评估基于人工智能模型的药物开发(MIDD)的影响:一项比较综述。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bingyu Mao, Yue Gao, Christine Xu, Sreeraj Macha, Shuai Shao, Malidi Ahamadi
{"title":"评估基于人工智能模型的药物开发(MIDD)的影响:一项比较综述。","authors":"Bingyu Mao, Yue Gao, Christine Xu, Sreeraj Macha, Shuai Shao, Malidi Ahamadi","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods play critical role to ensure development of efficacious, and safe individualized therapies. The application of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) within the field of drug development has exponentially expanded. Integrating AI/ML into traditional pharmacometrics approaches or using AI/ML as a stand-alone tool has the potential to optimize dosing strategies, inform clinical trial designs, and enhance robustness of quantitative assessments of drug efficacy and safety. This review systematically evaluates the impact of AI-based model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods compared to traditional approaches by blending regulatory perspectives. We conducted a systematic search on PubMed using five Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and included 67 relevant studies in the analysis. The results indicate that AI models have the potential of improving MIDD approaches through different stages of drug development to inform decision-making in clinical trials. However, limitations such as the lack of standardized evaluation metrics and standardized regulatory guidelines on the use of AI-based MIDD methods were noted. Overall, this review highlights the potential applications of AI in drug development and provides a foundation for future research to optimize and integrate AI-based approaches in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 4","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Impact of AI-Based Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD): A Comparative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bingyu Mao, Yue Gao, Christine Xu, Sreeraj Macha, Shuai Shao, Malidi Ahamadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-025-01075-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods play critical role to ensure development of efficacious, and safe individualized therapies. The application of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) within the field of drug development has exponentially expanded. Integrating AI/ML into traditional pharmacometrics approaches or using AI/ML as a stand-alone tool has the potential to optimize dosing strategies, inform clinical trial designs, and enhance robustness of quantitative assessments of drug efficacy and safety. This review systematically evaluates the impact of AI-based model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods compared to traditional approaches by blending regulatory perspectives. We conducted a systematic search on PubMed using five Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and included 67 relevant studies in the analysis. The results indicate that AI models have the potential of improving MIDD approaches through different stages of drug development to inform decision-making in clinical trials. However, limitations such as the lack of standardized evaluation metrics and standardized regulatory guidelines on the use of AI-based MIDD methods were noted. Overall, this review highlights the potential applications of AI in drug development and provides a foundation for future research to optimize and integrate AI-based approaches in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01075-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01075-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)方法在确保开发有效、安全的个体化治疗方面发挥着至关重要的作用。人工智能/机器学习(AI/ML)在药物开发领域的应用呈指数级扩展。将AI/ML整合到传统的药物计量学方法中,或将AI/ML作为一个独立的工具使用,有可能优化给药策略,为临床试验设计提供信息,并增强药物疗效和安全性定量评估的稳健性。本综述通过混合监管观点,系统地评估了基于人工智能的模型知情药物开发(MIDD)方法与传统方法相比的影响。我们使用5个医学主题词(MeSH)对PubMed进行了系统搜索,并在分析中纳入了67项相关研究。结果表明,人工智能模型有潜力通过药物开发的不同阶段改进MIDD方法,为临床试验中的决策提供信息。然而,也注意到诸如缺乏标准化评价指标和使用基于人工智能的MIDD方法的标准化监管指南等限制。综上所述,本文重点介绍了人工智能在药物开发中的潜在应用,并为未来优化和整合该领域基于人工智能的方法提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Impact of AI-Based Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD): A Comparative Review.

Model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods play critical role to ensure development of efficacious, and safe individualized therapies. The application of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) within the field of drug development has exponentially expanded. Integrating AI/ML into traditional pharmacometrics approaches or using AI/ML as a stand-alone tool has the potential to optimize dosing strategies, inform clinical trial designs, and enhance robustness of quantitative assessments of drug efficacy and safety. This review systematically evaluates the impact of AI-based model-informed drug development (MIDD) methods compared to traditional approaches by blending regulatory perspectives. We conducted a systematic search on PubMed using five Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and included 67 relevant studies in the analysis. The results indicate that AI models have the potential of improving MIDD approaches through different stages of drug development to inform decision-making in clinical trials. However, limitations such as the lack of standardized evaluation metrics and standardized regulatory guidelines on the use of AI-based MIDD methods were noted. Overall, this review highlights the potential applications of AI in drug development and provides a foundation for future research to optimize and integrate AI-based approaches in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信