and research. A broad questionnaire was sent to all the groups worldwide known to us performing this procedure. Results of this questionnaire are the goal of this manuscript, aiming to present the procedure, experiences, problems, and lessons learned with this procedure. The thirteen respondents currently practicing this technique were categorized based on case volume and experience. Results show varied surgical indications, with higher-volume centers displaying less selectivity. Slightly different surgical approaches were reported, with the left transcervical and abdominal transhiatal dissection being the basis techniques. Surgeons reported high rates of R0 resection and lymph node harvested, low rates of pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, but high rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries. The collaborative group aims to align techniques, share experiences, and standardize procedures. Despite concerns about recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, not different from other total mediastinal lymphadenectomy techniques, the procedure shows promise in reducing pulmonary complications, marking a crucial step toward global acceptance. Future efforts will focus on standardization, comparative studies, and training protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085945/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创食管切除术已经出现在开放手术中,在短时间和可比较的肿瘤结果方面显示出重要的优势,尽管对肺部并发症的担忧仍然存在。与传统入路相比,避免胸部入路显示出更低的肺部并发症发生率。自2015年以来,我们引入了一种新的技术,将单孔经颈和经裂孔腹腔镜纵隔夹层分离用于食管切除术。目前,该程序正在扩展,根据IDEAL框架2b阶段,已经创建了一个国际合作小组来注册,规范程序,选择患者并评估结果,强调需要进行持续的讨论和研究。一份广泛的调查问卷发给了我们所知道的世界上所有执行这一程序的小组。调查问卷的结果是本文的目的,旨在介绍该程序的程序、经验、问题和经验教训。目前采用这种技术的13个答复者根据病例量和经验进行了分类。结果显示不同的手术指征,高容量中心显示较少的选择性。略有不同的手术入路被报道,以左经颈和腹经裂孔解剖为基础技术。外科医生报告R0切除和淋巴结切除的发生率高,肺并发症和吻合口漏的发生率低,但喉返神经损伤的发生率高。协作小组的目标是协调技术、分享经验和标准化程序。尽管担心喉返神经损伤,但与其他全纵隔淋巴结切除术技术没有什么不同,该手术显示出减少肺部并发症的希望,标志着全球接受的关键一步。未来的努力将集中在标准化、比较研究和培训协议上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worldwide survey on the transcervical approach for minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: results of questionnaire of the international collaborative group on transCervical Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged over open surgery, showing important advantages on the short time and comparable oncological outcomes, though concerns persist about pulmonary complications. The avoidance of the thoracic route has shown lower pulmonary complication rates compared to traditional approaches. Since 2015, a novel technique was introduced combining single port transcervical and transhiatal laparoscopic mediastinal dissection for esophageal resection. The procedure is nowadays expanding, following the IDEAL framework stage 2b an international collaborative group has been created to register, standardize the procedure, selection of patients, and assess the outcome, highlighting the need for ongoing discussion and research. A broad questionnaire was sent to all the groups worldwide known to us performing this procedure. Results of this questionnaire are the goal of this manuscript, aiming to present the procedure, experiences, problems, and lessons learned with this procedure. The thirteen respondents currently practicing this technique were categorized based on case volume and experience. Results show varied surgical indications, with higher-volume centers displaying less selectivity. Slightly different surgical approaches were reported, with the left transcervical and abdominal transhiatal dissection being the basis techniques. Surgeons reported high rates of R0 resection and lymph node harvested, low rates of pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, but high rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries. The collaborative group aims to align techniques, share experiences, and standardize procedures. Despite concerns about recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, not different from other total mediastinal lymphadenectomy techniques, the procedure shows promise in reducing pulmonary complications, marking a crucial step toward global acceptance. Future efforts will focus on standardization, comparative studies, and training protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信