“休息使我精力充沛”;在成人长期条件和疲劳康复休息的经验和观念:一项定性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Martin Ackah, Vincent Deary, Ulric S Abonie, Florentina Johanna Hettinga, Katie L Hackett
{"title":"“休息使我精力充沛”;在成人长期条件和疲劳康复休息的经验和观念:一项定性研究。","authors":"Martin Ackah, Vincent Deary, Ulric S Abonie, Florentina Johanna Hettinga, Katie L Hackett","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2512587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and understand the experiences and perceptions of rest among adults experiencing fatigue alongside a long-term condition (LTC) and healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 adults with LTCs experiencing fatigue and four HCPs. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis with inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) operationalisation of rest, (2) rest as a practiced skill, (3) rest as a tool for optimising functioning, and (4) barriers. Both participants with lived experience and HCPs viewed rest as reducing activities, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Both groups valued rest for managing energy, symptoms, and activities. Barriers included impact of expectations on persons with LTC, environmental, and interpersonal factors, as well as responsibilities and lack of resting skills. Lived-experience participants noted physical symptoms, while HCPs highlighted \"all-or-nothing\" thinking as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rest in chronic fatigue management involved reducing activity, restorative practices, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Identifying truly restorative activities was challenging. Both adults with LTC and HCPs recognised effective rest as a strategic tool for energy management, symptom control, and activity participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>\\\"Rest recharges my energy\\\"</i>; experiences and perceptions of rest in adults with long-term conditions and fatigue in rehabilitation: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Ackah, Vincent Deary, Ulric S Abonie, Florentina Johanna Hettinga, Katie L Hackett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2512587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and understand the experiences and perceptions of rest among adults experiencing fatigue alongside a long-term condition (LTC) and healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 adults with LTCs experiencing fatigue and four HCPs. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis with inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) operationalisation of rest, (2) rest as a practiced skill, (3) rest as a tool for optimising functioning, and (4) barriers. Both participants with lived experience and HCPs viewed rest as reducing activities, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Both groups valued rest for managing energy, symptoms, and activities. Barriers included impact of expectations on persons with LTC, environmental, and interpersonal factors, as well as responsibilities and lack of resting skills. Lived-experience participants noted physical symptoms, while HCPs highlighted \\\"all-or-nothing\\\" thinking as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rest in chronic fatigue management involved reducing activity, restorative practices, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Identifying truly restorative activities was challenging. Both adults with LTC and HCPs recognised effective rest as a strategic tool for energy management, symptom control, and activity participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2512587\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2512587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探索和理解长期疲劳(LTC)和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的成年人的休息体验和感知。方法:采用方便抽样和滚雪球抽样进行定性研究。对23名成年LTCs患者和4名hcp患者进行了半结构化访谈。数据录音,转录,并使用主题分析归纳方法进行分析。结果:确定了四个主题:(1)休息的操作化,(2)休息作为一种练习技能,(3)休息作为优化功能的工具,以及(4)障碍。有生活经验的参与者和hcp都认为休息可以减少活动,与自然联系,并摆脱责任。两组人都重视休息来管理精力、症状和活动。障碍包括对LTC患者的期望、环境和人际因素、责任和缺乏休息技能的影响。有实际经验的参与者注意到身体症状,而HCPs强调“全有或全无”的思维是一个重大障碍。结论:在慢性疲劳管理中,休息包括减少活动、恢复性练习、与自然联系以及脱离责任。确定真正的恢复活动是具有挑战性的。LTC和HCPs的成年人都认识到有效的休息是能量管理、症状控制和活动参与的战略工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Rest recharges my energy"; experiences and perceptions of rest in adults with long-term conditions and fatigue in rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

Purpose: To explore and understand the experiences and perceptions of rest among adults experiencing fatigue alongside a long-term condition (LTC) and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Methods: This qualitative study used convenience and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 adults with LTCs experiencing fatigue and four HCPs. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis with inductive approach.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) operationalisation of rest, (2) rest as a practiced skill, (3) rest as a tool for optimising functioning, and (4) barriers. Both participants with lived experience and HCPs viewed rest as reducing activities, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Both groups valued rest for managing energy, symptoms, and activities. Barriers included impact of expectations on persons with LTC, environmental, and interpersonal factors, as well as responsibilities and lack of resting skills. Lived-experience participants noted physical symptoms, while HCPs highlighted "all-or-nothing" thinking as a significant barrier.

Conclusion: Rest in chronic fatigue management involved reducing activity, restorative practices, connecting with nature, and disengaging from responsibilities. Identifying truly restorative activities was challenging. Both adults with LTC and HCPs recognised effective rest as a strategic tool for energy management, symptom control, and activity participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信